TreasureNet - The Original Treasure Hunting Website! White's Metal Detectors - See What's In The Ground Before You Dig! Western & Eastern Treasures Magazine! J.W. Fisher Metal Detectors! Kellyco Metal Detectors! Your Ad Here! Opal Auctions!
Previous Member Finds!Recommend A Post! Recent Treasures Found By TreasureNet Members! Control the images you see!
US 2.5 Gold Coin!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wahoo !!!!!! A dream comes true !!!! Hafted with asphaltum, indian point... preserved! 1877 Indian. WOW Anglo-Saxon sceat Rare Revolutionary War Officer's Button & Colonial Counterstamped Silver 2000 YEAR OLD CELTIC GOLD STATER! "She" was a "He", and it didn't say Liberty I JUST PAID FOR MY DETECTOR !!! Celtic bronze coin...


This forum has been discontinued.
Please use our new forum
Follow Ups - Post Followup - Current Messages - FAQ - Your Ad Here

Do you mean KGC?
May 30, 2000 at 05:39:57
In Reply to: KJC-Spanish Mines & New Mexico
posted by Desert Eagle on May 29, 2000 at 19:20:04

I guess you mean KGC (Knights of the Golden Circle) and not KJC? If you've followed this forum for any length of time, you've seen postings on this subject before - most recent threads begun 12/12/99 and 10/22/99. The main pushers of the KGC story will claim that almost ALL western legends concerning Spanish gold, hidden treasure and lost mines are false and instead are part of an elaborate conspiracy perpetrated by the KGC in order to draw attention away from their own treasure-caching activities. There's huge holes in this scenario that haven't been filled yet, so if you want to buy it, you'll have to buy it on faith alone until a more complete explanation is offered. Anyway, SE New Mexico is certainly within the range of alleged KGC activity, so if you want to believe Jesse James carved his initials down there, then go for it - hey, maybe he did.

Your idea that the main travel route from Mexico City to Santa Fe being in eastern NM needs a lot of explaining. Presumably you are referring to a route following the Pecos River? This was a well-used trail to be sure - all trails in the southwest that had access to water were well-used. However, your claim of the Rio Grande route being only a "theory" ignores a constant stream of evidence and documentation beginning in the late 16th century and continuing through the middle of the 19th century at least. Why do you feel that the Pecos was more heavily used than the Rio Grande?

Regards, Steve


upFollow Ups:


upPost a Followup

This forum has been discontinued - please use our new forum

Comments:



up
Posted By: sc0001.zianet.com - 206.206.120.10 - May 30, 2000 at 05:39:57






ADVERTISE HERE


TreasureNet

Return To Top