EPA/COE seeks to expand the CWA

[russau]

this was just sent to me from Jim Foley: http://www.capwiz.com/cfbf/issues/alert/?alertid=50832556&type=CU the EPA and the COE are wanting to stop/prevent useage of the waters and now the land also! if this goes unchallenged, it will mean a stop to mining/prospecting/dredgeing in the USA! its now in your back yard and not a west coast thing anymore! the site has both email and letters for your comments, but remember, these are form letters and only count a 1. better to use them as a basis for your own words. we need your help now! please help!

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[Hefty1]

Done.

Hefty

 

[russau]

thankyou! and the people that dont beleive it or just wont lift a finger to help thanks you also even though they dont know it!

 

[Astrobouncer]

I am working on it right now too, but honestly the way things are going lately, I bet mining of any kind (except for big corporations for can pay the $$$ to the right people) will be illegal in the coming years.

 

[oragonads]

I am working on it right now too, but honestly the way things are going lately, I bet mining of any kind (except for big corporations for can pay the $$$ to the right people) will be illegal in the coming years.

Screw them, they won't stop me.

 

[2cmorau]

it took a while but got it done

man, not like farmers and ranchers got it easy, put up with all kinds of BS from the treehugginwackhos
mining and farming the two things all should support and the left wing fools want to shut it down.
christ, this S!!! pissin me off
won't be long now when leads gets to the price of gold,

 

[russau]

I am working on it right now too, but honestly the way things are going lately, I bet mining of any kind (except for big corporations for can pay the $$$ to the right people) will be illegal in the coming years.

*******it probly will if we dont contest this ourright abuse of power from the gubermint greenies! if we dont fight for it, we dont deserve it! im tired of being dominated over by our socalled "representatives" and their GREED! its time for our true representatives be for more than their party and start representing America and Her people!

 

[Goldbear]

Done

 

[russau]

Screw them, they won't stop me. ***********thats fine! i dont blaime you! but what about the 1000s of other that will/can get stopped?? your letter of opposition is very important to all!
[/quote]

 

[GrayCloud]

Last week while all eyes were on pencil neck wiener, obama signed an executive order, mandating a U.N. Policy. That policy foremate is to eliminate private owner ship of agriculture and mining lands. The premise is that individuals are not knowledgeable enough to best utilize the land. Government will be more responsive and use the land best for the benefit of the mass. Look it up Boys, I don't make these things up.

 

[Goldbear]

GreyCloud - I could not find anything on that. Please post a link if you have one.

 

[GrayCloud]

Goldbear you can find it in The Blaze. IT was Executive Order #13575 and then look at Section One. It is almost a duplicate of the United Nations Agenda 21. If you cannot find it, PM me your email and I will forward it to you.

 

[russau]

the good people of America need to know this, but most of them dont care either way about what they have no idea just happened! the scream about whats going on in America, but they dont want to lift a finger to find out whats going out the back door!

 

[oragonads]

Screw them, they won't stop me. ***********thats fine! i dont blaime you! but what about the 1000s of other that will/can get stopped?? your letter of opposition is very important to all!

[/quote]

Sorry, I didn't mean that in a selfish way. I meant that in a last resort kind of way.

 

[Hefty1]

Why not just post it for all to read.

Hefty




Government
Does The New ‘White House Rural Council’ = UN’s Agenda 21?
Posted on June 21, 2011 at 2:34pm by Mike Opelka Print » Email » On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed his 86th Executive Order, and almost nobody noticed.

(For the record, Obama is on par to match President Bush’s 291 orders executed during his two terms in office. The National Archives defines an Executive Order this way; Executive orders are official documents, numbered consecutively, through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government.)

President Obama’s E.O. 13575 is designed to begin taking control over almost all aspects of the lives of 16% of the American people. Why didn’t we notice it? Weinergate. In the middle of the Anthony Weiner scandal, as the press and most of the American people were distracted, President Obama created something called “The White House Rural Council” (WHRC).

Section One of 13575 states the following:

Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.

Warning bells should have been sounding all across rural America when the phrase “sustainable rural communities” came up. As we know from researching the UN plan for Sustainable Development known as Agenda 21, these are code words for the true fundamental transformation America.



The third sentence also makes it quite clear that the government intends to take greater control over “food, fiber, and energy.”

The last sentence in Section 1 further clarifies the intent of the order by tying together “access to the capital necessary for economic growth, health care and education.”

The new White House Rural Council will probably be populated by experts in the various fields that might prove helpful to the folks who live and work outside of large urban areas, right? Well, Tom Vilsack, the current Secretary of Agriculture, will chair the group, but let us review the list of members appointed to serve on this new council – according to the order, the heads of the following groups have been appointed:

(1) the Department of the Treasury; Timothy Geithner
(2) the Department of Defense; Robert Gates
(3) the Department of Justice; Eric Holder
(4) the Department of the Interior; Ken Salazar
(5) the Department of Commerce; Gary Locke
(6) the Department of Labor; Hilda Solis
(7) the Department of Health and Human Services; Kathleen Sebelius
(8) the Department of Housing and Urban Development; Shaun Donovan
(9) the Department of Transportation; Ray LaHood
(10) the Department of Energy; Dr. Steven Chu
(11) the Department of Education; Arne Duncan
(12) the Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric Shinseki
(13) the Department of Homeland Security; Janet Napolitano
(14) the Environmental Protection Agency; Lisa Jackson
(15) the Federal Communications Commission; Michael Copps
(16) the Office of Management and Budget; Peter Orszag
(17) the Office of Science and Technology Policy; John Holdren
(18) the Office of National Drug Control Policy; R. Gil Kerlikowske
(19) the Council of Economic Advisers; Austan Goolsbee
(20) the Domestic Policy Council; Melody Barnes (former VP at Center for American Progress)
(21) the National Economic Council; Gene B. Sperling
(22) the Small Business Administration; Karen Mills
(23) the Council on Environmental Quality; Nancy Sutley
(24) the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs; Valerie Jarrett
(25) the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs; and such other executive branch departments, agencies, and offices as the President or Secretary of Agriculture may, from time to time, designate. Chris Lu (or virtually anyone to be designated by the 24 people named above)
It appears that not a single department in the federal government was excluded from the new White House Rural Council, and the wild card option in number 25 gives the president and the agriculture secretary the option to designate anyone to serve on this powerful council.

Within the twenty-five designated members of the council are some curious ties to Agenda 21 and the structure being built to implement it:

Valerie Jarrett from the White House Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs served on the board of something called Local Initiatives Support Corportation (LISC). LISC uses the language of Agenda 21 and ICLEI as their web page details their work to build “Sustainable Communities.”

Melody Barnes head of the Domestic Policy Council – Former VP at George Soros-funded Center for American Progress.

Hilda Solis from the Labor Dept – in 2000 received an award for her work on “Environmental Justice.”

Nancy Sutley head of the White House Council on Environmental Quality – Served on the board of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District and was one of the biggest supporters of low-flow toilets that are now credited with costing more money than expected while causing some nasty problems.

Is it possible that concerns about 13575 are just typical anti-government paranoia? Let us review the mission and function of WHRC:

Sec. 4. Mission and Function of the Council. The Council shall work across executive departments, agencies, and offices to coordinate development of policy recommendations to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in rural America, and shall coordinate my Administration’s engagement with rural communities.

“Economic prosperity” and a better “quality of life,” that all sounds fairly innocent and well-intentioned. But continuing deeper into the order we find the council is charged with four directives:

(a) make recommendations to the President, through the Director of the Domestic Policy Council and the Director of the National Economic Council, on streamlining and leveraging Federal investments in rural areas, where appropriate, to increase the impact of Federal dollars and create economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America;

The vague language here sounds non-threatening. But, is there a hint here that a “rural stimulus plan” might be in the making? Will the Federal government start pumping money into farmlands under the guise of creating “economic opportunities to improve the quality of life in rural America?” It is difficult to discern as the language is so broad.

We continue with the functions of the WHRC:

(b) coordinate and increase the effectiveness of Federal engagement with rural stakeholders, including agricultural organizations, small businesses, education and training institutions, health-care providers, telecommunications services providers, research and land grant institutions, law enforcement, State, local, and tribal governments, and nongovernmental organizations regarding the needs of rural America;

Virtually every aspect of rural life seems to now be part of the government’s mission. And while all of the items in (b) sound like typical government speak, you should be alarmed when you read the words “nongovernmental organizations” (NGOs). NGOs are unelected, but typically government-funded groups that act like embedded community organizers. And NGOs are key to Agenda 21′s plans.

Continuing:

(c) coordinate Federal efforts directed toward the growth and development of geographic regions that encompass both urban and rural areas;

That one sounds very similar to the language found in the United Nations plan for sustainable cities known as Agenda 21. Managing the population in both rural and urban areas, with a focus on controlling “open spaces.”

(d) and identify and facilitate rural economic opportunities associated with energy development, outdoor recreation, and other conservation related activities.

This function of Executive Order 13575 ties energy development with outdoor recreation and “other conservation related activities.” When did outdoor recreation become a conservation related activity?

Aside from the content of this order and some its vague intentions, the timing of the signing should also be considered. Later this month, Washington DC is hosting a meeting of the Agenda 21 operatives who are members of ICLEI:

Washington, D.C. – ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability USA (ICLEI USA) and U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) today announced the launch of the National Press Club Leadership Speaker Series to be held on June 28. The event’s inaugural keynote speaker will be the Honorable Sha Zukang, Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), whose keynote address, The Road to Rio+20, will explain the role of key global and national stakeholders, and the impact and vision of this historic conference.

As Secretary-General of Rio+20, Ambassador Sha Zukang will convene high-ranking leaders from government, the private sector and civil society to chart a pathway to accelerate the implementation of sustainable development decisions and the green economy through the creation of an institutional framework and inclusive participation.

The United Nations has pushed their sustainable development program for almost twenty years. The UN’s “social justice” blueprint called Agenda 21 requires governments to control almost all aspects of an individual’s life, but has recently met with substantial resistance in America. Since The Blaze covered this topic and the story appeared on Glenn Beck’s Fox TV program, we have been inundated with reports from around the country about efforts to remove ICLEI and Agenda 21 from local governments.

Carroll County, Maryland: Starting in February, 2011, all five newly elected county commissioners, led by Richard Rothschild, voted to become the first county in the nation to end the ICLEI contract.


Amador County, California: The Mother Lode Tea Party lead the successful effort to remove ICLEI form Amador County.

Montgomery County, Pennsylvania: Activists Ruth Miller and Maggie Roddin have raised awareness that lead to the removal of ICLEI.

Edmond, Oklahoma: Molly Jenkins motivated 200 people to attend the city council meeting and demand action against ICLEI.

Las Cruces, New Mexico: continues to debate the issue, but rational voices are gaining momentum in the community.


Spartanburg, South Carolina: City Councilman Roger Nutt successfully directed the effort against the program and Spartanburg became the 6th community to kick out ICLEI in a vote of 6-0 by City Council (with one abstention).

There have also been anti-ICLEI rallies held in several cities this week, with more planned in the near future:

June 27, 11:30am-3:00pm
Exeter, NH, Exeter High School
June 27, 5:00pm-8:30pm
Galveston, TX, Galveston Convention Center
June 27, 8:30am-5:00pm
Ocean Shores, WA, Quinault Beach Resort and Casino
June 30, 1:00pm-5:00pm
San Francisco Bay Area, CA, TBD
June 30, 10:00am-5:00pm
West Long Branch, NJ, Monmouth University
There appears to be a developing, grass-roots movement to reject programs like Agenda 21. It remains to be seen if these groups might also reject a Washington-based control over rural lands, like the council created by Executive Order 13575.

As long as there’s not another Weinergate, maybe they’ll notice.

 

[russau]

thankyou for posting this!! ive been trying to inform/warn people of agenda 21 for several years but nobody would beleive it or want to read about it! well guess what! o has also signed somesort of document with the UN that involves our property rights. this also includes MINING CLAIMS. i hope people will get off their duffs and kick their buddys in their duffs to stand up and do something for a change instead of "letting" someone else do it for them, and then complain!

 

[GrayCloud]

Thanks Hefty, For posting the info for us. I agree with Russa and have sounded the alarm to all that will listen. These are bad people in the White House and so are many in the democrat party. Wieners wife, a muslim who is also Clintons sidekick, has a brother and mother involved with the muslim brotherhood. This is a fact, while this b----h has access to everything that clinton ho has access to. GO FIGURE. We are in deep trouble.

 

[2cmorau]

another interesting read


http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/articles/Tides Foundation and Tides Center1.htm

 

[davin]

they keep taking our rights away little by little and day to day, they do not stop. we got to vote those nuts out and get our country
back.
take care. ron

 

[russau]

we have been trying to do just that! we ,as a nation, need to get these party minded people out of office! then we need to find people that really do want to help our Country and her people get out of this $$$$$$/ecconomic whirlwind!