|
-
Jan 04, 2012, 01:09 AM
#1
-
Jan 04, 2012, 08:28 AM
#2
-
Jan 04, 2012, 09:18 AM
#3
 "It's only after we find it that archeologist know it exist!"
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
Could Glass have played a role in the Beale story?
"The beach is my new office."
-
Jan 04, 2012, 12:51 PM
#4
-
Jan 04, 2012, 01:03 PM
#5
-
Jan 04, 2012, 03:55 PM
#6
 "It's only after we find it that archeologist know it exist!"
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
"The beach is my new office."
-
Jan 04, 2012, 07:31 PM
#7
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
 Originally Posted by bigscoop
Could Glass have played a role in the Beale story?
That is one of the points I was getting at. And I think it was the Long expidition that ran into the bad winter if I remember right.
-
Jan 04, 2012, 09:44 PM
#8
-
Jan 04, 2012, 10:28 PM
#9
 "It's only after we find it that archeologist know it exist!"
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
 Originally Posted by Rebel - KGC
There were a lot of circumstances leading up to that event. Long was something of a rouge, as it were. I believe you'll find that he was acting on his own without US authority or approval.
"The beach is my new office."
-
Jan 05, 2012, 07:35 AM
#10
-
Jan 05, 2012, 08:31 AM
#11
 "It's only after we find it that archeologist know it exist!"
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
To be sure, they were both a bit rouge. There are a lot of potential wealthy key figures who were involved in that territory, either directly or indirectly, once you start looking deeper. Several big bankers were even playing their hands and investing in the Texas region. "A lot of sources for big money ventures." The most notable of these was George Graham, not only did he visit the Galveston region of Texas but he, along with a few others, may have even influenced Long's failed campaigns. I think it's even pretty safe to say that this was the actual case.
"The beach is my new office."
-
Jan 05, 2012, 12:44 PM
#12
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
WHAT years are you talking about?
-
Jan 05, 2012, 04:23 PM
#13
 "It's only after we find it that archeologist know it exist!"
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
"The beach is my new office."
-
Jan 05, 2012, 06:56 PM
#14
-
Jan 05, 2012, 07:19 PM
#15
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
1817-1821.....sounds like the same thing with wealthy people today. Do what they want, when they want, and with who they want. And could still buy their way outta things .
HH Jay
-
Jan 07, 2012, 08:17 AM
#16
-
Jan 08, 2012, 01:19 AM
#17
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
Couldnt have said it better myself
-
Jan 20, 2012, 08:28 PM
#18
-
Jan 22, 2012, 06:20 PM
#19
 "It's only after we find it that archeologist know it exist!"
Re: St Louis and the year 1821?!?!?!?!????
 Originally Posted by Rebel - KGC
 Originally Posted by tat2guy
1817-1821.....sounds like the same thing with wealthy people today. Do what they want, when they want, and with who they want. And could still buy their way outta things  .
HH Jay
It's all pretty fascinating to explore. There was also a lot of silent, behind the scenes big money interest in land speculation schemes as well. When you think of Burr, the French, all the self appointed rouges and wannabe rulers, the schemers, the politics,....there was a lot going on in the region during the period in question, most of it requiring a great deal of advanced planning and financial support. Military support was also something that was frequently desired and/or required and a lot of militia took on the role as what might better be called, mercenaries for hire and/or potential profit. Though the Monroe Doctrine is usually associated with the troubles of Florida, it probably wasn't the only territory on Monroe's mind when he drafted that document.
"The beach is my new office."
-
Jan 23, 2012, 07:36 AM
#20
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|