Warning to dog owners who hike in the woods

releventchair

Gold Member
May 9, 2012
22,390
70,693
Primary Interest:
Other
Wow Tom, that's amazing. So glad it ended relatively better than it could have. I have to remark that all who have replied are seemingly so casual about this. What the H are they trapping? No, that's a stupid question, as I am aware of what critters wander in the north woods. Why are they still trapping? Are skins still that valuable? Real curious what financial gains justify this in populated areas.

Having trapped in my youth , there was money in it. More than today for sure. A look at former greatest markets and politics will explain much of the supplies stagnation in places.

That said. When prices dropped and stayed depressed ,the number of trappers declined. Followed quickly by a rise in multiple species of fur bearers.
Your area may well differ but the combination of cleaner farming practices ( eliminating fence/ hedge rows and more efficient harvests) combined with the rise of predators the pheasant population plummeted. As a trapper finding the kill sites in pheasant habitat ( hens caught on nests at night) and the nests missing their egg clutches ,it was no surprise when pheasants became a rare sight.

Raccoons,possum and other critters delight in egg eating( waterfowl not excluded) Nature has her ways and when prey is severely reduced ,predators bear less young .A delay between them ,but like water ,the relationship seeks it' s own level..Usually.
Adaptability matters greatly. Coyote will eat things like cow poop if they must. Little they will not eat.
When rabbits decline ,fox decline when coyotes over lap fox territories ,what happens to the fox is not pleasant when caught.
With coyotes on the rise nationwide more than fox suffer. Predation on deer fawns can be considerable.

We ( humans) affect the evolution of a species wane or decline ,usually for our preference.
Seeking a conservation type management on a holistic level means greater control of the more adaptable predators to enhance greater recruitment ( survival beyond birth for a while) of other species. That does not mean extermination of a species. Even though there were near extermination goals past with coyotes . It only proved their adaptability
A specie well adapted to conflict with humans and others....( entire hound packs dead in minutes, and multiple hunters losing a brace or other number of hounds while hunting.) At least until wolves arrive in their territories where the coyotes face what the fox before them did.

When numbers of a fur bearer are high there is a reason. Fur prices today do not make a trap line worth it to me from,a money perspective . Gas alone would be hard to replace.
Should the trapper on my land remove coyotes , I' ll probably cache a coffee can he can spot with cash to offset his costs.
 

Last edited:

Jim in Idaho

Silver Member
Jul 21, 2012
3,320
4,698
Blackfoot, Idaho
Detector(s) used
White's GM2, GM3, DFX, Coinmaster, TDI-SL, GM24K, Falcon MD20, old Garrett Masterhunter BFO
'Way Too Cool' dual 18 Watt UV light
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Yeah Jim, you speak the truth. Not quite so cranky this morning. It's today's reality. And I envy your living in the great state of Idaho. I lived there a total of 7 years, in both Sandpoint, and the Moscow area. I loved the opportunity to go an hour or less in any direction and be out there. REALLY miss trout fishing the streams. If wanted to work at it, I could scramble down into a canyon, and have the entire river to myself. Great time.

Yup, Kray, Idaho's a great place to live, and I've been privileged to live here for 42 years. I spent a few years around Pullman, so know the Moscow area well. Now I live in the cold corner of the state...got down to 4.1 last night, and it's only about 15 right now, though the great country here makes the cold winters worth putting up with.
Jim
 

Kray Gelder

Gold Member
Feb 24, 2017
7,013
12,578
Georgetown, SC
Detector(s) used
Fisher F75
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Coy5.JPG Coy6.JPG
Having trapped in my youth , there was money in it. More than today for sure. A look at former greatest markets and politics will explain much of the supplies stagnation in places.

That said. When prices dropped and stayed depressed ,the number of trappers declined. Followed quickly by a rise in multiple species of fur bearers.
Your area may well differ but the combination of cleaner farming practices ( eliminating fence/ hedge rows and more efficient harvests) combined with the rise of predators the pheasant population plummeted. As a trapper finding the kill sites in pheasant habitat ( hens caught on nests at night) and the nests missing their egg clutches ,it was no surprise when pheasants became a rare sight.

Raccoons,possum and other critters delight in egg eating( waterfowl not excluded) Nature has her ways and when prey is severely reduced ,predators bear less young .A delay between them ,but like water ,the relationship seeks it' s own level..Usually.
Adaptability matters greatly. Coyote will eat things like cow poop if they must. Little they will not eat.
When rabbits decline ,fox decline when coyotes over lap fox territories ,what happens to the fox is not pleasant when caught.
With coyotes on the rise nationwide more than fox suffer. Predation on deer fawns can be considerable.

We ( humans) affect the evolution of a species wane or decline ,usually for our preference.
Seeking a conservation type management on a holistic level means greater control of the more adaptable predators to enhance greater recruitment ( survival beyond birth for a while) of other species. That does not mean extermination of a species. Even though there were near extermination goals past with coyotes . It only proved their adaptability
A specie well adapted to conflict with humans and others....( entire hound packs dead in minutes, and multiple hunters losing a brace or other number of hounds while hunting.) At least until wolves arrive in their territories where the coyotes face what the fox before them did.

When numbers of a fur bearer are high there is a reason. Fur prices today do not make a trap line worth it to me from,a money perspective . Gas alone would be hard to replace.
Should the trapper on my land remove coyotes , I' ll probably cache a coffee can he can spot with cash to offset his costs.

Relevantchair, I'd like to thank you for that excellent treatise, the causes and effects of disrupting the web of life in the natural world. It ripples throughout the entire system. We here in SC also have an exploding coyote population, and they're moving right into the suburbs. If the state would allow spotlighting for coyotes from vehicles in certain areas, we could put a temporary dent in their population, but they would catch on to that tactic soon enough. It's interesting to note the positive impact on the natural environment and species in Yellowstone since the reintroduction of wolves. When I had that brief job ( 2 years ) of patrolling That Army Corps of Engineers dam and canal project, I purchased my own set of magnetic mount halogen flood lights ( 4 lights ) and mounted them on the roof each night. Before that, I couldn't see a thing. There were coyotes everywhere!

Coy1.JPG Coy2.JPG Coy3.JPG Coy4.JPG
 

Last edited:

Kray Gelder

Gold Member
Feb 24, 2017
7,013
12,578
Georgetown, SC
Detector(s) used
Fisher F75
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Yup, Kray, Idaho's a great place to live, and I've been privileged to live here for 42 years. I spent a few years around Pullman, so know the Moscow area well. Now I live in the cold corner of the state...got down to 4.1 last night, and it's only about 15 right now, though the great country here makes the cold winters worth putting up with.
Jim

Yeah, those cold winters are the price paid, for the rewards of the rest of the year.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Top