California, is set to outlaw ... gold prospecting

Minstrel

Hero Member
Oct 12, 2008
520
3
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Detector(s) used
Garrett-GTI-2500
California, the state built on gold prospecting, is set to outlaw ... gold prospecting



There's gold in them thar hills, but pretty soon you won't be allowed to touch it.

In California, the state built on gold, the time is up for prospectors who are about to see their way of life declared illegal.

Just 162 years after history's biggest gold rush, diggers - or dredgers as they now are - are losing a long-running battle with environmentalists.



The reason for this mammoth fight is ... salmon.

At the center of the battle is suction dredging, today's mechanized version of gold panning.

Up to 4,000 people in California use suction dredging to extract gold.

It involves motorized rigs which act like giant vacuum cleaners, sucking up mud and gravel from the bottom of a watercourse and then using gravity to sort tiny quantities of gold from the rocks and dirt.

Environmentalists say the technique disturbs riverbeds where fish such as pacific salmon lay their eggs.



The salmon population has fallen steeply in the Golden State.

The environmentalists also say the dredging releases poisonous mercury into the water.

They persuaded California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to agree to a two-year moratorium on suction dredging in 2009 while scientists compile an impact report.

The 800-page report has been finished at a cost of $1.5million.

It recommends that the dredging can carry on, but under a strict set of conditions dictating the size of the machines and when they can be used.

It says that dredging should be banned in some ecologically important rivers and streams.



The report's findings are due to come into effect in six months.

But opponents of dredging, with the help of Democratic state assemblyman Jared Huffman, have managed to amend California's proposed budget in a way that will extend the moratorium for at least five years, and maybe forever.

A paragraph in the document was changed to ensure that the Department of Fish and Game cannot spend any money reissuing dredging licenses until 2017.

People in the gold business are not too happy about the amendment.

Rachel Dunn, an amateur prospector who runs Gold Pan California in Sacramento, said: 'It's crazy. It's a circumvention of due process, in which a cheap political maneuver has been used to circumvent science.



'They should be ashamed. Gold is the industry that built California. What they are doing is just total lunacy.'

Gold prices are currently at a record high of more than $1,500 an ounce.

With California's unemployment rate at ten per cent, critics say the state cannot afford to criminalize potentially lucrative industry.

Many communities in remote areas rely on income from the prospectors who visit each year, the Independent on Sunday reports.

Bruce Johnson, who owns a campground in Seiad Valley in the heart of gold country, said: 'We are holding on for dear life out here and the gold miners could immediately help ease the burden. Is the legislation intentionally dysfunctional?'
 

Upvote 0

LonghornFan

Newbie
Aug 16, 2011
1
0
Okay guys, here's an idea I think will drive them all nuts... On my claim, the creek is one side of the canyon and I have a hundred feet of bar to work in. When we dug down eight feet, the water flow was such that we could dredge and not suck the hole dry. How would dredging in the middle of a dry bar impact the fishies???? Maybe, just maybe, if we all take our smaller dredges out and dig to the water table on the sand bars, the State people would be so confused their brains would just burn up right there on the side of the road while they try to figure out how to harass us... it's worth a try!
 

jog

Bronze Member
Nov 28, 2008
1,364
682
Tillamook Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites MXT / GMT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Has anyone in Cal, gone to the local Sheriff in there county and asked them what there take is on this whole DFG thing? Might be worth a trip just to see what power they really do or don't have. After all, it's the Sherriffs county not theres.
 

russau

Gold Member
May 29, 2005
7,244
6,695
St. Louis, missouri
If caught,you will be cited if you even have a dredge within 100 yards of a stream,so ive been told!i think if you own that property and had a dredge stored there and got cited, you could beat that citation in court and ask for all your funds/attorneys fees returned to you! thats just my swing on things!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top