Welcome guest, is this your first visit?
Member
Discoveries
 
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree4Likes
  • 4 Post By Rick K

Thread: Rick’s Manta Manifesto

« Prev Thread | Next Thread »
  1. #1
    us
    Jan 2007
    Gold Canyon AZ
    ML SDC-2300, Fisher F-75, XP Deus,
    676
    589 times
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Rick’s Manta Manifesto

    I posted this a few minutes ago on another forum, in response to a question of whether a special purpose gold hunting beach PI like the Manta would be a machine that folks would buy and then not like.

    I think the answer is some will love it, some won’t. Pretty much like any other detector. You build PI machines which a lot of folks have used and most really love, but they are clearly not for everyone.

    Beach hunting is hard work and unless you live near the beach it is a thing you can only do when you infrequently travel to the beach. PI beach detectors have been on the market for decades. They are niche machines in beach detecting and beach machines are a niche within the overall detector market.

    Fisher’s primary challenge is to produce a machine which is light and elegant and lives up to the picture painted by enthusiastic folks on the forums.Their next challenge is to present it correctly. I am pretty sure that they don’t want every hunter who goes to the beach to buy one. FT are busy developing new platforms which will address the challenge posed by the latest crop of “go anywhere” detectors - water resistant VLF’s with salt beach capability (mostly but not exclusively multifrequency).

    If we look at existing PI water machines we see detectors with depth on low mineral beaches equal to or superior to machines like the Excal, CTX and CZ21 (on black sand or other mineralized beaches they clearly beat the VLF’s). The current machines lack any practical means of identifying iron. The result is that users often find that they end up digging more and deeper holes without increasing their finds. They also are no more sensitive to small gold than VLF’s which can operate in Salt. A lot of them end up being sold on or put in the closet, and the user either giving up beach detecting or reverting to a VLF. Some dedicated hunters, especially where mineralized beaches prevail continue to use them and get super results.

    The new Fisher PI will be a specialized tool. It’s for gold, just like a Minelab GPZ which costs $7000. The difference is that finding an ounce of gold nuggets is really, really hard. Lots of folks try for a year to find their first tiny one. Head to the beach with a good beach detector and the odds of finding gold are nowhere so remote - and the gold you find is in bigger chunks than the average nugget hunter will ever find.

    The Manta has two key characteristics which aim to make it a deadly gold hunter. First and most important, it claims to be more sensitive to ALL gold than any previous salt water detector. It does this by having an adjustable pulse delay control which goes down below 10 microseconds pulse delay - this has two effects, it enables finding smaller gold than any current detector in salt water and second Manta has more depth on all gold. All this sensitivity would be no good if weak target signals were swamped by circuit and ground noise. The Manta’s design has been refined and every design trade off made in the direction of extremely low noise, letting weak signal be heard.

    So, folks might say - OK maybe it will find more gold, but PI’s also hear every tiny flake of metal and drive me nuts and wear me out digging deep holes for nails, hairpins and aluminum trash.

    The feature of the Manta which has probably gotten the most attention is its ability to ID or eliminate ferrous targets. The iron ID/elimination capability of the Manta is based on the operation of its ground balance system. This function puts iron and high conductors into the excluded “bucket” (it has two modes, no return or multitone) and puts low conductors - gold jewelry and aluminum - into another “bucket”. The degree of operation of this feature is variable from “all metal” level through increasing amounts of rejection. Use of this will greatly reduce or eliminate digging ferrous junk. Unlike the primitive iron ID of the Minelab GPX machines, this feature works to nearly full detecting depth of the machine. Since it works on the strength of the return signal, vs. its phase shift, it will likely eliminate those dreaded smashed and ripped deep aluminum cans.

    At high levels, the largest ferrous targets and other targets with high conductivity are rejected. With use of the ferrous rejection feature clad and silver coins are excluded. Not so great for “clad stabbing” The testing so far has concentrated on finding gold in the water and France doesn’t have recent high conductor coinage. The use of iron ID when silver is the target may work fine by adjusting the pulse delay to a higher value and choosing a lower level of iron exclusion, or it may be necessary to hunt in all metal with a high pulse delay value to eliminate small ferrous and all aluminum. In any event, LE JAG has reported that in his 3 years or so of testing and using successive Manta prototypes he has mainly operated in all metal - stating that most iron gives a double “blip” especially if the coil is lifted slightly. In this mode, silver and clad are detected, just like everything else.

    Using the Manta for gold in salt will be just like any other beach machine in one way - the user will have to adapt control settings and search techniques to extract the maximum information from the ground and to make effective use of his time and energy. Fisher’s argument is that between the gold finding power of the Manta and it’s abilities to avoid digging ferrous junk, it will obsolete all previous PI beach machines and outperform any current beach machine of any type - tall order, we will see if it measures up.

    The upcoming testing of pre-production machines here in North America will no doubt clearly reveal the best use of the machine’s capabilities - When that data is in, I’m pretty sure Fisher’s advertising and social media information on the PI will reflect its strengths and limitations. They are well aware this is not a mass-market machine. I suspect also that they are putting off setting a price target for this until they have a firmer grasp on the scope of its usefulness and appeal. The GPZ costs $7000 - why? - because it finds gold nuggets better than any other detector in the world and gold is valuable - Minelab charges a kind of tax on gold. If the Manta can demonstrate that it really finds gold jewelry in salt water better than any machine in the world it will totally dominate an admittedly niche market - fortunately, I doubt that Fisher is interested in “taxing gold” - so I’m sure the price will be much more reasonable.

    Rick Kempf
    __________________

  2. #2
    us
    Mar 2012
    Spring TX
    CTX3030/F75LTD/ Garrett AtPro/ XP Deus
    6,270
    950 times
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting
    Great read, exciting times ahead!

    Wayne

    www.metaldetectingstuff.com

  3. #3
    OBN
    OBN is offline
    us
    Dec 2008
    Mid-Atlantic Waters
    Excalibur
    5,843
    5210 times
    2019...Gold rings..72..Misc/gold 4.....Silver/Sterling 174
    Honorable Mentions (1)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick K View Post
    extremely low noise, letting weak signal be heard.
    __________________

    Effort is Important, But knowing where, can make all the difference!





  4. #4
    us
    "Dew" Meeker

    Mar 2006
    Gulf Coast, Fl
    MDT, Nox, Blue Xcals and CTX
    2,014
    1034 times
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting
    Honorable Mentions (4)
    Joe.... im from Missouri.....but ive got my fingers crossed on this one. Theres been some promising posts. I just dont want to stand in a 10X10 square digging trash like most PIs. Because here in Fl during recent drop periods you have to be able to move along as well. We dont however have a lot of minerals....... so i hope it lives up to the depth and sensitivity currently being promissed. Looks like the sand isnt going away........ so the Manta and a back hoe maybe the answer.

  5. #5
    us
    Jan 2007
    Gold Canyon AZ
    ML SDC-2300, Fisher F-75, XP Deus,
    676
    589 times
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting
    We all hope that this thing lives up to its promise. I have a good feeling about it. Tom Walsh - the boss at First Texas - is playing with his own money - it’s a closely held corporation. It’s none of my business what it cost him to “corral” the Manta herd, but Tom wouldn’t have spent the money if he wasn’t pretty confident it was a sure thing.

  6. #6
    us
    May 2014
    Wilmington NC
    Nox 600; CTX; Fisher CZ21; Minelab Excalibur II; White's Surf PI DF; 920i Stealth Scoop
    626
    519 times
    Beach and Shallow Water Hunting
    Quote Originally Posted by dewcon4414 View Post
    Because here in Fl during recent drop periods you have to be able to move along as well. We dont however have a lot of minerals....... so i hope it lives up to the depth and sensitivity currently being promissed. Looks like the sand isnt going away........ so the Manta and a back hoe maybe the answer.
    This is what I will be waiting to hear as well. We have the same sand here in NC. Having said that, I have heard machines like the TDI are way deeper than my other machines. I never noticed a depth difference with my DF though and in my depth tests it was always nearly even with the CZ/Excal.

 

 

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Rick James
    By jeff of pa in forum Music
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Aug 15, 2017, 12:05 AM
  2. Manta PI - another video
    By Rick K in forum Beach and Shallow Water
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Jul 16, 2017, 10:26 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Dec 10, 2015, 10:12 AM
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.3.0