What method of pinpointing works best for you?

[Tim Williams]

What method do you like best? I use the 4-direction to box in the object for field work. I read once where someone posted on the golden cross method. I don't remember what it was about. If you know something about it please post. I know each will be different because of the place searching; caves, homes and so on.

Tim

[fernando]

Hi Tim,

Working to finish my report on RT Examiner and so far the box method is indeed what appears to be the best method I found with it. You actually reduce the searched area to the point where only a circle is left. Then you proceed direct over the target.
Regards.

[Tim Williams]

I think most people use this method. What have you noticed about the ring size in relation to the target size/mass if any?

Tim

[gldhntr]

depends on the material buried it seems...possibly in regards to the amount of leaching into the soil the target does....at least thats my theory.......gldhntr

[fernando]

I think most people use this method. What have you noticed about the ring size in relation to the target size/mass if any?

There's a procedure of pressing certain keys on the calculator to avoid ringings. In a simulated situation done according to the manual apparently it worked, but as I only got the RT recently and I'm still performing tests, I can't tell if it works in the field yet.

[Tim Williams]

That's intresting fernando, but I use rings to lead me to the target location.

Tim

[fernando]

That's intresting fernando, but I use rings to lead me to the target location.

Interesting...
Doesn't rings give false indications where the center of target is?
Using the examiner with the ring off procedure gives a clear center indication.

[Tim Williams]

Thats true, but first you have to know which area is producing the rings. False targets also produce secondary rings off the primary ring from the target.

But I believe mental dowsers do not have the problem of rings.

Tim