Ever Wonder Who Moniters Detecting Forums

[limegoldconvertible68]

I realize I probably just need to go on anti-paranoid meds but do you ever worry that instead of just a bunch of detectorists chatting about their favorite hobby there are others reading these posts with more sinister ideas. Maybe crooks trying to figure out whose homes to break into. Maybe the IRS or state revenue officers trying to figure out who to audit.

[Jason in Enid]

Put down the pipe, it will be ok.

Who is monitoring these sites? Your competition looking for a proven place to go hunt. Archies looking for the next big dig site that they can publish an article about.

[bigscoop]

I realize I probably just need to go on anti-paranoid meds but do you ever worry that instead of just a bunch of detectorists chatting about their favorite hobby there are others reading these posts with more sinister ideas. Maybe crooks trying to figure out whose homes to break into. Maybe the IRS or state revenue officers trying to figure out who to audit.

I hope they are! Sure bet my home will be safe and the IRS will leave me alone.

[Treasure_Hunter]

This topic has been discussed more than a few times over the 6.5 years I have been here.
For those listening....."I never find anything of value, I never sell anything, I never make a profit off of anything, I have nothing of value"..........Well except my S&W 9MM that I keep loaded for home protection.....

[aa battery]

This topic has been discussed more than a few times over the 6.5 years I have been here.
For those listening....."I never find anything of value, I never sell anything, I never make a profit off of anything, I have nothing of value"..........Well except my S&W 9MM that I keep loaded for home protection.....

just yesterday when i posted homeland security here it took time to load

[bigscoop]

Oh, and I need to add........."I TOOK A HUGE LOSS TREASURE HUNTING AGAIN THIS YEAR!"

[aa battery]

i got nothin

[poorhunter78]

Oh, and I need to add........."I TOOK A HUGE LOSS TREASURE HUNTING AGAIN THIS YEAR!"

DITTO!!!! Let them come Audit me, Well the nothin I have plus the nothing they take leaves me where I started.. With Nothing..

[spartacus53]

Or, yu can be more like me..

I have no problem bragging in any great find; heck, for that matter I'll even toss in the pictures for good measure.. Bottom line, no one would believe me anyway

[thrillathahunt]

Oh, and I need to add........."I TOOK A HUGE LOSS TREASURE HUNTING AGAIN THIS YEAR!"

DITTO!!!! Let them come Audit me, Well the nothin I have plus the nothing they take leaves me where I started.. With Nothing..

Nothin from Nothin leaves Nothin.....sounds like an old Billy Preston song.

[BosnMate]

I got a bunch of rusty nails and pull tabs. Are they worth anything? Do you suppose the IRS wants me to declare 2 lbs of pull tabs. Is so, I'm prolly a felon, because I've never declared them, but if they want, I can show 'em.

[Terry Soloman]

Ahh man! Now I have millions of dollars of stuff in my house that I found walking behind E Tracs, and you're telling me my Ex wives know about it now?

[RGINN]

Certain finds I never post, for reasons of my own. But I will fess up to the IRS. I have the largest collection of square nails in existence. Presently, I am storing them at the locations they were found. Old miner's cabins, mine sites, and ghost towns across central Colorado Rockies. I just left them there, but they're mine. My holdings make me worth perhaps 4, 5 dollars in unreported income.

[Red James cash]

Ever Wonder Who Moniters Detecting Forums

Where would you like me to start ?

[Red James cash]

DHS Creates Accounts Solely to Monitor Social Networks

By OLIVIA KATRANDJIAN
Dec. 28, 2011

An online privacy group is suing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security accusing it of not releasing records from the agency's covert surveillance of Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites.

The DHS creates accounts solely to monitor social media sites and establish a system of records of the information gathered. The agency does not post information, seek to connect with other users, accept invitations to connect or interact with others according to a statement on their website.

The agency scans social media sites for a list of words that include "dirty bomb," "hostage," "exercise," "task force," "explosion," "lockdown," "riot," "nuclear threat," "brown out," "meth lab," "cain and abel" and "brute forcing."

Several countries and cities, including North Korea and Mexico, are also flagged as key words.

In a statement, the DHS said that the National Operations Center (NOC) "will gather, store, analyze, and disseminate relevant and appropriate de-identified information to federal, state, local, and foreign governments, and private sector partners authorized to receive situational awareness and a common operating picture," said the statement.

In April 2011, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) requested records from the DHS of the agency's social network monitoring program. The agency has an obligation to locate the records and notify the requestor if the records are available for release.

Marc Rotenberg, EPIC's executive director, told ABC News that the requests have gone unanswered.

On Dec. 20, EPIC filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the DHS.

"We want to know how they're collecting information online, what they're collecting online and if there's legal basis to do this," Rotenberg told ABC News.

"We are trying to understand what the circumstances are when the DHS is engaged in tracking to social media sites," Rotenberg added.

The DHS declined to comment on the issue.

Former FBI agent and ABC News consultant Brad Garrett said this initiative is nothing new.

"One of the biggest overlooked areas of the federal government when it comes to crime and terrorism is diligently searching public source information," said Garrett.

Garrett said the DHS can see online information that's not available to the public as long as they have legal authority, in the form of a search warrant, to do so. But often people leave private information open to the public.

"People today are very open about their thoughts and feelings on a number of different topics. It amazes me the amount of information people will write about themselves online. There's a false security about the anonymity of sitting in front of a computer screen and saying things you wouldn't say in public or in front of your parents or your spouse," said Garrett.

Garrett said the DHS should be monitoring social media sites.

"It's one of those things that the government should be doing as long as they're obeying the law. I can't tell you how many bad guys have been caught because they do something bad and then post about it online," Garrett said.

[Red James cash]

Publicly Available Social Media Monitoring and Situational Awareness Initiative of 2010 FULL TEXT

Privacy Impact Assessment

for the

Publicly Available Social Media Monitoring

and

Situational Awareness Initiative

June 22, 2010

Office of Operations Coordination and Planning

Director (Acting),NationalOperationsCenter

Department of Homeland Security

(official pdf)

Abstract

The Office of Operations Coordination and Planning (OPS), National Operations Center (NOC), will launch and lead the Publicly Available Social Media Monitoring and Situational Awareness (Initiative) to assist the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its components involved in fulfilling OPS statutory responsibility (Section 515 of the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. § 321d(b)(1)) to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture for the federal government, and for those state, local, and tribal governments, as appropriate. The NOC and participating components1 may also share this de-identified information with international partners and the private sector where necessary and appropriate for coordination. While this Initiative is not designed to actively collect Personally Identifiable Information (PII), OPS is conducting this Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) because the Initiative could potentially involve PII or other information received in an identifiable form. In the event PII comes into the Department’s possession under this Initiative, the NOC will redact all PII prior to further dissemination of any collected information. In the event of an in extremis situation involving potential life and death, OPS will share certain PII with the responding authority in order for them to take the necessary actions to save a life, such as name and location of a person calling for help buried under rubble, or hiding in a hotel room when the hotel is under attack by terrorists.

Reference is made to previous social media event monitoring initiative PIAs conducted by OPS to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture for the entire federal government, and for state, local, and tribal governments as appropriate, and to ensure that critical disaster-related information reaches government decision makers consistent with Section 515 of the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. § 321d(b)(1)). Those OPS PIAs include: 1) Haiti Social Media Disaster Monitoring Initiative (January 21, 2010); 2) 2010 Winter Olympics Social Media Event Monitoring Initiative (February 10, 2010); and 3) April 2010 BP Oil Spill Response Social Media Event Monitoring Initiative (April 29, 2010). For more information on these OPS PIAs, visit www.dhs.gov/privacy. Going forward, individual PIAs on social media monitoring will not be issued, instead, they will be covered by this overarching PIA.

This PIA will be reviewed every six months to ensure compliance. This will be done in conjunction with a Privacy Office-led Privacy Compliance Review of the Initiative and of OPS social media monitoring Internet-based platforms and information technology infrastructure.

Overview

Federal law requires the NOC to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture for the entire federal government, and for state, local, and tribal governments as appropriate, and to ensure that critical disaster-related information reaches government decision makers. See Section 515 of the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. § 321d(b)(1)). The law defines the term “situational awareness” as “information gathered from a variety of sources that, when communicated to emergency managers and decision makers, can form the basis for incident management decision-making.” OPS is launching and leading this Initiative to fulfill its legal mandate to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture. In doing so, OPS is working with select components within the Department to achieve this statutory mandate.

1 OPS is working with select components within the Department to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture for the federal government, and for state, local, and tribal governments as appropriate, and to ensure that critical disaster-related information reaches government decision makers consistent with Section 515 of the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. § 321d(b)(1)).

The NOC will use Internet-based platforms that provide a variety of ways to follow activity related to monitoring publicly available online forums, blogs, public websites, and message boards. Through the use of publicly available search engines and content aggregators2 the NOC will monitor activities on the social media sites listed in Appendix A for information that the NOC can use to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture. Appendix A is a current list of sites that the NOC will use as a starting point under this Initiative. Initial sites listed may link to other sites not listed. The NOC may also monitor those sites if they are within the scope of this Initiative. The NOC will gather, store, analyze, and disseminate relevant and appropriate de-identified information to federal, state, local, and foreign governments, and private sector partners authorized to receive situational awareness and a common operating picture. Under this initiative, OPS will not: 1) actively seek personally identifiable information (PII); 2) post any information; 3) actively seek to connect with other internal/external personal users; 4) accept other internal/external personal users’ invitations to connect; or 5) interact on social media sites. However, OPS is permitted to establish user names and passwords to form profiles and follow relevant government, media, and subject matter experts on social media sites listed in Appendix A in order to use search tools under established criteria and search terms such as those listed in Appendix B for monitoring that supports providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture.

The NOC will identify and monitor only information needed to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture. The NOC will use this information to fulfill the statutory mandate set forth above to include the sharing of information with foreign governments and the private sector as otherwise authorized by law.

The Department may use social media for other purposes including interacting with the public, disseminating information to the public, as well as law enforcement, intelligence, and other operations covered by applicable authorities and PIAs. For more information on these social media PIAs, visit www.dhs.gov/privacy.



Section 1.0 Characterization of the Information

The following questions are intended to define the scope of the information requested and/or collected as well as reasons for its collection as part of the program, system, rule, or technology being developed.

1.1 What information is collected, used, disseminated, or maintained in the system?

Third-party service providers offer an array of applications that provide social media services along with publicly-available online forums, blogs, public websites, and message boards. See Appendix A for a current list of the types of sites that may be viewed for information. See Appendix B for current search terms used under this Initiative. The NOC will review information posted by individual account users on third-party social media websites of activities and events necessary to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture. The NOC will access these web-based platforms to identify content posted by public users for the purpose of providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture.

2 Content aggregators generally provide a consolidated view of web content in a single browser display or desktop application.

The NOC will assess information identified to assist decision-makers.

The NOC shall not actively collect data on the individuals posting information to third-party service providers, about individual users, or PII. Should PII come into the NOC’s possession, the NOC shall redact it prior to further dissemination of any collected information. In the event of an in extremis situation involving potential life and death, DHS will share certain PII with the responding authority in order for them to take the necessary actions to save a life, such as name and location of a person calling for help buried under rubble, or hiding in a hotel room when the hotel is under attack by terrorists.



1.2 What are the sources of the information in the system?

Members of the public as well as first responders, press, volunteers, and others provide publicly available information on social medial sites including online forums, blogs, public websites, and message boards. OPS is permitted to establish user names and passwords to form profiles on social media sites listed in Appendix A and to use search tools under established criteria and search terms such as those listed in Appendix B for monitoring that supports providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture.



1.3 Why is the information being collected, used, disseminated, or maintained?

The NOC will identify, use, disseminate, and maintain this information to comply with its statutory mandate to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture for the entire federal government, and for state, local, and tribal governments as appropriate and to ensure that this information reaches government decision makers. The aggregation of data published via social media sites should make it possible for the NOC to provide more accurate situational awareness, a more complete common operating picture, and more timely information for decision makers.



1.4 How is the information collected?

The NOC will identify information directly from third-party social media services. The NOC will access and collect information from various informational streams and postings that the NOC, as well as the broader public, view and monitor. See Appendix A for a list of the types of sites that may be viewed for information. See Appendix B for the types of search terms used in social media monitoring.



1.5 How will the information be checked for accuracy?

The NOC will identify information from third-party social media services submitted voluntarily by members of the public and compares that information with information available in open source reporting and through a variety of public and government sources. By bringing together and comparing many different sources of information, the NOC will attempt to provide a more accurate picture of contemporaneous activities.



1.6 What specific legal authorities, arrangements, and/or agreements defined the collection of information?

Congress requires the NOC “to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture for the entire federal government and for state, local, and tribal governments as appropriate, in the event of a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other manmade disaster; and ensure that critical terrorism and disaster-related information reaches government decision-makers.” Section 515 of the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. § 321d(b)(1)). While the NOC may receive PII, PII is not actively collected and is not retrieved by personal identifier so a Privacy Act System of Records Notice is not required.



1.7 Privacy Impact Analysis: Given the amount and type of data collected, discuss the privacy risks identified and how they were mitigated.

There is a risk that the NOC will receive PII or other identifiable information that is not relevant to this Initiative. The NOC has a clear policy in place that any PII incidentally received will be redacted immediately. Also, under this initiative OPS will not: 1) actively seek PII; 2) post any information; 3) actively seek to connect with other internal/external personal users; 4) accept other internal/external personal users’ invitations to connect; and 5) interact on social media sites. Information collected to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture originates from publicly available social media sites and is available to the public.



Section 2.0 Uses of the Information

The following questions are intended to delineate clearly the use of information and the accuracy of the data being used.



2.1 Describe all the uses of information.

The NOC will use Internet-based platforms that provide a variety of ways to follow activities by monitoring publicly available online forums, blogs, public websites, and message boards. Through the use of publicly available search engines and content aggregators, the NOC will continuously monitor activities on social media sites, such as those listed in Appendix A, using search terms, such as those listed in Appendix B, for information. The NOC will gather, store, analyze, and disseminate relevant and appropriate information to federal, state, local, and foreign governments, and private sector partners requiring and authorized to receive situational awareness and a common operating picture.



2.2 What types of tools are used to analyze data and what type of data may be produced?

NOC analysts will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating information provided on social media sites and will use tools offered by third-party social media sites to aid them in this overall effort. The final analysis will be used to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture.



2.3 If the system uses commercial or publicly available data please explain why and how it is used.

Publicly available, user-generated data can be useful to decision-makers as it provides “on-the-ground” information to help corroborate information received through official sources.



2.4 Privacy Impact Analysis: Describe any types of controls that may be in place to ensure that information is handled in accordance with the above described uses.

The risk is that PII will be sent to the NOC unintentionally. This has been mitigated by the clear policy that any PII inadvertently collected shall be redacted immediately before further use and sharing. The Department is providing notice of all uses of information under this Initiative through this PIA. the NOC will not actively collect or use any PII.



Section 3.0 Retention

The following questions are intended to outline how long information will be retained after the initial collection.



3.1 What information is retained?

The NOC will retain only user-generated information posted to publicly available online social media sites. Information posted in the public sphere that the Department uses to provide situational awareness or establish a common operating picture becomes a federal record and the Department is required to maintain a copy. However, the Department is working with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) on a retention schedule to immediately delete PII, upon the approval of this schedule byNARA, as well as to maintain records necessary for further use by the Department.



3.2 How long is information retained?

The NOC will retain information only long enough to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture. Information posted in the public sphere that the Department uses to provide situational awareness or establish a common operating picture becomes a federal record and the Department is required to maintain a copy. The Department is working withNARAon a retention schedule to immediately delete PII, upon the approval of this schedule byNARA, as well as to maintain records necessary for further use by the Department.



3.3 Has the retention schedule been approved by the component records officer and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)?

The Office of Records Management is working withNARAto establish an approved retention and disposal policy.



3.4 Privacy Impact Analysis: Please discuss the risks associated with the length of time data is retained and how those risks are mitigated.

The risk associated with retention of information is that PII will be retained when it is not necessary and that the information will be kept longer than is necessary. The NOC has mitigated this risk by redacting PII it inadvertently collects and is working withNARAon a retention schedule to immediately delete PII, upon the approval of this schedule byNARA, as well as to maintain records necessary for further use by the Department.



Section 4.0 Internal Sharing and Disclosure

The following questions are intended to define the scope of sharing within the Department of Homeland Security.



4.1 With which internal organization(s) is the information shared, what information is shared and for what purpose?

Information will be shared within the NOC and with government leadership who have a need to know. The NOC is sharing this information for the statutorily mandated purpose of providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture.



4.2 How is the information transmitted or disclosed?

Information will be transmitted via email and telephone and by other electronic and paper means within the NOC and to government leadership where necessary and appropriate. PII will not actively be collected, but if pushed to the NOC, it will be redacted by the NOC before information is shared. The remaining data is analyzed and prepared for reporting.



4.3 Privacy Impact Analysis: Considering the extent of internal information sharing, discuss the privacy risks associated with the sharing and how they were mitigated.

The risk associated with sharing this information is that PII will be inadvertently collected and shared. The NOC has mitigated this risk by establishing effective policies to avoid collection of PII and to redact it if collected inadvertently. The NOC will only monitor publicly accessible sites where users post information voluntarily.



Section 5.0 External Sharing and Disclosure

The following questions are intended to define the content, scope, and authority for information sharing external to DHS which includes federal, state and local government, and the private sector.



5.1 With which external organization(s) is the information shared, what information is shared, and for what purpose?

The NOC will use this Initiative to fulfill its statutory responsibility to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture for the entire federal government, and for state, local, and tribal governments as appropriate, and to ensure that critical disaster-related information reaches government decision makers. Information may also be shared with private sector and international partners where necessary, appropriate, and authorized by law.



5.2 Is the sharing of personally identifiable information outside the Department compatible with the original collection? If so, is it covered by an appropriate routine use in a SORN? If so, please describe. If not, please describe under what legal mechanism the program or system is allowed to share the personally identifiable information outside of DHS.

PII will not actively be collected. However, if pushed to the NOC, the PII will be redacted. Information is only collected to provide situational awareness and to establish a common operating picture.



5.3 How is the information shared outside the Department and what security measures safeguard its transmission?

Information will be shared by phone, email, and other paper and electronic means.



5.4 Privacy Impact Analysis: Given the external sharing, explain the privacy risks identified and describe how they were mitigated.

External sharing risks are minimal as the Initiative will not share PII; only information collected to provide situational awareness and to establish a common operating picture is shared.



Section 6.0 Notice

The following questions are directed at notice to the individual of the scope of information collected, the right to consent to uses of said information, and the right to decline to provide information.



6.1 Was notice provided to the individual prior to collection of information?

The Department may publicize its use of social media. The NOC does not, however, provide notice to specific public users who voluntarily provide user-generated information on publicly accessible social media sites. The NOC may retrieve public information from the social media sites, but will not interact with individual personal users.



6.2 Do individuals have the opportunity and/or right to decline to provide information?

Information posted to social media websites is publicly accessible and voluntarily generated. Thus, the opportunity not to provide information exists prior to the informational post by the user.



6.3 Do individuals have the right to consent to particular uses of the information? If so, how does the individual exercise the right?

Individuals voluntarily post information on social media sites and have the ability to restrict access to their posts as they see fit. Any information posted publicly can be used by the NOC in providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture.



6.4 Privacy Impact Analysis: Describe how notice is provided to individuals, and how the risks associated with individuals being unaware of the collection are mitigated.

There is no requirement to provide notice to individuals under the framework applied under this Initiative. Information posted to social media approved for monitoring under this Initiative is publicly accessible and voluntarily generated.



Section 7.0 Access, Redress and Correction

The following questions are directed at an individual’s ability to ensure the accuracy of the information collected about them.



7.1 What are the procedures that allow individuals to gain access to their information?

Social media are public websites. All users have access to their own information through their user accounts. Individuals should consult the privacy policies of the services they subscribe to for more information.



7.2 What are the procedures for correcting inaccurate or erroneous information?

Users may accidentally or purposefully generate inaccurate or erroneous information. There is no mechanism for correcting this. However, the community is largely self-governing and erroneous information is normally expunged or debated rather quickly by others within the community with more accurate and/or truthful information.



7.3 How are individuals notified of the procedures for correcting their information?

There is no specified procedure for correcting information to DHS; if there was, it relates to a social media- provided process and not a DHS process. Individuals may change their PII on the sites as well as the accessibility of their content posts at any time they wish through their user account management tools on social media sites.



7.4 If no formal redress is provided, what alternatives are available to the individual?

There is no specified procedure for correcting information to DHS; if there was, it relates to a social media-provided process and not a DHS process. Individuals may change their PII as well as the accessibility of their content posts at any time they wish through their user account management tools on the social media sites. Individuals should consult the privacy policies of the services to which they subscribe for more information.


7.5 Privacy Impact Analysis: Please discuss the privacy risks associated with the redress available to individuals and how those risks are mitigated.

The information available on social networking websites is largely user-generated, which means that the individual chooses the amount of information available about himself/herself as well as the ease with which it can be accessed by other users. Thus, the primary account holder should be able to redress any concerns through the third-party social media service. Individuals should consult the privacy policies of the services they subscribe to for more information.



Section 8.0 Technical Access and Security

The following questions are intended to describe technical safeguards and security measures.



8.1 What procedures are in place to determine which users may access the system and are they documented?

No procedures are in place. Social media sites are publicly available, third-party services.



8.2 Will Department contractors have access to the system?

Yes, as it is required in the performance of their contractual duties at DHS.



8.3 Describe what privacy training is provided to users either generally or specifically relevant to the program or system?

All DHS employees and contractors are required to take annual privacy training.



8.4 Has Certification & Accreditation been completed for the system or systems supporting the program?

No. Social media sites are publicly available, third-party services.



8.5 What auditing measures and technical safeguards are in place to prevent misuse of data?

This PIA will be reviewed every six months to ensure compliance. This will be done in conjunction with a Privacy Office-led Privacy Compliance Review of the Initiative and of OPS social media monitoring internet based platforms and information technology infrastructure.



8.6 Privacy Impact Analysis: Given the sensitivity and scope of the information collected, as well as any information sharing conducted on the system, what privacy risks were identified and how do the security controls mitigate them?

These social media sites are publicly available, third-party services. Information is collected by the service itself to establish an account. Thereafter, users determine their level of involvement and decide how “visible” they wish their presence on any given service to be. The ability to choose how much information to disclose, as well as the short period of retention for any information collected by the NOC serves to mitigate any privacy risk.



Section 9.0 Technology

The following questions are directed at critically analyzing the selection process for any technologies utilized by the system, including system hardware, RFID, biometrics and other technology.



9.1 What type of project is the program or system?

Third-parties control and operate social media services. Users should consult with representatives of the service provider in order to make themselves aware of technologies utilized by the system.



9.2 What stage of development is the system in and what project development lifecycle was used?

Social media is active at all times and is third-party owned and operated.



9.3 Does the project employ technology which may raise privacy concerns? If so please discuss their implementation.

Individuals should consult the privacy policies of the services they subscribe to for more information.



Responsible Officials

Director (Acting),NationalOperationsCenter

Office of Operations Coordination and Planning

Department of Homeland Security



Approval Signature

Original signed and on file with the DHS Privacy Office

Chief Privacy Officer

Department of Homeland Security Privacy Impact Assessment Office of Operations

APPENDIX A

Social Media Web Sites Monitored by the NOC
This is a representative list of sites that the NOC will start to monitor in order to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture under this Initiative. Initial sites listed may link to other sites not listed. The NOC may also monitor those sites if they are within the scope of this Initiative. Tool Link User/Password Required
General Search
Collecta http://collecta.com No
RSSOwl http://www.rssowl.org/ No
Social Mention http://socialmention.com/ No
Spy http://www.spy.appspot.com No
Who’s Talkin http://www.whostalkin.com/ No
Shrook RSS reader http://www.utsire.com/shrook/ No
Video
Hulu http://www.hulu.com No
iReport.com http://www.ireport.com/ No
Live Leak http://www.liveleak.com/ No
Magma http://mag.ma/ No
Time Tube http://www.dipity.com/mashups/timetube No
Vimeo http://www.vimeo.com No
Youtube http://www.youtube.com No
MySpace Video http://vids.myspace.com/ No
Maps
Global Incident Map http://globalincidentmap.com/ No
Google Flu Trends http://www.google.org/flutrends/ No
Health Map http://www.healthmap.org/en No
IBISEYE http://www.ibiseye.com/ No
Stormpulse http://www.stormpulse.com/ No
Trends Map http://www.trendsmap.com No
Photos
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/ No
Picfog http://picfog.com/ No
Twicsy http://www.twicsy.com No
Twitcaps http://www.twitcaps.com No
Twitter/API
Twitter/API http://www.twitter.com Yes
Twitter Search
Monitter http://www.monitter.com/ No
Twazzup http://www.twazzup.com No
Tweefind http://www.tweefind.com/ No
Tweetgrid http://tweetgrid.com/ No
Tweetzi http://tweetzi.com/ No
Twitter Search http://search.twitter.com/advanced No
Twitter Trends
Newspapers on Twitter http://www.newspapersontwitter.com/ No
Radio on Twitter http://www.radioontwitter.com/ No
Trendistic http://trendistic.com/ No
Trendrr http://www.trendrr.com/ No
TV on Twitter http://www.tvontwitter.com/ No
Tweet Meme http://tweetmeme.com/ No
TweetStats http://tweetstats.com/ No
Twellow http://www.twellow.com/ No
Twendz http://twendz.waggeneredstrom.com/ No
Twitoaster http://twitoaster.com/ No
Twitscoop http://www.twitscoop.com/ No
Twitturly http://twitturly.com/ No
We Follow http://wefollow.com/ No
Facebook
It’s Trending http://www.itstrending.com/news/ No
Facebook http://www.facebook.com Yes
MySpace http://www.myspace.com Yes
MySpace (limited search) http://www.myspace.com No
Blogs Aggs
ABCNews Blotter http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/ No
al Sahwa http://al-sahwa.blogspot.com/ No
AllAfrica http://allafrica.com/ No
Avian Flu Diary http://afludiary.blogspot.com/ No
BNOnews http://www.bnonews.com/ No
Borderfire Report http://www.borderfirereport.net/ No
Borderland Beat http://www.borderlandbeat.com/ No
Brickhouse Security http://blog.brickhousesecurity.com/ No
Chem.Info http://www.chem.info/default.aspx No
LivesayHaitiBlog http://livesayhaiti.blogspot.com/ No
LongWarJournal http://www.longwarjournal.org/ No
Malware Intelligence Blog http://malwareint.blogspot.com/ No
MEMRI http://www.memri.org/ No
MexiData.info http://mexidata.info/ No
MS-13 News and Analysis http://msthirteen.com/ No
Narcotrafico enMexico http://narcotraficoenmexico.blogspot.com/ No
National Defense Magazine http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org No
National Terror Alert http://www.nationalterroralert.com/ No
NEFA Foundation http://www.nefafoundation.org/ No
Newsweek Blogs http://blog.newsweek.com/ No
Nuclear Street http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/ No
NYTimes Lede Blog http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/ No
Plowshares Fund http://www.ploughshares.org/news-analysis/blog No
Popular Science Blogs http://www.popsci.com/ No
Port Strategy http://www.portstrategy.com/ No
Public Intelligence http://publicintelligence.net/ No
ReliefWeb http://www.reliefweb.int No
RigZone http://www.rigzone.com/ No
Science Daily http://www.sciencedaily.com/ No
STRATFOR http://www.stratfor.com/ No
Technorati http://technorati.com/ No
Terror Finance Blog http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_blog/ No
The Latin Americanist http://ourlatinamerica.blogspot.com/ No
Threat Level http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/ No
Threat Matrix http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix/ No
Tickle the Wire http://www.ticklethewire.com/ No
Tribuna Regional http://latribunaregional.blogspot.com/ No
TruckingInfo.com http://www.truckinginfo.com/news/index.asp No
United Nations IRIN http://www.irinnews.org/ No
UshahidiHaiti http://haiti.ushahidi.org/ No
War on Terrorism http://terrorism-online.blogspot.com/ No
WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/ No
WireUpdate http://wireupdate.com/ No


APPENDIX B



Terms Used by the NOC When Monitoring Social Media Sites

This is a current list of terms that will be used by the NOC when monitoring social media sites to provide situational awareness and establish a common operating picture. As natural or manmade disasters occur, new search terms may be added. The new search terms will not use PII in searching for relevant mission-related information.



DHS & Other Agencies

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Coast Guard (USCG)

Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Border Patrol

Secret Service (USSS)

NationalOperationsCenter(NOC)

Homeland Defense

Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Agent

Task Force

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

FusionCenter

Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)

Secure Border Initiative (SBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF)

U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS)

Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Air Marshal

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

National Guard

Red Cross

United Nations (UN)

Domestic Security

Assassination

Attack

Domestic security

Drill

Exercise

Cops

Law enforcement

Authorities

Disaster assistance

Disaster management

DNDO (Domestic Nuclear Detection Office)

National preparedness

Mitigation

Prevention

Response

Recovery

Dirty bomb

Domestic nuclear detection

Emergency management

Emergency response

First responder

Homeland security

Maritime domain awareness (MDA)

National preparedness initiative

Militia

Shooting

Shots fired

Evacuation

Deaths

Hostage

Explosion (explosive)

Police

Disaster medical assistance team (DMAT)

Organized crime

Gangs

National security

State of emergency

Security

Breach

Threat

Standoff

SWAT

Screening

Lockdown

Bomb (squad or threat)

Crash

Looting

Riot

Emergency Landing

Pipe bomb

Incident

Facility

HAZMAT & Nuclear

Hazmat

Nuclear

Chemical spill

Suspicious package/device

Toxic

National laboratory

Nuclear facility

Nuclear threat

Cloud

Plume

Radiation

Radioactive

Leak

Biological infection (or event)

Chemical

Chemical burn

Biological

Epidemic

Hazardous

Hazardous material incident

Industrial spill

Infection

Powder (white)

Gas

Spillover

Anthrax

Blister agent

Chemical agent

Exposure

Burn

Nerve agent

Ricin

Sarin

North Korea

Health Concern + H1N1

Outbreak

Contamination

Exposure

Virus

Evacuation

Bacteria

Recall

Ebola

Food Poisoning

Foot and Mouth (FMD)

H5N1

Avian

Flu

Salmonella

Small Pox

Plague

Human to human

Human to Animal

Influenza

Center for Disease Control (CDC)

Drug Administration (FDA)

Public Health

Toxic

Agro Terror

Tuberculosis (TB)

Agriculture

Listeria

Symptoms

Mutation

Resistant

Antiviral

Wave

Pandemic

Infection

Water/air borne

Sick

Swine

Pork

Strain

Quarantine

H1N1

Vaccine

Tamiflu

Norvo Virus

Epidemic

World Health Organization (WHO) (and components)

Viral Hemorrhagic Fever

E. Coli

Infrastructure Security

Infrastructure security

Airport

Airplane (and derivatives)

Chemical fire

CIKR (Critical Infrastructure & Key Resources)

AMTRAK

Collapse

Computer infrastructure

Communications infrastructure

Telecommunications

Critical infrastructure

National infrastructure

Metro

WMATA

Subway

BART

MARTA

Port Authority

NBIC (NationalBiosurveillanceIntegrationCenter)

Transportation security

Grid

Power

Smart

Body scanner

Electric

Failure or outage

Black out

Brown out

Port

Dock

Bridge

Cancelled

Delays

Service disruption

Power lines

Southwest Border Violence

Drug cartel

Violence

Gang

Drug

Narcotics

Cocaine

Marijuana

Heroin

Border

Mexico

Cartel

Southwest

Juarez

Sinaloa

Tijuana

Torreon

Yuma

Tucson

Decapitated

U.S.Consulate

Consular

El Paso

FortHancock

San Diego

Ciudad Juarez

Nogales

Sonora

Colombia

Mara salvatrucha

MS13 or MS-13

Drug war

Mexican army

Methamphetamine

Cartel de Golfo

Gulf Cartel

La Familia

Reynosa

NuevoLeon

Narcos

Narco banners (Spanish equivalents)

Los Zetas

Shootout

Execution

Gunfight

Trafficking

Kidnap

Calderon

Reyosa

Bust

Tamaulipas

Meth Lab

Drug trade

Illegal immigrants

Smuggling (smugglers)

Matamoros

Michoacana

Guzman

Arellano-Felix

Beltran-Leyva

Barrio Azteca

Artistic Assassins

Mexicles

New Federation

Terrorism

Terrorism

Al Qaeda (all spellings)

Terror

Attack

Iraq

Afghanistan

Iran

Pakistan

Agro

Environmental terrorist

Eco terrorism

Conventional weapon

Target

Weapons grade

Dirty bomb

Enriched

Nuclear

Chemical weapon

Biological weapon

Ammonium nitrate

Improvised explosive device

IED (Improvised Explosive Device)

Abu Sayyaf

Hamas

FARC (Armed Revolutionary ForcesColombia)

IRA (Irish Republican Army)

ETA (Euskadi ta Askatasuna) Basque Separatists

Hezbollah

Tamil Tigers

PLF (PalestineLiberation Front)

PLO (PalestineLiberation Organization

Car bomb

Jihad

Taliban

Weapons cache

Suicide bomber

Suicide attack

Suspicious substance

AQAP (AL Qaeda ArabianPeninsula)

AQIM (Al Qaeda in the IslamicMaghreb)

TTP (Tehrik-i-TalibanPakistan)

Yemen

Pirates

Extremism

Somalia

Nigeria

Radicals

Al-Shabaab

Home grown

Plot

Nationalist

Recruitment

Fundamentalism

Islamist

Weather/Disaster/Emergency

Emergency

Hurricane

Tornado

Twister

Tsunami

Earthquake

Tremor

Flood

Storm

Crest

Temblor

Extreme weather

Forestfire

Brush fire

Ice

Stranded/Stuck

Help

Hail

Wildfire

TsunamiWarningCenter

Magnitude

Avalanche

Typhoon

Shelter-in-place

Disaster

Snow

Blizzard

Sleet

Mud slide or Mudslide

Erosion

Power outage

Brown out

Warning

Watch

Lightening

Aid

Relief

Closure

Interstate

Burst

Emergency Broadcast System

Cyber Security

Cyber security

Botnet

DDOS (dedicated denial of service)

Denial of service

Malware

Virus

Trojan

Keylogger

Cyber Command

2600

Spammer

Phishing

Rootkit

Phreaking

Cain and abel

Brute forcing

Mysql injection

Cyber attack

Cyber terror

Hacker

China

Conficker

Worm

Scammers

Social media

Other

Breaking News

(Also See)

Privacy Compliance Review of the Social Media Monitoring and Situational Awareness Initiative of 2011 FULL TEXT

[kayden]

Hope they are reading...I own a BIG BIG DOG!....lol

[Woodland Detectors]

Of course they do! The IRS (Inquisitive Relic Savers) monitor here by the thousands daily.

[Frankn]

Is this a can of worms or what? Frank

[maipenrai]

Paranoid? Yes!! The IRS is not after your wheatie or even your dimes. We are not really as important as we would like to be. If the IRS is looking for treasure hunters, that have not paid taxes, Big treasure hunters, they are not wasting their time watching us in the park or beach with our detectors.