Welcome guest, is this your first visit?
Member
Discoveries
 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29
  1. #1
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Hello Guys,
    I've read a lot about White's DFX and Minelab Explorer II, the both of them seem to be the best machines. I'm going to buy one of them. The targets will be caches burried up to 1 meter with the size more then soda can and also gold nuggets more then 1 gram.

    I know that explorer II seems "a bit" deeper seeking machine then dfx? How much will be this "a bit"? is that true? or that depands on the settings and the technic of seeking?

    also I know that dfx is much better on gold nugget then explorer II , is that true?

    one more note, I'll be using 12" or wider coils for cache hunting and the standard (8") coils for nugget hunting

    please post any comments.
    In advance thank you.

  2. #2
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Don't you have any idea?

  3. #3
    us
    Apr 2008
    Central California
    4,022

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    TreasureGrabber;

    Wouldn't it be more interesting to compare the two current top models?

    White's DFX 300
    http://hobby.us.whiteselectronics.co...view/2056/469/

    and

    Ecplorer SE Pro
    http://www.minelab.com/consumer/page...ofessional&x=y

    Sincerely,
    eethr
    An evil group is comprised of the insane, who, out of fear, imagine that they must conspire to destroy those who are honest and able. A good group is made up of honest people, who could each survive on their own, yet work together openly for betterment for themselves and others.

  4. #4
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    EE THr ,
    the models you have suggested are the best without any doubts, The opinions will be very interesting about them, but I'm going to buy DFX or explorer II,
    also dfx 300 and EXP SE are newest models and I don't know if people have much experience on them.

    Anyway any comments are welcome including DFX 300 and Explorer SE

  5. #5

    May 2008
    new mexico
    6000xlpro
    200

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    since detectors came out people have tried to compare. it always comes down to one thing. the best one is the one you like to use and the one you will learn to use. people out there running around with 4k detectors and cant find their zipper to go to the bathroom. have kids out using 100 dollar units and finding gold and silver.

  6. #6
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    al-nm,
    But I mean the both of detectors in the hands of experienced user.... in the same conditions...

  7. #7

    Mar 2005
    Minelab Explorer SE/Garrett GTI 2500/ Ace 250
    6,896
    1 times

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    for strictly cache hunting and prospecting, i wouldnt choose either. i would go with a Garrett GTI 2500, get the depth multiplier for the caches. that setup will destroy both the Whites and the Minelab for depth on a large target. one meter (3` is beyond what the Minelab or the Whites can do in my opinion, even with a 12" coil unless the target is huge)
    GTI 2500/ACE 250

  8. #8
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    hollowpointred,
    will GTI 2500 do better than DFX and Exp II on gold nuggets over 1gram?

    How do you think , what will be maximum depth for DFX and Exp II on the soda can targets?


  9. #9
    mx
    Nov 2004
    Alamos,Sonora,Mexico
    8,703
    8 times

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    HI: what you are asking for is strictly a compromise. You have to decide if you want small gold nuggetts or fair sized, deep caches. It is rarther like asking for an automobile which will fulfuill a sport / Utility/ general hauling, and luxury car specifications..

    If you want fine Gold, aqnd shallow caches, either of them will do nicely. If You want big caches, the Garrett will outshine them for medium deep caches on, and will possibly hold it's own on Gold pickers in the 1 gram + sze..

    Secondary thing / thought , balance. Can you swing a 12" coil all day long? You can swing a Garrett with the depth finder all day long. Caches require long periods if you expect success, plus, remember, most big caches are in the brush, a 12 " coils is difficult to maneuver there.. The Garrett is also, but it is less sensitive to heigth above the ground and jarring.

    Incidentally, where do you expect to find 1 gram Gold nuggetts in quantity? I would suyggest finding the Gold Placer field first, then going from there.

    Hollow point is correct listen to him, I do.

    Don Jose de La Mancha
    "I exist to live, not live to exist"

  10. #10
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Real de Tayopa,
    do you mean that garret gti 2500 will outshine dfx and exp 2 without being two box? just in one coil option? or with it?

  11. #11
    mx
    Nov 2004
    Alamos,Sonora,Mexico
    8,703
    8 times

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Fo which operation ?

    D J d L M
    "I exist to live, not live to exist"

  12. #12
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    do you mean that, garret gti will beat the dfx and exp in cache hunting with two box mode? and in nugget shooting with one coil mode?

    if yes, it should be really universal machine...

    also how do you think , which will perform better GTI, DFX or EXP II on caches and on nuggets in one coil mode? I think on nuggets DFX on caches EXP II... but with 12"+ coils DFX and EXP II may be similar on caches... so DFX may be better... or EXP II is much better on caches and am I mistaken?

  13. #13

    Mar 2005
    Minelab Explorer SE/Garrett GTI 2500/ Ace 250
    6,896
    1 times

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Quote Originally Posted by TreasureGrabber
    do you mean that, garret gti will beat the dfx and exp in cache hunting with two box mode? and in nugget shooting with one coil mode?

    if yes, it should be really universal machine...

    also how do you think , which will perform better GTI, DFX or EXP II on caches and on nuggets in one coil mode? I think on nuggets DFX on caches EXP II... but with 12"+ coils DFX and EXP II may be similar on caches... so DFX may be better... or EXP II is much better on caches and am I mistaken?
    in my opinion the two box Garrett will do much better in depth for large targets than either the whites or minelab with a 12" coil installed on either. with 12" coils on all three,thats a tough one. i would say its a tie between the minelab and the whites with a slight edge to the minelab. with a coil looking for nuggets, that is also a tough one. i would go with the minelab first due to its reputation with difficult soil, followed by a tie between the Garrett and the Whites. really all three are excellent machines, but if you plan on doing lots of cache hunting, i would invest in a Garrett with the depth multiplier. it will do both jobs.



    Quote Originally Posted by Real de Tayopa

    Hollow point is correct listen to him, I do.

    Don Jose de La Mancha

    not bad advice for being a lame brain eh! thanks for the kind words!
    GTI 2500/ACE 250

  14. #14
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    hollowpointred,
    Thank you very much for such a full answer.
    I've one more question, How practical is two box Garret? I mean in nerrow places such as rocks, forests, caves and similar places how practical is it? also what is minimal size of the subject it will find with two box mode? and what is minimal depth it will find the mentioned subject?

  15. #15

    Mar 2005
    Minelab Explorer SE/Garrett GTI 2500/ Ace 250
    6,896
    1 times

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    see for yourself. perhaps Garrett themselves can better answer your other questions. http://www.garrett.com/hobby/home.htm
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    GTI 2500/ACE 250

  16. #16
    us
    DFCA

    Dec 2006
    Kansas
    Minelab E-trac
    5,892
    Banner Finds (1)

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    the DFX 300 and the DFX are the same control box. the 300 comes with a 12 super coil, the other is the standard 950. I'm not sure about the SE
    what's more important to you, finding gold, or finding chache ?
    if you want gold, get a gold machine. if it's cache, buy a good all-around MD, either way. the important thing is to learn you MD and listen to it

  17. #17
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Thanks guys for all your comments, but it seems that two box detector including Garret GTI 2500 seems very unprectical for my purposes...

    Some say that DFX is better on gold nuggets then EXP II...
    and EXP II is better then DFX on caches...

    hollowpointred, says that EXP II is better in both cases...

    what do you think?


  18. #18

    Mar 2005
    Minelab Explorer SE/Garrett GTI 2500/ Ace 250
    6,896
    1 times

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Quote Originally Posted by TreasureGrabber
    Thanks guys for all your comments, but it seems that two box detector including Garret GTI 2500 seems very unprectical for my purposes...

    Some say that DFX is better on gold nuggets then EXP II...
    and EXP II is better then DFX on caches...

    hollowpointred, says that EXP II is better in both cases...

    what do you think?

    pretty close actually. only slight differences.
    GTI 2500/ACE 250

  19. #19
    mx
    Nov 2004
    Alamos,Sonora,Mexico
    8,703
    8 times

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    HI" I would suggest opening up the manufacturers data on each first, including comparitive charts, then go from there on questions.

    Remember the most important factor is the operator, no different than Daytona racing. A good operator can iron out radical differences.

    Don Jose de La Mancha
    "I exist to live, not live to exist"

  20. #20
    ge
    Jul 2006
    Bounty Hunter Landstar, Minelab Explorer SE
    94
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: White's DFX vs Minelab Explorer II

    Hello Guys,
    What do you think about DFX and MXT? Is MXT as good as or better then DFX on caches?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

whites dfx cache hunting

,

whites dfx or minelab explorer ii

Click on a term to search for related topics.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3