Re: Strong Debate! Excalibur vs. CZ-20 What's your fave and why?
March 05, 2000 at 04:13:44
In Reply to: Strong Debate! Excalibur vs. CZ-20 What's your fave and why?
posted by George(MICH) on March 04, 2000 at 17:31:57
Hi
#1 is yes and no. The Excal has 17 Feq, the Explorer has 28.The Excal works on conductivity alone, the Explorer also uses ferrous content.
#2 I have never used a CZ20. Have found silver rings where the Excal was in steady null because of nails so thick that each scoop had at least one in the bucket.
#3 not sure what you mean here, Depth? ability to handle mineralization?
#4 What do you mean everybodys has broken down.Mine hasn't failed. All machine if not used properly or maintained will break.This is a undeserved deserved smear.
#5 I have never had my Excal mask gold. How would anyone really know. If your getting a masking signal you don't dig. Neither machine will see a gold ring ontop of a steel plate.
Both are good machines.( I hunt with a fellow that has one. ) The Excal gives you more target ID info but you dig everything that repeats in the water anyway.
It's a tough call.
 Follow Ups:
This forum has been discontinued - please use our new forum
|
