Very weird post by Anonymous

[Jeffro]

[Jeep]

Nothing weird about this except for the voices for effect.

They are trying to reach people that seem to ignore what is going on in this administration.

This bill will turn us into prisoners without rights to trial and indefinite confinement.

I won't link to some conspiracy site but how about a respected source like Forbe's:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...mericans-face/

[Red James cash]

Obuma is said to be going to veto the bill BUT, his reason for the veto is because the detainees would then fall under the protection of the geneva conventions rules of war and treatment of prisoners.

[Chadeaux]

The goobers are nothing more than a dog and pony show. Does anyone believe that there is actually any "governing" going on in DC? It is simply the dismantling --- for whatever reason --- our laws, our constitution and the destruction of our society.

Who is at fault? The folks who let it happen --- US.

Why do you thing George Washington said that political parties would be destructive to this union?

Can anyone see what is occurring? There is no real difference between the parties. They have divided the people to conquer them and force them into submission. Who is them? US.

Every time a true conservative comes along, they are destroyed so that those who pay attention will hold their noses and vote for the "lesser of two evils".

The end of this society is near. Predicted over 2,600 years ago in a dream. Referred to about 1,980 years ago by a very different man.

We are seeing the fruits of human foolishness. "If the blind lead the blind, they will both fall into the pit".

A few people see it. Some of them are scared to death because of what they see, while the others rejoice because of a promise that was also made.

Which one are you? Blissfully ignorant, scared to death, or ready?

[Jeep]

The goobers are nothing more than a dog and pony show. Does anyone believe that there is actually any "governing" going on in DC? It is simply the dismantling --- for whatever reason --- our laws, our constitution and the destruction of our society.

Who is at fault? The folks who let it happen --- US.

Why do you thing George Washington said that political parties would be destructive to this union?

Can anyone see what is occurring? There is no real difference between the parties. They have divided the people to conquer them and force them into submission. Who is them? US.

Every time a true conservative comes along, they are destroyed so that those who pay attention will hold their noses and vote for the "lesser of two evils".

The end of this society is near. Predicted over 2,600 years ago in a dream. Referred to about 1,980 years ago by a very different man.

We are seeing the fruits of human foolishness. "If the blind lead the blind, they will both fall into the pit".

A few people see it. Some of them are scared to death because of what they see, while the others rejoice because of a promise that was also made.

Which one are you? Blissfully --deleted--, scared to death, or ready?

Good post

In reply to your question: Ready

[The Beep Goes On]

I am for any and all things bringing attention to what is happening. There are bits of truth everywhere, but, in this case, we're wallowing in the repulsively obvious. The thing is, unless we get out from behind these monitors at some point, the streets will remain empty, just like they like 'em. I think the frogs are about done...

[Chadeaux]

Which one are you? Blissfully --deleted--, scared to death, or ready?

The word "igno rant" is banned here

O.K. Political Correctness has killed the brains of whoever has their finger on the "banned words" file.

I guess if I said you looked "cute" I could get banned like the grade school kid suspended because he said his teacher was cute. They called it "sexual harassment".

Pitiful state of affairs when you can't use a legitimate descriptive word for the folks who can't tell the difference between shinola and the other stuff.

[m14nm]

Which one are you? Blissfully --deleted--, scared to death, or ready?

The word "igno rant" is banned here

O.K. Political Correctness has killed the brains of whoever has their finger on the "banned words" file.

I guess if I said you looked "cute" I could get banned like the grade school kid suspended because he said his teacher was cute. They called it "sexual harassment".

Pitiful state of affairs when you can't use a legitimate descriptive word for the folks who can't tell the difference between shinola and the other stuff.

Political correctness = A cowards way around the truth.

[cw0909]

i have not read the whole bill,but it seems the united states senate,could be detained under
bill S.1867,and questioned why they would want to,or did pass a bill,that would enable the
united states military such authority,as it seems to read as an act of terrorism,on the
united states of america

a list of possibly the first detainees under the bill S.1867
http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm

Bill Text Versions
112th Congress (2011-2012)
S.1867

There are 2 versions of Bill Number S.1867 for the 112th Congress. Usually, the last item is the most recent

1 . National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Placed on Calendar Senate - PCS)[S.1867.PCS][PDF]
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...12s1867pcs.pdf

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Engrossed in Senate [Passed Senate] - ES)[S.1867.ES][PDF]
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...112s1867es.pdf

source
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:

stay informed
www.senate.gov
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/leg...ative_home.htm
THOMAS
In the spirit of Thomas Jefferson, legislative information from the Library of Congress
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.php

posted with the authority of the united states constitution,IE:bill of rights,
granted to every united states citizen

[Chadeaux]

What some MILITARY PERSONNEL may find interesting is section 521 which repeals Section 436 of title 37 of the United States Code.

You can see what is to be repealed by going here: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/37/7/436

Hmm... rather nice of them, dontcha think?

[Red James cash]

This section was repealed when bill S1867 was voted approved

(CNSNews.com) – (Updated) The Senate on Thursday evening voted 93-7 to approve a defense authorization bill that includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, it also repeals the military ban on sex with animals--or bestiality.

On Nov. 15, the Senate Armed Services Committee had unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Article 125 of the UCMJ makes it illegal to engage in both sodomy with humans and sex with animals.

It states: "(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense. (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said the effort to remove sodomy from military law stems from liberal Senate Democrats' and President Obama’s support for removing the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy.

“It’s all about using the military to advance this administration’s radical social agenda,” Perkins told CNSNews.com. “Not only did they overturn Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, but they had another problem, and that is, under military law sodomy is illegal, just as adultery is illegal, so they had to remove that prohibition against sodomy.”

Perkins said removing the bestiality provision may have been intentional--or just “collateral damage”

“Well, whether it was inadvertent or not, they have also taken out the provision against bestiality,” he said. “So now, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), there’s nothing there to prosecute bestiality."

Former Army Col. Bob Maginnis said some military lawyers have indicated that bestiality may be prosecutable under another section of the military code of justice – the “catch-all” Article 134 for offenses against “good military order and discipline.”

But don't count on that, he said.

“If we have a soldier who engages in sodomy with an animal – whether a government animal or a non-government animal – is it, in fact, a chargeable offense under the Uniform Code? I think that’s in question,” Maginnis told CNSNews.com.

“When the reader stops laughing, the reader needs to ask the question whether or not this is in the best interests of the government, in the best interests of the military and the best interests of the country? I think not.”

He added: “Soldiers, unfortunately, like it or not, have engaged in this type of behavior in the past. Will they in the future, if they remove this statute? I don’t know.”

Perkins said there was no attempt to remove the UCMJ repeal provision from the bill, which Perkins had expected the Senate to approve.

Now that it has passed, however, the Senate version will have to go to a conference committee, and Perkins predicts there will be several sticking points with the House.

“The House in their version of the defense authorization, reinforced the Defense of Marriage Act, saying that there is a military DOMA as well, prohibiting same-sex marriage on military bases – something the Department of Defense is pushing for,” he said.

“And now this is an added concern, that sodomy has been removed, and as we have discovered, that bestiality--the prohibition against it--has been removed from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So yes, the House will have problems with this bill.”

[Chadeaux]

I guess we can learn a lot from the Muslim armies