norbyx
Hero Member
- Jun 3, 2012
- 837
- 163
- Detector(s) used
-
Actual: Whites MXT All Pro, M6 and Tesoro Sand Shark
Ex: BH Platinum, Tesoro Lobo, ST & Tejon, Teknetics Delta, Whites MXT, V3i, Dual Field, MX5; DP Wader, Garrett At-PRO, Fisher Gold Bug 2, CZ-70Pro
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Now it's time for the Garrett At-Pro to proof itself
Well I have had several detectors in the past year, and I finally decided to test the At-Pro. It's a more of a forced test than a wanted one but I am happy.
I had to sell my Whites V3i since I wasn't using it as much as I liked. One of the reasons for this might have also been that I was tired of having a detector that I was never sure 100% if I was in the correct setting. Don't get me wrong I think that it was a superb detector, but maybe it wasn't for me.
The other detector I loved was the Whites MXT (Yes I was a whites fan), and that one I liked a lot due to the fact that it was very simple to use and the settings were not all that complicated.
Now I just traded my last whites detector for a Garrett AT-Pro. The main reason of changing of brand was that after talking to a friend and reading a lot of posts on the web, I think that the AT-Pro might be one of the Top detectors on the market right now.
I don't know if it's fair to compair it to other detectors that cost 2 or 3 times as much but aparently does compare and it can keep up with the top of line detectors on the market, yet keeping a simple to use system.
Anyway, I have read most of the posts online on this detector and I don't know if I am missing anything on it, but I don't think so.
What I would like to know is if there is anyone that has had a whites MXT or the V series and has compared it to the Garrett.
I hope I made the right choice in getting the Garrett, and any particular suggestions are all welcome.
I live in Costa Rica, so mainly very mineralized soils arround here.
Well I have had several detectors in the past year, and I finally decided to test the At-Pro. It's a more of a forced test than a wanted one but I am happy.
I had to sell my Whites V3i since I wasn't using it as much as I liked. One of the reasons for this might have also been that I was tired of having a detector that I was never sure 100% if I was in the correct setting. Don't get me wrong I think that it was a superb detector, but maybe it wasn't for me.
The other detector I loved was the Whites MXT (Yes I was a whites fan), and that one I liked a lot due to the fact that it was very simple to use and the settings were not all that complicated.
Now I just traded my last whites detector for a Garrett AT-Pro. The main reason of changing of brand was that after talking to a friend and reading a lot of posts on the web, I think that the AT-Pro might be one of the Top detectors on the market right now.
I don't know if it's fair to compair it to other detectors that cost 2 or 3 times as much but aparently does compare and it can keep up with the top of line detectors on the market, yet keeping a simple to use system.
Anyway, I have read most of the posts online on this detector and I don't know if I am missing anything on it, but I don't think so.
What I would like to know is if there is anyone that has had a whites MXT or the V series and has compared it to the Garrett.
I hope I made the right choice in getting the Garrett, and any particular suggestions are all welcome.
I live in Costa Rica, so mainly very mineralized soils arround here.
