IMAUDIGGER
Silver Member
- Mar 16, 2016
- 3,400
- 5,194
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
And now every Dirt Patch is now covered with Asphalt
stoneshirt.
Not in my reality. Not what I look at every day.
And now every Dirt Patch is now covered with Asphalt
stoneshirt.
only to a point, what is your carrying capacity?
I think a book was written about such
Also true. Which is why nuclear is the only real current answer, despite the fact it is persona non grata in the US. It’s safe, clean, and efficient.
I feel like I’m looking at the smoldering wreckage of a passenger jet while hearing a survivor say it’s safe,clean, and efficient.
Fukushima is getting ready to dump 1,000,000 tons of radioactive water waste into the seas where our salmon migrate through. Meanwhile they cross their fingers that their 100 foot tall ice curtain doesn’t melt for another 1000 years or however long it takes mankind to invent technology to abate the disaster.
Then there’s the new (second) lead coffin over Russia’s Chernobyl disaster...we are good for another 100 years, at which time we will have had to invented some new technology. We can’t keep encapsulating lead buildings with larger lead buildings every 100 years!
When it goes wrong, it’s really really bad.
What you are saying is absolutely true. There is the possibility for things to go very very bad, obviously. That being said... every nuclear power incident that has occurred has been preventable. What you never hear mentioned are the times that safety protocols were followed in safe nuclear plants and when incidents occurred the units automatically shut down with no release of radiation. It’s also worth mentioning that we have been studying nuclear energy for less than 100 years and we are absolutely in its infancy. The power plants that have had problems were built less than 30 years after we first harnessed the atom. What makes nuclear energy scary to people is that it’s something they can’t see that poses the risk to them.
You can ask pretty much any energy professional without a political stake and they will tell you the same thing. Based on our current technology and increasing energy demand, nuclear is literally our only option if we, as humans continue on our current trajectory. Solar and Wind just are not efficient l. Even here in California, where we are at the forefront of renewable energy we are just running a greater and greater power deficit all the time. Just wait, if and when, Diablo Canyon shuts down, the real circus begins. We couldn’t install enough solar panels in this state to keep the lights on without buying power from another state.
As a sidebar... last year we had ONE day, the first day ever, where we, as Californians, generated more power than we used. Less than 20% of that came from Wind and Solar. The unfortunate truth is, we cannot have our cake and eat it too. Despite California’s believe otherwise. Sorry I derailed a bit there. Nuclear power is almost TWICE as energy efficient as its next nearest competitor, natural gas. It’s also carbon free. France produces 75% of its power from nuclear. Now they are trying to reduce that to 50% and they are projecting the average annual power bill there for a family to go up €1000 euro a year.
What you are saying is absolutely true. There is the possibility for things to go very very bad, obviously. That being said... every nuclear power incident that has occurred has been preventable. What you never hear mentioned are the times that safety protocols were followed in safe nuclear plants and when incidents occurred the units automatically shut down with no release of radiation. It’s also worth mentioning that we have been studying nuclear energy for less than 100 years and we are absolutely in its infancy. The power plants that have had problems were built less than 30 years after we first harnessed the atom. What makes nuclear energy scary to people is that it’s something they can’t see that poses the risk to them.
You can ask pretty much any energy professional without a political stake and they will tell you the same thing. Based on our current technology and increasing energy demand, nuclear is literally our only option if we, as humans continue on our current trajectory. Solar and Wind just are not efficient l. Even here in California, where we are at the forefront of renewable energy we are just running a greater and greater power deficit all the time. Just wait, if and when, Diablo Canyon shuts down, the real circus begins. We couldn’t install enough solar panels in this state to keep the lights on without buying power from another state.
As a sidebar... last year we had ONE day, the first day ever, where we, as Californians, generated more power than we used. Less than 20% of that came from Wind and Solar. The unfortunate truth is, we cannot have our cake and eat it too. Despite California’s believe otherwise. Sorry I derailed a bit there. Nuclear power is almost TWICE as energy efficient as its next nearest competitor, natural gas. It’s also carbon free. France produces 75% of its power from nuclear. Now they are trying to reduce that to 50% and they are projecting the average annual power bill there for a family to go up €1000 euro a year.
Yes preventable...(doesn’t help with all the radioactive waste piling up), but it’s very difficult or impossible to eliminate human nature. We have dictators who’s population live in tents and herd goats for a living that are trying to use nuclear power and make earth destroying nuclear missiles. The technology is likely to MAKE OR BREAK this planet. The risk is huge and very real.
My family has two houses that are off grid...very meager power sources. Very inexpensive components and readily available.
Our problem isn’t a power source...it’s STORAGE of power. The sooner we figure that out, the sooner we move on from using so much of our current sources. Sunlight and fossil fuels are all we need in my opinion. Sunlight is really amazingly powerful when you look at what a 2’x4’ area will power with storage.
It’s kind of like a very small water spring...with plenty of storage you can live and grow things. Without it, it’s nothing but wet.
Nuclear plants are nearly impossible to build here in the U.S. The costs balloon. The workers feel each plant's construction is a lifetime career. Do as little as you can each day to make it last, steal or "disappear" materials. Corruption is so bad, TOP to bottom, the construction is the money maker, not the completion. Money for all. I have now lived in two states, Washington and South Carolina, whose citizens have had to cough up billions and billions of dollars, to bail out bankrupt nuclear projects. To prove it will happen again, no one goes to prison for the thefts. They are made legal through commissions, bonuses, special expense accounts, and numerous offshore accounts ( speculation on my part, but really ). Cost increases and overruns. No accounting, no questioning. When officials are questioned, they simply lie or lie through omission. In a nuclear plant, as has been demonstrated, you just need one person to override the safety systems and voila!
In theory, nuclear is the answer. In reality, until corruption becomes shameful and wrong in the minds of the general population, more nuclear is dead in America. It's like a mice infestation, they will eat or despoil all of the grain, long before it becomes a loaf of bread.
how many have the rights to a 150' drop, plus the water?
you are fortunate, why preach?
Kray...madness from the sound ? Apparently you have never been around a windmill. You have a better chance of going mad from listening to the threshold of your detector..