Yes it loves iron, all PI machines love iron. You buy a PI to get deeper than a VLF detector
and you should dig every beep, not all iron sounds are iron, not only with the SH, but
others as well. If the beach your hunting has to much trash to suit you, move to a
different one. Big mistake using disc. on a beach. Do your own depth testing on your
area beaches to see how deep it will pickup different objects. Every beach is different!
What's more important is the depth to the base under the sand, If your trying to find
the good stuff, you need to know if your machine can reach that level. If your trying to
find gold rings and such you need to hunt over a base no deeper than 2 1/2 feet deep.
As the 14 x 10 loop is as large as you can get for the SH, that's about the limit it will
detect a ring. And yes I have one and I also have a Minelab SD2200d with different
size coils from 5 x 7" to 18" and it can go beyond 2 1/2 ft. and find rings.
I disagree completely with the contention that hard wiring is the way to go with an underwater metal detector.
The engineers of the most expensive underwater detectors agree with me.
What hardwiring really does is lower production costs for the manufacturer.
In this regard a hardwired detector is just as likely to fail as a detector with a bulkhead fiting.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. As an engineer, I worked for years in the electronics manufacturing industry. A hardwired connection can be completely sealed, a jack cannot. Stress relief is important, but eventually a jack is going to leak by its very nature.
Also wrong about manufacturing costs. Hand soldering is THE most expensive operation in electronics manufacturing. The labor costs for the hard wiring are way more than the cost of a connector.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. As an engineer, I worked for years in the electronics manufacturing industry. A hardwired connection can be completely sealed, a jack cannot. Stress relief is important, but eventually a jack is going to leak by its very nature.
Also wrong about manufacturing costs. Hand soldering is THE most expensive operation in electronics manufacturing. The labor costs for the hard wiring are way more than the cost of a connector.
I have to agree that hard wire is the only way to go to insure a lasting seal compared to what's out there in the connector market. In a calm environment some of these connectors perform fairly well but once you introduce increased pressure, salt, sand, and turbulence these connectors become subject to failure, even the better ones. And this rate of failure is also increased depending on the number of times these connectors are released and then resealed. I have tried them all in recent years and eventually they will all fail unless added measures are taken, and even this isn't a guarantee against failure if these connectors aren't routinely maintained and/or replaced. So I think a great deal of a connector's reliability is dependent on the environment it is subject to the maintaining of that connector.
No mods to my Sand Shark, straight off the shelf. Like I said, the beaches I hunt are not trashy. I have at times gone for hours without a hit. But everytime I get that double signal, it is a nail. On a beach like you describe that is covered with nails, I would probably miss some good targets by skipping the double signals, since there might be goodies under the nails.
Again, this thread is about the Garrett PI machine, with which I have no experience. I am assuming it would behave similar to the Sand Shark.
Jolly, I would agree with you about Mel Fisher and crew using the MK 2 during their search. Difference being they were looking for metal of any kind in a deep water (over 10 ft) enviroment.
I've wondered why I ended up with the "lemon" of the line. 4 times at that. I don't mistreat my equipment, I don't drop it, don't leave it in the heat or cold, clean it after each use in fresh water and I still end up with problems like falsing, or constant signalling while searching. There has to be a reason I see no other Sea Hunter machines on the beaches of Pinellas County. Trust me, I'd much rather keep the shipping fees and repair money in my own pocket than sharing it with Garrett.
The only real negative I have heard from the salvage guys is that they have had to replace the headphones/jack on several machines. I'm "assuming" this was due to leakage.
Well you had better alert the engineers at Aqua Scan Intl. and J. W. Fishers...the makers of the most expensive underwater PI's on the market...both of whom use bulkhead fittings.
I never said a bulkhead fitting could be permanetly sealed, of course it can't---that's the whole point, after all. But a bulkhead fitting can be maintained...and as long as the "o" ring or flat seal are taken care of, then there are no worries about water ingress. Can stress occur on the male plug..sure, but that is easily remedied.
You last point is somewhat mystifing...are you suggesting that a bulkhead fitting does not have to be soldered to the main board in the same way a hard wired fitting does As a matter of fact, the amount of soldering is usually doubled on a machine with a bulkhead fitting. Plus, there is the cost of the fittings themselves...and they are not cheap.
I seriously doubt you have talked to an engineer, because you obviously don't understand electronic assembly. There are as many types of connectors as there are stars in the sky. Most are crimp style connectors which are easily assembled with a tool. If a connector is not easy to assemble, it will not sell. Period. When a manufacturer buys connectors, he doesn't buy one or two. He buys thousands of components at a time. The more parts you order, the cheaper they are.
Labor costs don't work that way. It takes a skilled worker X amount of hours to solder Y amount of wires. The worker gets paid by the hour, not by the number of solder joints he creates. Labor is a fixed cost, and it is expensive.
The Sea Hunter is soldered at every point a conductor attaches to the circuit board both from the headphone connector and the coil connector.
Also wrong about manufacturing costs. Hand soldering is THE most expensive operation in electronics manufacturing. The labor costs for the hard wiring are way more than the cost of a connector.