A Couple of New Clovis Blades

[uniface]

Numbers 1 & 4 (from left). Both from Kentucky and a bit over 4" in length.

The left one's uncannily like one of the Barnes points from the Thedford II site with a broken base, only it's a uniface and much too thick.

Sorry for having the other stuff in with them -- was illustrating Trapeziodal (1 & 2) and prismatic (3-5) blade forms ; this is the only halfway decent picture of them I could come up with.

How the picture got cropped on the top I have no idea.

[Th3rty7]

Nice looking old artifacts there, thanks for sharing.

[romeo-1]

Nice! I like those old blades!

[Tnmountains]

Beautiful blades. Go ahead and say the age so we may marvel just a little more
Nice Thanks for sharing Uni
TnMtns

[naturegirl]

Oooh, thanx uniface, for illustrating trapezoid/prismatic as well.

ng

[chong2]

i have a few more uni knives 4 u uni, but im just waiting on a new camera

[uniface]

Finally got some sun today. Not ideal, but better at least.

[ink-a-alot]

Finally got some sun today. Not ideal, but better at least.

Very nice man..

[creek astronaut]

nice lookin relics uni

[uniface]

Not a lot of people would consider stuff like them very appealing.

But I do

[creek astronaut]

i do.i would dig findn that stuff all day long

[Tnmountains]

Heck yeah man. I would dig till the cows came home,lol. Oppps did that sound kinda southern?
My Bad!

[uniface]

Far as I'm concerned, your good, Bro' !

Thing is, if they were in situ, in undisturbed ground, I'd turn the site over to a trustworthy, decent guy (or gal) archaeologist. No-brainer there.

The dirt between the artifacts is every bit as important as the artifacts are. Sometimes, more so. There's a lot more information in it than people even suspect.