coastaljoe
Tenderfoot
Does anyone know what the law is regarding detecting in Savannah on private property if you have permission?
With permission. Written to save your xxx.Tom_in_CA said:Joe, there is no restriction in ANY state, that forbids metal detecting (yup, even finding old targets) on private land, with permission.
There might have been some rumors of proposed laws in some states, but they have never passed a vote.
There was some flap in Oregon, that ........ in fact .... preservation/heritage/antiquities laws could be extended down to the private land level, but nothing has ever become of it. That bruhaha started with someone showing their antique bottle collection publicly, that had been dug over the years from private privys behind old houses. Some archie seeing the display, and hearing the bottle-digger tell of his collection, raised a stink. Supposedly he was relying on some far-reaching semantics, that even down to private land level, an "archaeological site" had been disturbed. But this was all nonsense and rubbish. The private site would have to have been declared "archaeologically significant", to begin with, to have even been in that class (or as they say in England, a "scheduled" site). To which the purist archies and bottle digger could go back and forth with semantics till the cows come home.
But back to your question: You can detect private property, in any state, with permission, till you're blue in the face.
coastaljoe said:Thanks for everyones help. Just being on the safe side before I start
4-H said:With permission.Tom_in_CA said:Joe, there is no restriction in ANY state, that forbids metal detecting (yup, even finding old targets) on private land, with permission.
There might have been some rumors of proposed laws in some states, but they have never passed a vote.
There was some flap in Oregon, that ........ in fact .... preservation/heritage/antiquities laws could be extended down to the private land level, but nothing has ever become of it. That bruhaha started with someone showing their antique bottle collection publicly, that had been dug over the years from private privys behind old houses. Some archie seeing the display, and hearing the bottle-digger tell of his collection, raised a stink. Supposedly he was relying on some far-reaching semantics, that even down to private land level, an "archaeological site" had been disturbed. But this was all nonsense and rubbish. The private site would have to have been declared "archaeologically significant", to begin with, to have even been in that class (or as they say in England, a "scheduled" site). To which the purist archies and bottle digger could go back and forth with semantics till the cows come home.
But back to your question: You can detect private property, in any state, with permission, till you're blue in the face.