Help with age of Ball jar please

SkyPirate

Bronze Member
Mar 31, 2009
1,861
83
Raleigh North Carolina
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Pro, Garrett ProPointer
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • ball1.jpg
    ball1.jpg
    34.5 KB · Views: 1,298
  • ball2.jpg
    ball2.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 6,569
  • ball3.jpg
    ball3.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 1,108

jgas

Silver Member
Apr 23, 2008
3,793
2,469
Midwesterner
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
DFX, Pro 6000XL, SunRay Probe, Centech Pinpointer
Let's see, Mason and Ball are from the same maker I believe. So Nov. 30th 1858 was the patent on the Mason jar screw toppers.. I would say yours dates to around 1880's I believe. But that is an "uneducated" guesstimate! :thumbsup: jgas
 

OP
OP
SkyPirate

SkyPirate

Bronze Member
Mar 31, 2009
1,861
83
Raleigh North Carolina
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Pro, Garrett ProPointer
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Road Dog said:
This might help.

Thanks, it's definitely the 1896-1910 version. :notworthy: Now I know another great old place to do some detecting!
 

72cheyenne

Bronze Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,463
25
Mansfield, Arkansas
Detector(s) used
Minelab E-trac, White's M6, White's 6000di/pro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
From the Redbook No. 10 Collectors Guide to Fruit Jars by Douglas M. Leybourne, Jr. 2008

RB #234
Ball (script, 3-L Loop, Dropped A) MASON
Smooth lip Mason shoulder seal
Circa: Early 1900's to 1910

Ball Blue Qt. $1-2


Hope this helps. The Redbook is considered "the source" for fruit jar collectors. Redbook No. 10 is the latest eddition.
 

72cheyenne

Bronze Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,463
25
Mansfield, Arkansas
Detector(s) used
Minelab E-trac, White's M6, White's 6000di/pro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
SWR said:
Red Book #7 lists this variety as RB #280.

I did not realize Doug was now dating common jars in his newer versions. I'll have to update :wink:

Is that ball blue, or aqua? Hard to tell on this screen :wink:

I actually didn't spend a whole lot of time looking at all the variants of the "Ball Mason" type jar, mainly because I don't have the jar in hand. I just listed the "most common" one. I can't tell for sure from the photo if it is the 3-L loop & dropped A embossing or just plain script & dropped A. All the other listings for the 3-L loop & dropped A also showed the same date range. If it is just the script type embossing then it is a newer than 1910 jar. And yes, all listings in the new book show a "circa" date range when known. I see a whole lot of these jars in both Ball blue and aqua, so its a toss up as to its true color. Just best guessing from the photo. It "looks" more Ball blue to me. Like you said its hard to tell from the screen, but value wise it don't matter either way.

Going back to what you said earlier about the base, it does look like a newer type base. Maybe they re-tooled some old molds and made a later run. Who knows for sure.
 

halfdime

Silver Member
Oct 31, 2006
4,496
1,419
Zelienople
Detector(s) used
White's XLT
Road Dog said:
This might help.
Going by these graphics, the jar I found yesterday would be from the 1923-33 era then?
 

Attachments

  • pepsiball 001 (Small).jpg
    pepsiball 001 (Small).jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 1,134

72cheyenne

Bronze Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,463
25
Mansfield, Arkansas
Detector(s) used
Minelab E-trac, White's M6, White's 6000di/pro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Correct. Circa 1923-1933. Listed as RB #277 in the Redbook No. 10 Collectors Guide to Fruit Jars by Douglas M. Leybourne, Jr. 2008. Value, about $1. Very common, but nice jar. :thumbsup:
 

creeper71

Silver Member
Dec 5, 2007
2,936
61
South Central PA
72cheyenne said:
Correct. Circa 1923-1933. Listed as RB #277 in the Redbook No. 10 Collectors Guide to Fruit Jars by Douglas M. Leybourne, Jr. 2008. Value, about $1. Very common, but nice jar. :thumbsup:
Cheyenne, how much of a price difference is there from the No.9 an the Number 10? I bought the No.9 from a friend about a month ago an then went to bottle show next day an they had no.10 there but I passed on it... so I am wondering did I mess up by not buying the NO.10 or is the prices about the same as the no.9?
 

72cheyenne

Bronze Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,463
25
Mansfield, Arkansas
Detector(s) used
Minelab E-trac, White's M6, White's 6000di/pro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
creeper71 said:
72cheyenne said:
Correct. Circa 1923-1933. Listed as RB #277 in the Redbook No. 10 Collectors Guide to Fruit Jars by Douglas M. Leybourne, Jr. 2008. Value, about $1. Very common, but nice jar. :thumbsup:
Cheyenne, how much of a price difference is there from the No.9 an the Number 10? I bought the No.9 from a friend about a month ago an then went to bottle show next day an they had no.10 there but I passed on it... so I am wondering did I mess up by not buying the NO.10 or is the prices about the same as the no.9?

creeper, I don't have the book in front of me at the moment, but I seem to remember Doug writing in the forward that the common and most mid-range jars have stayed the same, although some have decreased in value due to more becoming known or lack of demand, and that the high-end and colorful jars have actually increased a bit and continue to have a strong following within the collector circles. Probably the biggest difference between RB#9 and #10 are the additional listings, both for embossings and colors. I would imagine that if one was not an avid jar collector that they wouldn't notice much of a difference between the two.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Top