Mar 29, 2012, 11:37 PM
I am going to give a opinion,and hope I don't ruffle any feathers,If I was going to design a code like supposely Beale done,I would make it like a comanation lock,by first putting like he did contents,then I would make another code using some form of the contents code to give names,then you would have to use contents code with name code in order to break location code.,in Beale case I would have made code 2,then you would have to use that code to break code 3,then use code 2 and 3 to break code 1. What does everyone else think? Just my opinion.....KenMor
Mar 29, 2012 11:37 PM
Mar 30, 2012, 06:38 AM
(WINK) MHO... TOO much focus on BC # 1, 2, & 3; look at history of Lynchburg, Bedford, Botetourt County, VIRGINIA "areas". (GRIN).
Last edited by Rebel - KGC; Mar 30, 2012 at 09:14 AM.
Mar 30, 2012, 07:08 AM
Don't mind Reb, he's just worried to death that the truth behind the local lore may not be all that local.
Originally Posted by kenmor
What you suggest is reasonable. C1 would certainly have been the most important cipher and the one needing the most protection.
Mar 30, 2012, 09:18 AM
(CHEESY GRIN) SMIRKING at B.S.; have YOU solved it then? NOT worried... ALL you guys have are the BC # 1, 2, & 3. LOL! GA (Go AHEAD)... waste YOUR TIME; probably ALREADY found & utilized. (WINK).