English Sterling Condiment(?) Thing

trdhrdr007

Bronze Member
Nov 1, 2009
1,427
1,332
Picked this up about an hour ago. Haven't looked up the hallmarks yet. Going from memory I'm thinking sterling & London. Maker's initials are LS. This came from a "professionally" run sale that had everything marked sterling priced at 4-6 times melt. This wasn't priced. The lady running it knows I buy sterling & asked if that's what this was. I'm not in the habit of telling lies but I'm also not going to do her job for her. I ended up telling her they were hallmarked but I'd have to test them to know for sure. She priced it slightly under melt. Unfortunately I didn't get any spoons with it. Obviously some sort of salt/condiment. Anyone have any idea what to call it?
 

Attachments

  • 005.JPG
    005.JPG
    54.3 KB · Views: 88
  • 006.JPG
    006.JPG
    57.4 KB · Views: 95
  • 003.JPG
    003.JPG
    59 KB · Views: 111
  • 002.JPG
    002.JPG
    41.8 KB · Views: 118

jason4kstate

Full Member
Jun 23, 2007
210
245
Wow what a score! Looks like L Spiers with a 1867 hallmark, Birmingham mint. Top right looks like a mustard pot, the bottom is a salt cellar, the top might be for relish, and the top left looks like its for pepper but that's just a guess. Not having the spoons is not that big of a deal.
 

MUD(S.W.A.T)

Gold Member
Apr 15, 2005
8,003
897
Location: Undisclosed
Detector(s) used
I use, Whites MXT and Garrett AT Pro.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Really nice find, I'm sure in that condition worth more than melt. :notworthy:

Keep @ It and HH ! :hello2:
 

Rodbuster209

Hero Member
Oct 26, 2010
832
622
Northern California
Detector(s) used
MineLab SE, Excaliber 1000, Sovereign, White's SpectrumXLT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Great finds! You can't wrong with PM's if the price is right!
 

Red-Coat

Gold Member
Dec 23, 2019
5,241
16,436
Surrey, UK
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Just doing a bit of tidying up on some older threads, mainly for the benefit of anyone searching the site for information.

The 1867 Birmingham Assay Office (not ‘Mint’) mark would be a letter ‘S’ but I see a gothic lower case ‘m’, which is for 1886. A gothic lower case ‘m’ would be 1867 for London, but they didn’t use the same sequence as Birmingham. L, Spiers is correct as the maker. I would expect it to do better than melt, too.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top