|
-
May 09, 2006, 12:06 AM
#1
Cache hunting detectors
I have been metal detecting for about 20 years, but want to expand into cache hunting. I have been looking at 2 box machines, but know nothing about them. Could I get some opinions on what two box machines people in this forum are using and why you think the one you use is best?
Ringmangs
-
May 09, 2006, 10:32 AM
#2
Re: Cache hunting detectors
[RingmanGS
I have been metal detecting for about 20 years, but want to expand into cache hunting. I have been looking at 2 box machines, but know nothing about them. Could I get some opinions on what two box machines people in this forum are using and why you think the one you use is best?
Ringmangs
**************
For twe boxs, go "Discovery", best buy for money and sensitivity.
Till Euenspiegle de La Mancha
"I exist to live, not live to exist"
-
May 09, 2006, 11:44 AM
#3
 monty
Re: Cache hunting detectors
I don't know much about heavy duty cache hunting, but I have seen several favorable posts regarding the Garrett 2500 and the two box adapter. This seems to be the poor mans way of hunting where you don't have to spend thousands of dollars to reach a depth of 15 to 20 feet. Monty
Don't make me loose the hounds! If you dig, Cover up your holes.
-
May 10, 2006, 08:30 AM
#4
 Director-Search & Recovery Team of Oakland County.
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Monty is right about the Garrett and a two box setup. It is deep for metal objects the size of a pistol and larger. Some PI machines are very deep but don't compare to a 2 box. The older Garrett ADS with a Two box also work very well and I still have mine.
(C) Sandman, 2005. All Rights Reserved.
"TIME IS THE ONLY THING YOU NEVER GET BACK, WHY WASTE IT SWINGING A DETECTOR THAT ISN'T UP TO THE TASK."
-
May 10, 2006, 09:24 AM
#5
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Thanks for all the input. I currently use a Whites XLT so I was looking at the Whites TM 808, any input on the Whites TM 808?
I looked at the Discovery and the Garrett. I kinda like the Garrett. The GTI 2500 with TreasureHound EagleEye Coil would give me the 2 box plus a back up detector.
How deep are most cache found, like jars or boxes of coins? Would my XLT go deep enough for them or would you still recommend a 2 box machine?
RingmanGS
-
May 10, 2006, 06:00 PM
#6
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Hey Ringman,
The White's TM808 is the same as the Discovery TF900 - Discovery made them both. Either are better than the Gemini.
As far as depth, you should be able to find a jar/box of coins with a regular detector. Most caches of that nature were buried within reach up to your elbow. But you'll be all day digging up every signal with a regular detector. The advantage of a two box or pulse induction loop detector is that you can ignore the smaller signals and find only the larger objects. This makes for faster searching when cache hunting.
Sandman, what do you mean when you say a pulse induction doesn't compare to a two box? I own both and I would much prefer my pi unit than my TF900. There are less false signals. I was just curious about your thoughts.
fyi, two box summary from the old forum here:
http://www.treasurenet.com/forum/met.../1041031.shtml
All the best,
Darren
-
Jun 13, 2006, 09:06 AM
#7
Re: Cache hunting detectors
I don't mean to be a wise guy or something, but why do you really need a two box? Do you really think there is treasure buried 15 or 20 feet deep? Forget about those dreams of finding Blackbeard's treasure. It's a waste of time.
It is probanly true that most caches are buried about one to two feet deep. But any old detector won't find them. I would forget about the XLT for cache hunting. It might possibly find a jar of coins a foot deep. Similarly. the DFX might find something that deep. But you don't want to take a chance on missing a nice cache with those detectors, and they will miss them sometimes. I don't want to make this a commercial, but the best detector for finding caches is the Minelab Explorer, as far as I'm concerned. It won't miss a cache.
-
Jun 14, 2006, 12:46 PM
#8
Re: Cache hunting detectors
"I exist to live, not live to exist"
-
Jun 14, 2006, 06:29 PM
#9
 Diggin' It
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Hey guys, how about the Garrett CXPlus with the depth multiplier? It's a two box that also works as an excellent cache machine with the coil, right?
-
Jun 16, 2006, 12:31 AM
#10
Re: Cache hunting detectors
JoeMoto
Hey guys, how about the Garrett CXPlus with the depth multiplier? It's a two box that also works as an excellent cache machine with the coil, right?
************
orthe old Master hunter with the blood hound , correct JOE]
Tropical Tramp
"I exist to live, not live to exist"
-
Jun 16, 2006, 12:40 PM
#11
Re: Cache hunting detectors
just do not get the Gemini 3 two box detector.
I had one, and I was not happy with it.
To protect our hobby, always fill the holes you dig.
-
Jun 16, 2006, 12:51 PM
#12
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Years ago I had a SPARK GAP MD. It was a 2 box unit that was very very heavy and took a car battery to operate. The 2 boxes were about 5 feet apart and hunf off a metal rod you carried over your shoulder. I also underatand that this produced Radation and was outlawed. You talk about going deep man did this thing go deep.
Peg Leg
-
Jun 16, 2006, 03:58 PM
#13
Re: Cache hunting detectors
[Peg Leg
Years ago I had a SPARK GAP MD. It was a 2 box unit that was very very heavy and took a car battery to operate. The 2 boxes were about 5 feet apart and hunf off a metal rod you carried over your shoulder. I also underatand that this produced Radation and was outlawed. You talk about going deep man did this thing go deep.
Peg Leg
************
Geeeze pegger, that would have to be in the 20's
Tropical Tramp
"I exist to live, not live to exist"
-
Jun 16, 2006, 10:59 PM
#14
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Tayopa, Spark gaps were made in the twenties and the early 1930s and used up to the fifties by the older guys. KvM had one that he demonstrated at the Shepherds Mall Treasure Shows in the sixties and seventies. To close you can cache hunt with any detector. If you want to better your chances of cache recovery go with the advice that's been posted on this thread. I don't personally use any two box detector for obvious reasons. KvM used and endorsed in this order ... Fisher T-10 BFO; White's Treasure Master BFO; Garrett Master Hunter BFO; Metrotech M-330A two box and then he moved to the newer stuff and I stopped paying attention. Montana Larry Campbell made a major fortune with his Metrotech 220A and I assume but do not know for sure that he also used the 330-A. At the time no one was sending me free detectors and it made more sense to just get the most out of what I had than to chase after the next big thing. exanimo, ss
"We have done so much; for so many; for so long; with so little; that pretty soon we'll be able to do anything; with nothing at all."
my unit motto - 138th Aviation Company - 224th Aviation Battalion - Phu Bai, I Corps, Republic of Vietnam - 1972
Siegfried Schlagrule
-
Jun 17, 2006, 04:55 AM
#15
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Hello I come from Europe and I m new on this forum.
I would like to ask you if anyone has a long range metal detector THE RAVEN? If someone has expiriences with it i would be happy to share it with me.What is your oppinion about long range metal detectors?Do they work or its better to buy a two box??
http://www.treasurenow.com/html/TheRaven.html
-
Jun 17, 2006, 12:50 PM
#16
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Years ago I bought a two box from a company called Hayes Electronics. It is a company in Arizona. Do not remember where. They advertised in the back of W&ET. Don't know if they are still around.
Good well made 2 box at a fair price.
ericwt
I am looking for Pandora's Box. I have got to see what is inside.
Proud to be Rogue.
Expedition Central America: T minus 2 months and counting!
This time with Satellite Internet connection!
-
Jun 17, 2006, 03:27 PM
#17
Re: Cache hunting detectors
I dont know what to buy...garrett gti 2500 with eagle eye or long range detector..
-
Jun 17, 2006, 04:55 PM
#18
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Well over on Gary's and Carl's websites they have been doing testing on coin hoards(no iron)
http://thunting.com/geotech/forums/s...ad.php?t=11730
http://www.garysdetecting.co.uk/hoard_test.htm
They haven't found a VLF, PI or 2 box yet that would detect them. No wonder caches are hard to find.
Carl's second round of testing is due shortly.
Makes you kind of wonder if just waving a forked stick would be just as effective as a lot of "cache" detectors would be.
George
-
Jun 17, 2006, 10:47 PM
#19
Re: Cache hunting detectors
fleamistress: Mine looks like a Fisher Gememi 3. It is a detector for finding anything metal that it deep.
A lot of people have said that 2 boxes don't work. They are incorrect. They take lots of learning and practice. Plus you must be over a cache to discover it.
bakergeol: I will check out that out. However I know for fact they do work. Fisher has been selling them for over 30 years.
I am looking for Pandora's Box. I have got to see what is inside.
Proud to be Rogue.
Expedition Central America: T minus 2 months and counting!
This time with Satellite Internet connection!
-
Jun 18, 2006, 03:52 PM
#20
Re: Cache hunting detectors
Is here anyone who uses long range metal detector (treasure locator)?
Some people say that these locators are fake....some of them say they are very good.....dont know who to believe 
I would be glad to help me
Regards from Europe
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
cache hunting with metal detectors
Click on a term to search for related topics.
|