Re: Two Found Treasures
January 19, 2000 at 13:01:03
In Reply to: Two Found Treasures (by Richard Walburn)
posted by Al Osborn on January 18, 2000 at 18:10:25
Hi Al, a long time ago I was talking to Lanny about some of the NERS technology when he was playing around at the Grants cache site. Pretty nice to have all of that Treasure right out side of your back door to play with finding what instruments will work for you or will not work for you. Every time I fire up the car it's 1,500 miles round trip or more for me to do my work. Just recently investment capitol was suppose to pay for some of these NERS recoveries like the 72 tons silver Drake site on //home.earthlink.net/~eltesoro/drake.htm but this has fallen through and these sites are on hold.
In answer to your question. I don't do research, others do research. If the written word is necessary as the Drake 72 ton cache case required, there are simply hundreds of books to choose from in regard to Drake. All I did was solve Drake's enigma with NERS. The Drake's own personal code is 13 pages long only. To me, Drake says it all, himself. I'm simply the guy that solved the Drake Navigational chart code that was in front of historians for 450 years. NERS presented the land cache and I presented the code that proved the NERS study. Still I haven't gotten permission or the funds to recover that 90 million plus Treasure. Logistics are a killer sometimes.
Reiterating this again: The code of Drake simply said where Drake's California anchorage was and where he buried 72 tons of the queens silver. That's it, I didn't get into what Drake eat for breakfast, because I honestly didn't think it was necessary.
#1: The first site that was taken without any payment was the $80,000 Billy Grounds stashed from the Skeleton Canyon heist. This was hidden probably in a small cave on the private land of Hughs six miles south of Lordsburg or Shakespear. When they were hung at Shakespear they were almost to Hughs's cache where they could have lived good for a while. Instead they got a rope and exited history leaving this enigma.
I had never been on the land the cache was located. NERS is long distance and maps and satellites are used in earth energy studies. The gentleman that I provided this information with, had done his research and his daddy before him by interviewing the original players. I felt that they should have the cache fix point since their investigation had already taken them into the same basic area anyway. I simply gave them too much information before any formal agreement could be made. My fault. In my excitement, I blurted out this information, not realizing that men will be men-- good or bad. I provided this information to the forum only to try to save the many Skeleton Canyon searchers their gas because the BIRD IS GONE. Yes, there is the large cache to be recovered yet, If it is still there. But this is in a different area.
#2: Now the second site I shared was the 1852 remaining gold from the mysterious Jacksonville Oregon prospectors murders over around several hundred pounds of gold. Their bodies were found, but no murderer and loot was found. Thus the enigma began. Like I said, the partner that I had and I worked this NERS site down to the rocks where the gold was cached. I took a plane back home and my partner went Bye, Bye. His job wwas the recovery.If Dowsing gives you the answers of what happen, fine. As I say NERS provides the cache, I have to provide the research, and luckily some dude did this for me, and the story was published in 1984. The story by Larry B. McCormick titled "New Clues to the Lost Pedro" was published by Treasure magazine in July 1984. 12 years before I went there for the loot. McCormick really solved the enigma of the Indian living on this gold all of his life before he died. This truth was submitted by a ken of this Indian. All I did was find the rocks with NERS. Since the NERS site and this story were in the same basic spot, I related them as one and the same site. I chose this site because it was open BLM forestry land with not a soul to bug me. The gold was found under the rocks, not one flat rock, as the story said.
I don't do recoveries, but I'm learning how to do them now, because of my failure of being able to deal with people.
The third site not mentioned was the 100 pound missing gold bar from Sherif Porter Rockwell's personal ranch house in the Utah cherry creek area. Apparently, old slightly dishonest Porter Rockwell did keep one of the 100 pounds of gold from that famous 400 pounds of gold stage robbery. Because he only turned in 300 pounds of the robbery. He said, "Gosh, I guess the other bars is still out there somewhere." Yeah, it sure was. It was. On his ranch.
When I was working this case and Ranger flushed me out. I had no choice but to leave. He was the law and I had no back up staff. The ranger knew as much as I knew about this site that was not publically known. He had done his research well. NERS provided me with the site and sheer gumshoe had provided the ranger with the site. He earned his living there as a Ranger for the styate of Utah and I had to pony up the money and drive 2,000 miles to be there. I was out flanked badly. The best man won, or perhaps I should say, the most courageous man won that 100 pound bar of gold.
I will continue posting more finds and losses if it interests people? Al, I hope this answers you question and helps your dowsing. NERS provide caches and I have 63 cache sites in the Pacific States half of the United States through the Texas boarder in cluding the Aztec Depository, all collecting dust until an organized effort can recover them. I don't do any research until research is needed to complete the file with the Topographical maps , land owner documents, etc, which NERS has pointed out. I research LAST not first. This is the reverse of what most people do. The research comes from others that have published these facts except in cases where a way bill or code is supplied, which also is the written work as in the Drake case and the LUE. The cache is what I am primarily interested in and where it came from, the rest is just part of the stew to me.
Al, I hope this answered your question and assisted in your dowsing.
Richard Walburn
 Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
This forum has been discontinued - please use our new forum
Comments:
|
