|
|
Re: KGC IN CALIFORNIA February 17, 2003 at 13:21:16 In Reply to: Re: KGC IN CALIFORNIA posted by THE HANGMAN on February 17, 2003 at 08:46:59 |
|
Just elbow knocking in complete ignorance, as I pear into the nothingness of imagination in regard to the KGC. What I see isn't that far off from what one would expect to happen. This is like the Indians booting the white man off of the very land the whites took away from them by the largest smoking gun. An endless dream of theirs. If this was never possible to do by the Indians, at least it is in the mind of every Indian that views the skimpy wasteland in front of his residence on the reservation the government gave them for their own good, health and education. The only difference between my view of the imagination and the explanation you presented on the KGC is, that the Indians were never paid for their land at the point of a gun, Mexico was paid something, I understand? I can see this pain and loss in abused people as I look deeply into their eyes. That's a lot of emotional baggage some people have to pack around and still stand up straight and be a productive human being. History is full of this anywhere. The strongest rules. Yes, I can see a need of a KGC or an organization like it to stand up for, or protect the rights of abused people. Today we have the United Nations which I thought would handle these issues world wide, but I see it can't, or will not do this job. And the power struggle still goes on until we are all dust I guess? With my scanning equipment, I have noticed several targets on the state lines of various states. I was oblivious to why this occurred, until one man wrote me about an area that he wanted my opinion on. He said that he had found a skeleton with a disk around it's neck. He said that he had solved most of the code that was encrypted on this brass disk. I just listened with amazement. He gave me the basic location which I kept in my records. I just shrugged my shoulders and sadly I told him that I hadn't scanned that area yet, but I had some interesting clues that something was there in more then one place. Three years later I was in this area. And in two days I had located two caches approximately that were there in this basic area, give or take twenty miles. I logged the positions for my records. I have so many of these sites that it is a full time job keeping the records on them. Now I realize that one of these two Treasures I located in his area is a KGC Treasure. How did I determine this was a KGC cache not knowing zip about the KGC organization at all? I determined this simply because more then one case I have been involved in are of skeletons with brass disks in the remains found by others that shared this information with me or that I read posted. Not being a historian with rules to follow I lined this information and evidence in line as being a KGC MO or way of doing business. I believe Spider Rocks has a brass disk that was found too. So as you said Hangman, the KGC has been in may places that is not intirely KGC in interest. So being of normal Yankee wit, Hangman, I have grouped several sites into KGC caches simply because I learned quite by accident from this man that the KGC liked state borders for their caches. He didn't say this, but he did give me proof that this was true by the caches position. Just why did the KGC likes state borders is another enigma of itself? Now, I am open to learn more about the KGC on an adventurous mission rather than a critical judgemental quest in purpose. I don't know what I can contribute if anything? The man that contacted me may be deceased, because I have tried every way to reach him through his old associates to no resolve. I wanted to give him the information he asked me for three years late. He had certainly earned it. And due to his silence, he probably could have used the recovery too. Another Story: So, I learned about issues in the strangest ways sometimes that are not historically written about. Like the 72 ton Sir Francis Drake cache at Nava Albion. The instrument data was backed up by the secret encrypted code written by Sir Francis Drake on his personal navagional chart in 1579 later made by the queens map makers into a lovely map called the Hondius Broadside map in 1594. Fortunately, we have kept these maps to marvel at today or may enigmas would never be solved of yesterday. Of course, Hangman, no one believed this evidence discovered in 1882, but as we read about California losing it's greatest Drake proof of the presence of Nova Albion (Drake's Plate of Brass to being determined a phoney), I think the only thing left is the written word of Sir Francis Drake. And his very accurate word is encrypted on his charts and viewed by thousands of people over the last almost 500 years without recognition, until I did a Ag study there instrumentally and the Ag mass was discovered. Two pieces of evidence was known at the time. One clue was written by Drake's minister on the voyage that Francis Fletcher thought Drake had unload 40 tons of silver at Nova Albion. The second suggestion or clue, came in 1952 when the California Historical Society somehow purchased one diary page secretly for someone of Drake's original diary that was thought to have been confiscated by the Queen on Drake's return. The diary page was dated August 25, 1579. In this document Drake had said that they cached an amount of silver on a sparcely covered hill half way between the sea and an inland body of water. This has been under lock and key. I never personally saw this document. But I was told about this document from the Late Matt Dillingham. So the California Historical Society has known for many years that REAL TrEASURE was involved in the Nova Albion discivery if they ever find Nova Albion. When I came along in 1882, Hangman, all of the doors were mysteriously slammed shut? A strange behavior from people that allegedly wanted answers to their quest? Using this as a possible Drake link, I was able to use this position with the Drake reversals found on the Hondius Broadside map to crack Drake's code design and purpose. After this is was a fantastic marvel to see first hand what a very brilliant man Drake was to hid this truth for well over 400 years. His other submissions that depicted the very same position gave minute explaination of the Queens cache made at Nova Albion in code. The code told the physical size of the cache. It told how deep the cache was. And it told what physical element the cache consisted of. The cache according to Drakes word, was silver as Fletcher and the diary page had stated before that was already know. But the where of this site was NOT KNOWN. Pray tell, what else did historians want! Then, of course, from this information, I knew there Drake's 36 day California anchorage was and where the ellusive Portus Nova Albion was, plus his very accurate code to the location of 72 tons of silver. I presume he left this here to lighten his ship and funding perhaps for there for the Queens colonies which never manefested. There is no doubt other possibilities to ponder too in this regard? It is a pity historians don't recognise nor believe in codes. Drake did this twice in California protecting the Queens funds. I am not a historian, so I am not barred by rules and procedures. I was approached by a historian one day, if you can believe this, working on his PHD. He asked me what I knew about the Aztec depository in Utah. Then he muttered that he didn't care about any treasures involved. I wrote back that I didn't think I could help him because there was 25 tons of Aztec artifacts hidden within the enigma he asked me about. History and treasure go hand in hand, whether one can recover the legacy or not. To say, or to believe that Treasure doesn't exist, is living with blinders on, as I see it? I live in the bay area and I have murdered four cars over the years investigating the western half of the United States as well as I could instrumentally. What a blast it's been Hangman! Gosh, I am rambling on again. Sorry! So much of the history of the purpose of Drake's sojourn has not been excepted in almost 500 years. I think this is terrible, don't you? But quien sabe? Thank you for your time and consideration. Richard |
|