Beale codes

[kenmor]

I am going to give a opinion,and hope I don't ruffle any feathers,If I was going to design a code like supposely Beale done,I would make it like a comanation lock,by first putting like he did contents,then I would make another code using some form of the contents code to give names,then you would have to use contents code with name code in order to break location code.,in Beale case I would have made code 2,then you would have to use that code to break code 3,then use code 2 and 3 to break code 1. What does everyone else think? Just my opinion.....KenMor

[Ads]

TreasureNet.com is the premier Treasure Hunting Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!

[Rebel - KGC]

(WINK) MHO... TOO much focus on BC # 1, 2, & 3; look at history of Lynchburg, Bedford, Botetourt County, VIRGINIA "areas". (GRIN).

[bigscoop]

I am going to give a opinion,and hope I don't ruffle any feathers,If I was going to design a code like supposely Beale done,I would make it like a comanation lock,by first putting like he did contents,then I would make another code using some form of the contents code to give names,then you would have to use contents code with name code in order to break location code.,in Beale case I would have made code 2,then you would have to use that code to break code 3,then use code 2 and 3 to break code 1. What does everyone else think? Just my opinion.....KenMor

Don't mind Reb, he's just worried to death that the truth behind the local lore may not be all that local.

What you suggest is reasonable. C1 would certainly have been the most important cipher and the one needing the most protection.

[Rebel - KGC]

(CHEESY GRIN) SMIRKING at B.S.; have YOU solved it then? NOT worried... ALL you guys have are the BC # 1, 2, & 3. LOL! GA (Go AHEAD)... waste YOUR TIME; probably ALREADY found & utilized. (WINK).