Incredible 1940 Nickel - is this a proof?

Coin_Surfer

Jr. Member
Aug 3, 2011
89
32
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I was looking through all of my pre 1960 nickels and I found this one. I was surprised because of the date and the condition. It almost looks uncirculated, or maybe even a proof. Please give any knowledge or advice, very much appreciated.

HH,
Coinsurfer
 

Attachments

  • 1940a1.jpg
    1940a1.jpg
    72.8 KB · Views: 649
  • 1940a2.jpg
    1940a2.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 582
Upvote 0

AGBlex

Bronze Member
Sep 20, 2011
1,286
116
southern, Maine
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Pro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
i got a 39 like that last week. i think mine is so i'm going to have to say yours is as well :icon_pirat:
 

ImpurestStewart

Hero Member
Jun 8, 2011
753
11
Laurel, Mississippi
Detector(s) used
Garrett ACE 250
Primary Interest:
Other
I don't think it's a proof, If you look at the stairs on the monticello they seem to have slight wear. You just have a really nice circulated one. I could be wrong though, I am not an expert on these things.
 

Generic_Lad

Bronze Member
Jul 23, 2010
1,373
276
Detector(s) used
Garrett Ace 250, Bounty Hunter Quick Draw
Primary Interest:
Other
I agree, just a really nice AU nickel, not a proof. Although a proof would be amazing since only 11,246 of them were minted in that year!

But still a great find :icon_thumleft:
 

jrf30

Bronze Member
May 7, 2006
1,839
299
CO, AZ
Detector(s) used
dfx, Ryedale!
A proof is not just a better example of a coin than an uncirculated one. It's not that fine is graded 40, uncirculated at 60 and proof at 70. Doesn't work that way. A proof is different from the start. Nowadays it is easy to see them, as they have frosted areas. Older ones didn't, but the mirrorlike finish is still the telling sign. This has a sharp luster to it, but not a mirror finish. Therefore, iti s an uncirculated (Or maybe even almost uncirculated) coin, but not a proof. they are born as proofs, and remain so, even when impaired. Or they are not born as proofs. this one was, in my opinion, not born a proof.
 

Th3Offspring

Sr. Member
Aug 29, 2010
250
2
Detector(s) used
Garrett Master Hunter CX Plus
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
just found one in similar if not better condition on thursday. I don't think they are proof, just a coin someone tucked away shortly after it was minted and it just now got released into my collection :laughing7:
 

canaboy123

Sr. Member
Sep 22, 2011
286
62
N/A
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Dont take my word for it but i think proof sets started being made in 1948?? :dontknow:
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Top