|
-
Feb 19, 2007, 09:52 PM
#1
More of beanman's rocks
Last time I posted a picture, I didn't get beat up to bad, so I'm getting brave again. Just some more weird stuff from the site, where the other junk came from. 
bm
-
Feb 20, 2007, 06:09 AM
#2
Re: More of beanman's rocks
NOOOO!!! Bean Man, you were doing so good, I thought you had finally turned the corner!! Sorry, that was just for old times sake I don't think you have anything in this "frame". It is interesting variety of materials...some of it looks like limestone and others look like high iron sandstone...not something you find together a lot. Keep looking and keep posting-
Happy Hunting- Cannonman
"A culture truly grows great when old men plant trees in who's shade they know they will never sit"
-
Feb 20, 2007, 06:18 AM
#3
Re: More of beanman's rocks
LMAO! See, I'm even learning Chinese.
bm
-
Feb 21, 2007, 06:52 PM
#4
Re: More of beanman's rocks
You're getting there Bean Man. Definitely keep looking and keep posting. You'll find a really good one soon!
Good luck!
-
Feb 21, 2007, 07:04 PM
#5
Re: More of beanman's rocks
-
Feb 22, 2007, 12:07 AM
#6
Re: More of beanman's rocks
The bottom two pieces look like volcanic material to me. They look like chunks of rimrock. Where did you find those two pieces, if you don't mind saying?
-
Feb 22, 2007, 06:29 AM
#7
Re: More of beanman's rocks
Hi TT, I don't know materials worth a darn, but I don't think they are volcanic. They came from central Iowa, from the site all the other junk I,ve posted came from.
bm
-
Feb 25, 2007, 07:45 AM
#8
Re: More of beanman's rocks
I wouldve kept the peanut looking one.
-
Feb 25, 2007, 02:36 PM
#9
Re: More of beanman's rocks
Before last year I would not have. The peanut is 8 inches long and I believe, natural. Because it was with the other strange rocks, we brought it home. What I believe so far, is that the site is a large village guarry. Whether they used the peanut, no way to tell. Of course I thought club, but a friend said maybe a moccasin form. Anyway, thanks pa, hope you tear them up this year!
bm
-
Mar 03, 2007, 05:09 PM
#10
Re: More of beanman's rocks
I don't mean to offend anyone with my posts. I will say it again, Beanman's rocks are more then likely geofacts! I'm not trying to demean artifact collecting or anything. That being said, here's some more odd granite from the possible guarry site.
bm

Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|