Wheat War # 54 Dad vs Tanner with pics (rare John Wilkes Both Commerative)

[gordon and tanner]

It has been a few weeks since we last posted. We have still been hunting. Tanner came out ahead in this battle finding 11 wheats (oldest 1929) 1 King George VI 1949 and two dimes. Dad only scored 9 common Wheats, but he did manage to score a King George V (our 5th and is a second 1933) He also managed 3 King George VI (oldest 1950) 1 dime and rare 1968d Commemorative John Wilkes Booth cent with bullet hole.

Keep on Searching
Dad and Tanner

PS silver has been kind of slow

[Ads]

TreasureNet.com is the premier Treasure Hunting Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!

[lostcauses]

fun finds, thanks for sharing.

[That Canadian Guy]

That looks like a nice 1933 you guys found. What does old George look like on the other side?

[gordon and tanner]

[QUOTE. What does old George look like on the other side?[/QUOTE]

It is all scratched up.

Dad and Tanner

[sagittarius98]

[QUOTE. What does old George look like on the other side?

It is all scratched up.

Dad and Tanner[/QUOTE]

Is it to the level of the KGVI penny with the face scratched up? Also, is the penny a real commem, or just happened to have a hole in it?

[gordon and tanner]

[QUOTE. What does old George look like on the other side?

It is all scratched up.

Dad and Tanner

Is it to the level of the KGVI penny with the face scratched up. Also, is the penny a real commem, or just happened to have a hole in it.[/QUOTE]

The 1933 King George V is in good condition. The ? King George VI is the one that is all scratched up.
Dad and Tanner

[sagittarius98]

[QUOTE. What does old George look like on the other side?

It is all scratched up.

Dad and Tanner

Is it to the level of the KGVI penny with the face scratched up. Also, is the penny a real commem, or just happened to have a hole in it.

The 1933 King George V is in good condition. The ? King George VI is the one that is all scratched up.
Dad and Tanner[/QUOTE]

Ok, thank you. However, you didn't answer my second question.