|
-
Dec 02, 2009, 12:41 PM
#1
I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
NEVER VOTE FOR THE BANNER FOR CRH FINDS!!!!!!
Now lots of people are gonna try it that would of never thought of it before.
-
Dec 02, 2009, 12:45 PM
#2
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
To each his own. Its not like its a CRHing is huge secret, there are hundreds of other web forums that address CRH and what people find. If you feel that this draws unwanted attention, dont post it. Many will try, few will stick with it after getting clad all day. I personally like seeing what others find. To make a banner is a reward for someones hard work.
Month (April)/Year
2012 CRH Totals:
War Nickel: 0/0 Roos: 0/0 Merc: 0/0 WLH: 0/0 Bens: 0/6
90% JFK: 0/25 40% JFK: 0/107
-
Dec 02, 2009, 01:08 PM
#3
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by AGCoinHunter
To make a banner is a reward for someones hard work.
Seriously though he said he spent 6 min. in the bank and walks away with over 3k in silver. Many will try After reading that.
Mojo
CRH Mojo "Thanks For buying American"
-
Dec 02, 2009, 01:32 PM
#4
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by coinmojo
 Originally Posted by AGCoinHunter
To make a banner is a reward for someones hard work.
Seriously though he said he spent 6 min. in the bank and walks away with over 3k in silver. Many will try After reading that.
Mojo
I agree, never vote crh finds for the banner.
We chased our pleasures here - dug our treasures there
JM
-
Dec 02, 2009, 01:42 PM
#5
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by coinmojo
 Originally Posted by AGCoinHunter
To make a banner is a reward for someones hard work.
Seriously though he said he spent 6 min. in the bank and walks away with over 3k in silver. Many will try After reading that.
Mojo
I guarantee you that he has spent more than 6 minutes searching for this. He has spend many hours/days. Just so happened he got lucky in this 6 minutes. All of us dream of this kind of find and may spend a lifetime looking for it. Most will fail.
Month (April)/Year
2012 CRH Totals:
War Nickel: 0/0 Roos: 0/0 Merc: 0/0 WLH: 0/0 Bens: 0/6
90% JFK: 0/25 40% JFK: 0/107
-
Dec 02, 2009, 01:53 PM
#6
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
...I agree, no more banner finds...
HH
-GC
-
Dec 02, 2009, 02:29 PM
#7
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
The banner's labelend "Recent Discoveries by Our Members." Is a thousand silver halves not a discovery? If you eyeballed a box full of Morgan dollars while detecting a field, should that not be considered a banner find becasue you didn't dig it up?
We all know there's no such thing as a "hunted out" location. Let's stop using that phrase to describe a park out of which you just dug a pile of coins! Obviously that particular place wasn't "hunted out", right?
-
Dec 02, 2009, 03:32 PM
#8
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by TreasureFiend
NEVER VOTE FOR THE BANNER FOR CRH FINDS!!!!!!
Now lots of people are gonna try it that would of never thought of it before.
agree
jeffk
if theirs treasure I will find it!!!
-
Dec 02, 2009, 03:40 PM
#9
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
Oldest coin - 1700's Spanish silver piece of 8 reale
Oldest U.S. silver - 1833 Capped Bust Half Dime
Oldest U.S. copper - 1847 Large cent
Civil War best finds:
*NC officers belt buckle
*CSN Confederate Navy Officer button
*Eagle Sword Belt Plate
-
Dec 02, 2009, 03:41 PM
#10
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
I agree after my big silver hit this spring I dont put up any pics every now and then ill discuss a few finds but no pix and definatley no banner I already thought that was a no no
-
Dec 02, 2009, 03:44 PM
#11
 da book worm--researcher
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
CRHing is like playing the lotto ==many try , some get little winners --once in very great while someone hits big time. --- we all dream it'll be us in the winners circle one day.
-
Dec 02, 2009, 03:59 PM
#12
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by goldencoin
...I agree, no more banner finds...
HH
-GC
Curious goldencoin, what was your banner find for?
Month (April)/Year
2012 CRH Totals:
War Nickel: 0/0 Roos: 0/0 Merc: 0/0 WLH: 0/0 Bens: 0/6
90% JFK: 0/25 40% JFK: 0/107
-
Dec 02, 2009, 04:15 PM
#13
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
Metal detecting. The right field, the right conditions, detecting from the right direction, all of these factors can influence whether or not you hit the big find.
CRHing. The right bank, the right day, the right teller, all of these factors can influence whether or not you hit the big find.
You can spend a lot on a metal detector.
Same for CRHing (though you can recycle the same funds over and over, so a tiny bit different.)
You can't get out to detect every day.
Same for CRHing.
You can spend hours detecting to find one good coin.
Same for CRHing.
You might drive for hours to find the right detecting spot.
Same for CRHing.
You'll get turned down sometimes when asking to hunt a great detecting location.
Same for CRHing.
You may find one good coin while detecting, or find a whole pile of them in one spot.
Same for CRHing.
The gleam of a silver reeded coin edge while detecting is a great thrill.
Same for CRhing.
You'll get your hands dirty while detecting.
Same for CRHing.
Why are people acting like these are such different activities?
We all know there's no such thing as a "hunted out" location. Let's stop using that phrase to describe a park out of which you just dug a pile of coins! Obviously that particular place wasn't "hunted out", right?
-
Dec 02, 2009, 04:29 PM
#14
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
hasnt that been an unwritten rule on here for a long time anyways? i thought we solved this problem after that guy found the gold coin in the nickel roll?
-
Dec 02, 2009, 04:53 PM
#15
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
I don't see why anyone here who posts pictures of HOARDS of keepers would have any legitimate basis to complain about the whole banner thing.
Lurkers here who see the many great finds via pictures are just as likely to get into CRHing as would somebody getting a banner spot.
For the record, I am against both banner and photos (except for pictures of rare, odd or unidentified coins). I know I am in the minority on the photo part.
Jim
-
Dec 02, 2009, 04:59 PM
#16
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by quick-silver
hasnt that been an unwritten rule on here for a long time anyways? i thought we solved this problem after that guy found the gold coin in the nickel roll?
Obviously not, as you can see from the banner right now.
What everyone seems to be forgetting here is that the Member Finds banner comes from member votes. If other T'Net members feel that a CRHing find is worthy to be on the banner, then it will end up there. These posts crying that finds from rolls don't belong on the banner are pretty darn rude if you want the truth.
If a member decides that he or she wants to share with us a find made while CRHing, and it later gets nominated for the banner, it's not the fault of the original poster. They were just excited about a find and wanted to tell others who share thier passion about it. All threads like this serve to do is drive people away from this site. Is that really what you want?
If that's your goal here, to lower the population of TreasureNet, then you could always cancel your own account. Just a suggestion....
We all know there's no such thing as a "hunted out" location. Let's stop using that phrase to describe a park out of which you just dug a pile of coins! Obviously that particular place wasn't "hunted out", right?
-
Dec 02, 2009, 05:23 PM
#17
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by af1733
 Originally Posted by quick-silver
hasnt that been an unwritten rule on here for a long time anyways? i thought we solved this problem after that guy found the gold coin in the nickel roll?
Obviously not, as you can see from the banner right now.
What everyone seems to be forgetting here is that the Member Finds banner comes from member votes. If other T'Net members feel that a CRHing find is worthy to be on the banner, then it will end up there. These posts crying that finds from rolls don't belong on the banner are pretty darn rude if you want the truth.
If a member decides that he or she wants to share with us a find made while CRHing, and it later gets nominated for the banner, it's not the fault of the original poster. They were just excited about a find and wanted to tell others who share thier passion about it. All threads like this serve to do is drive people away from this site. Is that really what you want?
If that's your goal here, to lower the population of TreasureNet, then you could always cancel your own account. Just a suggestion....
I can only speak for myself, but I don't think anyone is trying to lower the population of this website, but instead are trying to not encourage future CRHers. There is a distinction between the two.
Jim
-
Dec 02, 2009, 05:32 PM
#18
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
 Originally Posted by jim4silver
 Originally Posted by af1733
 Originally Posted by quick-silver
hasnt that been an unwritten rule on here for a long time anyways? i thought we solved this problem after that guy found the gold coin in the nickel roll?
Obviously not, as you can see from the banner right now.
What everyone seems to be forgetting here is that the Member Finds banner comes from member votes. If other T'Net members feel that a CRHing find is worthy to be on the banner, then it will end up there. These posts crying that finds from rolls don't belong on the banner are pretty darn rude if you want the truth.
If a member decides that he or she wants to share with us a find made while CRHing, and it later gets nominated for the banner, it's not the fault of the original poster. They were just excited about a find and wanted to tell others who share thier passion about it. All threads like this serve to do is drive people away from this site. Is that really what you want?
If that's your goal here, to lower the population of TreasureNet, then you could always cancel your own account. Just a suggestion....
I can only speak for myself, but I don't think anyone is trying to lower the population of this website, but instead are trying to not encourage future CRHers. There is a distinction between the two.
Jim
Exactly 100% correct Jim, thankyou.
-
Dec 02, 2009, 05:47 PM
#19
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
It's not the first time that it's happened so why does it matter? People on this website would be doing it already by just looking at this forum. Who cares. I say congrats to you for making the banner.
CRH Totals
Wheats 247
Buffalo 6
War Nic 6
Merc 0
Rosie 9
Quarter
Walking 15
Franklin 27
90% 82
40% 501
Proofs:24
Boxes searched: 193
Skunks:71
-
Dec 02, 2009, 06:17 PM
#20
 da book worm--researcher
Re: I think a new rule needs to be added to the official CRH list!!!!!
by and large those savvy enough to be scouring this web site / forum --CHR ing are already hunting --its telling locals in your area that can really kill your finds -- your bragging slits your own throat finds wize because you make your own "competitors" right where you live.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|