Goldgrabber

Full Member
Mar 24, 2015
183
257
England, UK
Detector(s) used
Minelab X-Terra 705
Primary Interest:
Other
Hi guys, I just got back from my second prospecting trip of the year, trying new creeks in the area I visit each time. This time I visited a very narrow creek with a lot of exposed bedrock, however, the creek was very narrow which made getting my sluice set up rather difficult. In the end, I managed to have my sluice sitting off a bedrock wall being fed with water from a waterfall above it. Admittedly the flow and angle are not 100% how I would have liked them, but it was the best I could get set up without having to walk a long distance carrying a heavy bucket of material. Anyway, have a look and let me know what you think:

https://youtu.be/tloHjnwx_Hc
 

Upvote 0

spaghettigold

Hero Member
Oct 14, 2013
566
784
western sahara
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
looks like a good compromise with the given geology.maybe a tad lesser slope at the end of the sluice?

Good gravity sluicing creeks you have there ,are allowed to use a hose in uk?
 

OP
OP
Goldgrabber

Goldgrabber

Full Member
Mar 24, 2015
183
257
England, UK
Detector(s) used
Minelab X-Terra 705
Primary Interest:
Other
I couldn't really adjust the angle as the sluice is sat on a bedrock slope and getting anything under the end would have destabilised the sluice.

The creeks are perfect for gravity dredging and some people do it, however, it is a grey area and frowned upon in the UK because although it's a manual technique, it's still deemed a more professional extraction method. It's not allowed where I prospect as only hand tools are allowed but may be allowed if on private land and the waterway is not protected in any way.
 

spaghettigold

Hero Member
Oct 14, 2013
566
784
western sahara
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
yes, the bedrock is a slippery surface for the sluice,i understand,.

Funny how globalised the rulings are,based on...

Heavy pans grabber:occasion14:
 

meMiner

Bronze Member
Jul 22, 2014
1,047
1,176
Port Perry, Ontario
Detector(s) used
Minelab 800,
Fisher CZ21, F75SE, Gold Bug 2.9 & Minelab GPX 5000
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
The kind of sluice you are using can be used aggressively, so I would not be worried too much about the angle and water. Only thing I would have done different is I would have put a big flat rock on top of the sluice so it does not float away expectantly. You sure found a pretty place to prospect.
 

Hoser John

Gold Member
Mar 22, 2003
5,854
6,721
Redding,Calif.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Nothing in this life is 100% ,just do the best ya can and coveth them golden flakes for a lifetime-kudos over there on the island. John :hello2:
 

GoldpannerDave

Bronze Member
Apr 17, 2014
1,076
1,279
Colorado Springs, CO
Detector(s) used
Bazooka 48" Miner and 30" Sniper, Le Trap, Wolf Trap, A52, 2" dredge, Miller tables, Blue Bowl, wheel, Falcon MD20, old White's detector
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Beautiful, yet desolate-looking territory. And I didn't even see sheep on the hillsides. Other desolate-looking areas I have visited in the UK, like Wrynose Pass and parts of Wales still had sheep around. Looking forward to seeing the gold.
 

OP
OP
Goldgrabber

Goldgrabber

Full Member
Mar 24, 2015
183
257
England, UK
Detector(s) used
Minelab X-Terra 705
Primary Interest:
Other
Cheers guys, yes there were plenty of sheep kicking about, they were just up the hillside as my dog kept them at distance as it's lambing season and they can be protective of their lambs. I would have put a rock on top, I usually do, however it just felt sturdy where it sat and didn't move if I gave it a wobble so felt comfortable it wasn't going to go flying down the stream and it made it easier removing it to clean out without a rock due to the angle it was sat at
 

goldog

Hero Member
Sep 25, 2012
923
987
Tujunga, CA
Detector(s) used
Bazooka Gold Trap, A-51, Gold Pan
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
I see no problem with the spot you chose. It looks like you could use something to direct more of the water through your sluice, as much is going under.
 

et1955

Hero Member
Jan 10, 2015
913
1,783
Shoreline,wa
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Here are a few mods you might want to add to your sluice, the first is to add a flap to the front of your sluice, not only will it create an instant dam increasing water flow but also it holds your sluice down, no more using rocks to hold it down. Next add black ribbed mat in the front area of the your sluice, this will instantly show if you are on the gold. 2015-03-10 16.24.53.jpg 20150125_113350.jpg
 

OP
OP
Goldgrabber

Goldgrabber

Full Member
Mar 24, 2015
183
257
England, UK
Detector(s) used
Minelab X-Terra 705
Primary Interest:
Other
I've already bought some fine ribbed rubber matting which I've been thinking of putting at the top of my sluice, it does however already have ribbing in the mold of the sluice and it if catches any gold at the top, it's easily visible, they just aren't quite as deep as the rubber matting I've bought.
 

OP
OP
Goldgrabber

Goldgrabber

Full Member
Mar 24, 2015
183
257
England, UK
Detector(s) used
Minelab X-Terra 705
Primary Interest:
Other
I think I'll make a gutter sluice for this area as well, should be able to get it set up where a standard size sluice will have no chance
 

Duckwalk

Hero Member
Mar 21, 2014
966
1,312
Lincolnton North Carolina
Detector(s) used
30" Bazooka Sniper, Drop Riffle sluice box.
Various Gold Pans
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Love watching your videos! I was trying to figure out why the riffles were holding material so unevenly. The first riffle was holding, nothing in 2 and 3 and the rest were holding plenty. Any idea?
 

OP
OP
Goldgrabber

Goldgrabber

Full Member
Mar 24, 2015
183
257
England, UK
Detector(s) used
Minelab X-Terra 705
Primary Interest:
Other
Cheers Duck, I think where the sluice retains the material all depends on the V flow going through the top flare and where they meet in the sluice channel. Because this water was quite fast flowing and I didn't have a perfect V, the water merged from either side of the flare further down the sluice, which was why it cleared out the first couple of steps. If the water was slowing more slowly or with less angle, the flare would create a better V formation closer to the top and that's when the top drop riffle steps hold more material. You can see this in some of my other videos where the sluice is running in different flows and it retains material at different places according to the flow
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top