Welcome guest, is this your first visit?
Member
Discoveries
 
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    us
    Apr 2009
    Cuyahoga Falls, Oh
    CZ21 CZ3D Tesoro Cortez
    38

    Tiger Shark vs. CZ 21

    Just got a used twice, Tiger, Will this unit find any gold, in 4 lakes that me and my buddy pounded relentlessly for 3 years both using CZ 21

  2. #2
    Charter Member
    us
    Director-Search & Recovery Team of Oakland County.

    Aug 2005
    In Michigan now.
    Excal 1000, Sovereign GT, CZ-20, Tiger Shark, Tejon, GTI 1500, Surfmaster Pulse, CZ6a, DFX, AT PRO, many more.
    9,430
    57 times
    All Types Of Treasure Hunting

    Re: Tiger Shark vs. CZ 21

    Oh boy, what a question. I have used most of the water detectors and can say that the use of a Tiger Shark will pull more gold jewelry out of those lakes and even smaller pieces. Granted the CZ-21's and older 20's are good, I thought the Excal 1000 was deeper as I was started pulling more rings out of places I had the CZ's working. It might also just be the difference in the area where the coils field covers too. The Tiger has All Metal fast and slow none motion besides disc normal and saltwater mode. The newer ones will have the coils hardwired and it can be hip mounted too.
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    (C) Sandman, 2005. All Rights Reserved.
    "TIME IS THE ONLY THING YOU NEVER GET BACK, WHY WASTE IT SWINGING A DETECTOR THAT ISN'T UP TO THE TASK."

 

 

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

cz 21 vs tigershark

,

cz21 vs at pro

,

tiger shark vs cz21

Click on a term to search for related topics.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3