Bigcypresshunter
Gold Member
- Dec 15, 2004
- 27,000
- 3,338
- Detector(s) used
- 70's Whites TM Amphibian, HH Pulse, Ace 250
- Primary Interest:
- Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Attachments
Upvote
0
bigcypresshunter said:Its got to be better than my homemade collender on a stick lol.
It looks heavier than the stealth. Would this be a problem?
If the wood handle is a problem in rough surf, couldnt I just use an iron pipe?
nuggetshooter said:OK - now that you all have posted pictures (thanks), I think I can get at my question better. Do they make a scoop like those pictured by Erikk, but with a handle angled like Normann? And, between the two styles, which is the better choice. I am trying to decide between the two styles, but it seems to me, and especially based on your comment Sandman (regarding the curved handle) that the angled handle would be easier to dig with than the one set to 90 degrees. Any pros and cons on both styles would be appreciated. I have never used a scoop in water other than just a few inches deep, and I used my sand scoop that is really not designed for water. I got a signal, however and wanted to investigate - lucky think I did since it was a nice silver ring. But, I am at a loss when it comes to what style to choose for the water. I like the idea of the handle floating so you can find the scoop, but I have not seen any that are angled with the wooden one attached that are fixed at an angle. Thanks again everyone - great info here.
nuggetshooter said:OK - now that you all have posted pictures (thanks), I think I can get at my question better. Do they make a scoop like those pictured by Erikk, but with a handle angled like Normann? And, between the two styles, which is the better choice. I am trying to decide between the two styles, but it seems to me, and especially based on your comment Sandman (regarding the curved handle) that the angled handle would be easier to dig with than the one set to 90 degrees. Any pros and cons on both styles would be appreciated. I have never used a scoop in water other than just a few inches deep, and I used my sand scoop that is really not designed for water. I got a signal, however and wanted to investigate - lucky think I did since it was a nice silver ring. But, I am at a loss when it comes to what style to choose for the water. I like the idea of the handle floating so you can find the scoop, but I have not seen any that are angled with the wooden one attached that are fixed at an angle. Thanks again everyone - great info here.
I like the amount of holes but they are for the sand only and would hold to many shells of small rocks. If only they were bigger holes. Also the handle attachment is for square handles.bigcypresshunter said:Im having trouble deciding too. Im leaning toward this one but the holes are kinda small.
nuggetshooter said:Kaptainkosmic - I am not sure I understand the problem with the angled handle. If you pulled back on the angled handle, would the scoop not tip up and make the sand etc stay in the scoop - especially with a handle up 14-16 inches? Is it because of how tall you are?
What do you all think of this scoop? http://www.nuttallenterprises.com/servlet/Detail?no=1
Anybody use/used it? If so, any pros or cons? What do you think about the fiberglass handle vs wood?
Thanks again for all you posts and opinions. All helpful in getting me to make the final decision.
Have a great rest of the week.
Darryl
Is your scoop homemade? It doesnt look as if enough holes were drilled in it.Normann said:The scoop looks nice, but what about the balance ? The handle is mounted in the bottom of the scoop,and no gravity in bottom.
This make the scoop top heavy filled with sand and you need to use more power to keep it straight, i think that's the reason for the free gloves. And with the handle in a 90 degree angel is not easy to make that first dig good. My scoops handle is 45 degree and i can allways see the toe when digging. My scoop has the handle welded to the top of the scoop, makes it in balance when loaded and never tip over.
I made it in a local ss welding shop here in Thailand. I made the plans, i payed 40 usd for it. And yes it is enough holes and the bucket its quick empty.bigcypresshunter said:Is your scoop homemade? It doesnt look as if enough holes were drilled in it.Normann said:The scoop looks nice, but what about the balance ? The handle is mounted in the bottom of the scoop,and no gravity in bottom.
This make the scoop top heavy filled with sand and you need to use more power to keep it straight, i think that's the reason for the free gloves. And with the handle in a 90 degree angel is not easy to make that first dig good. My scoops handle is 45 degree and i can allways see the toe when digging. My scoop has the handle welded to the top of the scoop, makes it in balance when loaded and never tip over.
I bought one of the RTG scoops and I like it except for one thing... It is really hard to get it to stay in position when stepping on it to dig... I got it to work slightly better by hammering it a bit and changing it from perfectly round to slightly oval, but it still could use something like a foot pad on the back..diggummup said:I know I wouldn't pay $100.00 for it. Here, go to this guy- http://www.rtgstore.com/, he's local and Kevin was a good guy and i'm sure they could use the business. They sell all kinds of scoops.
bigcypresshunter said:Heres another good looking scoop but I dont know the price yet. http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,310353.0.html
Here it is. Not much cheaper than the Stealth. http://www.prostockdetectors.com/REVC.html
Thanks for the reply.Phil_R said:bigcypresshunter said:
I bought one... well made, works great for wet sand / waters edge hunting. Post hole digger handle ($10.00 @ local hardware) is a nice snug fit, (2) 1/4" x 2" stainless bolts and self locking nuts finish the job.