Rob, I can only say that without the partial work of others I could not have solved the LUE. NERS described on //TREASUREHUNT.MININGCO.COM on the previous articles written in 1998 under Sir Francis Drake, located the land mass in rejection of this treasure. I had no idea what the land mass represented. I too, required some back ground history before I work on any enigma. When I tossed out all of the other possible Treasures in this area, I was holding up this weird drawing Von Mueller printed in his Treasure Hunters Manuel #7 on page 110. Six weeks later I was able to crack the two code placements from the LUE because I knew from the work of others where the LUE's starting point was. You are correct, all topics begin and end somewhere. This gentleman that wrote on the LUE, knew where the map began through a technique that was far different than my expertise, yet he failed to see the evidence, still encripted, that he had discovered. I used this with NERS to find the end of the LUE code by the gold cached there on this land in rejection. Rob, I know some of this makes no sense at all. Later I was able to prove the NERS point by the cracked placements. So Rob, in a since, I have cheated the brilliance behind the author of this code, to have solve it where no other have seem to have been able to do so. But I still had another surprise, this is where the LUE just begins, and I made many mistakes here sucking my thumb trying to understand the rest of the LUE nightmare. As I say this man put his own family at risk, because he knew NO ONE could solve the enigma. Well, I was standing there thanks to the permission give of his family to search. I had the land mass of the cache and the home of the conspirator, but he was dead and I didn't have a clue what to do next. Finally, I invented equipment that would killed this NERS field effects and I began working the energy back to the source. I had no other choice, because at that time I couldn't solve the LUE applied to the land, even though the Sun symbol was constructed on the Land itself. This is the only physical evidance that told me what I was on the correct land, except mumerious other natural symbols that were used to do the layout on the land. Rob, to me this wasn't a Treasure Hunt, but some life's time investment that has cost me $40,000, thus far, to solve the enigma to this point. I do know that the end will more than justify the means. The LUE has been my BEST work. I have already had three Geophysical scans in that area and missed it. Remember, the LUE will always give you information. The contestant must be wise enough to distinguages between which fact is true. NERS was helpless to provide data this close to the cache. This was an awkward situation. Not easy to do. The designers were mad at the United States for the Gold act that foiled their efforts. A good thing too, because we would have paid for Hitlers world war two, and not had the financial strength to defend our selves. WE WERE JUST LICKY! For a long time, I thought this was the real 16 ton Mexican contraband case near Shiprock, because everything on the land suggested Mexican, except the original owner of this land was a German. Presto! That was the answer I needed. The owner was a loyal German and Hitler used his property to the German effort. Another thing that came to mind while working on this case, is that the gold is still here because this man died 30 days after the last of the bullion arrived. How do I know this? The date on his tombstone as to the period of time in the 1930's when this occurred. Another thing I learned, was that the Germans did try to recover this gold. How do I know this? Because there are many dig holes still visable around one key area of the LUE layout. Yes, rob, you do have the cipher, you just need to know how to recognize it. This is all I can tell you. Richard

• What you said, Richard Steve 14:18:32 4/10/99 (5)
  • Re: What you said, Richard Richard Walburn 18:45:20 4/10/99 (0)
  • Re: What you said, Richard Rob 18:05:34 4/10/99 (3)
    • Re: What you said, Richard Richard Walburn 19:07:20 4/10/99 (2)
      • Re: What you said, Richard Rob 20:07:53 4/10/99 (1)
        • Re: What you said, Richard Richard Walburn 21:34:28 4/10/99 (0)