DEA to legalize marijuana only for ‘Big Pharma’

The Beep Goes On

Silver Member
Jan 11, 2006
3,403
207
Houston, TX
Detector(s) used
CTX3030, Excalibur II, V3i, TRX
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Typical... $$$

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/23/dea-to-legalize-marijuana-only-for-big-pharma-group-claims/

DEA to legalize marijuana only for ‘Big Pharma,’ NORML claims
By Eric W. Dolan
Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011 -- 8:33 pm


A Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) proposal to reclassify the main psychoactive chemical in marijuana as a Schedule III substance would allow pharmaceutical companies to market the drug while still penalizing common recreational use, according to marijuana law reform advocates.

The main psychoactive chemical in marijuana, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), is currently a Schedule I substance within the US Controlled Substances Act, the most restrictive schedule with the greatest criminal penalties.

In November 2010, the DEA proposed reclassifying dronabinol, a synthetic THC, as a Schedule III substance, which would place it among substances such as hydrocodone and allow it to be dispensed with a written or oral prescription.

"The DEA's intent is to expand the federal government's schedule III listing to include pharmaceutical products containing naturally derived formations of THC while simultaneously maintain existing criminal prohibitions on the plant itself," Paul Armentano, the deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), wrote at AlterNet.

With its proposal, the DEA is responding to the demands of large pharmaceutical companies, he claimed.

Marijuana plants and THC extracts would remain illegal under the proposal, but companies would be able to purchase THC from a government-licensed provider to develop pharmaceutical products.

"While the DEA's forthcoming regulatory change promises to stimulate the advent of legally available, natural THC therapeutic products... the change will offer no legal relief for those hundreds of thousands of Americans who believe that therapeutic relief is best obtained by use of the whole plant itself," Armentano added.

"Rather the DEA appears content to try to walk a political and semantic tightrope that alleges: 'pot is bad,' but 'pot-derived pharmaceuticals are good.'"

THC can help cancer patients regain their appetites and sense of taste, according to a study published on Wednesday.

"This is the first randomized controlled trial to show that THC makes food taste better and improves appetites for patients with advanced cancer, as well as helping them to sleep and to relax better," Dr. Wendy Wismer, associate professor at the University of Alberta, said. "Our findings are important, as there is no accepted treatment for chemosensory alterations experienced by cancer patients."

Fifteen states and the District of Columbia have passed legislation to legalize the medical use of marijuana.
 

mlayers

Gold Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,576
429
Northern, OH
Detector(s) used
DFX, White PI, Bounty Hunter, Whites Surfmaster II and Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Well the way I look at it. It is ok to drink they sale alcohol you must be 21 to buy it. So why not sell marijuana. All the states is complaining about losing money every year. They can sale it and tax it like cigarettes and alcohol.

I have been around drinking and smoking nearly all my life. When I have been around drinking people gets loud. When I have been around people that smoke they relax and eat. So yes it would help people with cancer to gain their appetites. So I really do not see anything wrong about this......Matt
 

oldgoat

Hero Member
Oct 21, 2008
538
9
It never fails, the government couldn't stop the sale of alcohol during Prohibition, unless it was for medicinal use so they re-legalized it and taxed it. They have failed to show any drawbacks or major safety issues for marijuana and definately have failed to stop the sale of same....Give it to the big pharmas and penalize the common user....if they were as smart as they think they are it would have legalized a long time ago and taxed.....might not have as big a deficit as they do now....just saying....goat
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top