Welcome guest, is this your first visit?
Member
Discoveries
 
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    us
    See you in the funny papers!

    Dec 2008
    Tennessee
    White's MXT 300 w/950 coil, Bounty Hunter, Discover 3300 w/a 10" Bounty Hunter, Magnum Power Search Coil
    239
    Relic Hunting
    Banner Finds (1)

    MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    First of all, I want to say that I own a MXT 300 (with a 950 coil) and I am thinking of trading or buying a F-75.

    With weight aside, how do the machines compair overall?

    Which machine has more depth?

    Which machine has a more consistent VDI readings and target separation?

    Which machine has a more consistent VDI readings and target separation at greater depths?

    Which machine is more user friendly? Keep in mind I own a MXT.

    Thanks for the help!
    Keep your coil to the soil!

  2. #2
    Charter Member
    us
    Big Boys Hobbies

    Jul 2005
    Moore Oklahoma
    Call for your metal detecting needs!
    1,139
    2 times
    Metal Detecting

    Re: MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    I owned a MXT years ago. Good machine for what it is. The F-75 is WAY deeper than the MXT ever thought about being. Specially in boost mode on the LTD! Call or email me if you have questions or need info about pricing! Thanks!
    Best prices guaranteed. Contact me at Bart@BigBoysHobbies.net or Call or text 405-206-9010

  3. #3
    us
    Apr 2010
    27

    Re: MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    I'm with Stoops on this one.

    I would like to go first with weight although you specified it wasn't a factor. My wife uses the MXT with the 950 coil and is worn out by early afternoon. On the other hand, the 75 can be swung all day with moderate fatigue. Effectiveness goes down, is my point.

    You're looking at at least 2-3 inches deeper with the 75.

    VDI probably goes to Whites based on the MXT we have thatonly give a certain few IDs, such as "nickel," "bullet/button," etc. The 75 has 0-100 that you can learn where your desired target hit. But easier? The Whites. For relic hunting, the Fisher by far.

    User fiendly? Mm, possibly White's. Turn it on, ground balance, set disc, hunt. Fisher, turn it on, ground balance, set frequency (optional), set sens/disc, etc. But you're given much more control over your hunting than simply turning it on and it telling you that a ring lay below and it's a pull tab. Fisher gives you a number.

    I don't mind complicated machines. In addition to the Fisher, I use a Nautilus.

  4. #4
    us
    Proud member of the Wolfpack!!!

    Oct 2007
    Middle Tennessee
    I have used several different models from the 5 major brands but now use a Whites MXT with D2 DD coil
    563

    Re: MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    Quote Originally Posted by CSbrasshunter
    I'm with Stoops on this one.

    I would like to go first with weight although you specified it wasn't a factor. My wife uses the MXT with the 950 coil and is worn out by early afternoon. On the other hand, the 75 can be swung all day with moderate fatigue. Effectiveness goes down, is my point.

    You're looking at at least 2-3 inches deeper with the 75.

    VDI probably goes to Whites based on the MXT we have thatonly give a certain few IDs, such as "nickel," "bullet/button," etc. The 75 has 0-100 that you can learn where your desired target hit. But easier? The Whites. For relic hunting, the Fisher by far.

    User fiendly? Mm, possibly White's. Turn it on, ground balance, set disc, hunt. Fisher, turn it on, ground balance, set frequency (optional), set sens/disc, etc. But you're given much more control over your hunting than simply turning it on and it telling you that a ring lay below and it's a pull tab. Fisher gives you a number.

    I don't mind complicated machines. In addition to the Fisher, I use a Nautilus.
    MXT gives you a number also, along with a description and a bar graph. Go by the number. It may only have a description in words but the number gives you a better range. This goes for all of Whites mid to upper range priced machines.

  5. #5
    us
    Apr 2010
    27

    Re: MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    Makes sense BT. My wife rarely turns it loose though. She goes strictly by the words. She enjoys, make no mistake!

  6. #6
    us
    Proud member of the Wolfpack!!!

    Oct 2007
    Middle Tennessee
    I have used several different models from the 5 major brands but now use a Whites MXT with D2 DD coil
    563

    Re: MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    Which machine has a more consistent VDI readings and target separation at greater depths?


    Speaking from a stock coil standpoint I think the Fisher will have better separation due to the DD coil which comes stock on the machine. In my opinion if you want better target separation, save a few bucks and invest in a DD style coil for your MXT 300. I got the D2 for mine and have had the 6X10 DD in the past. Personally if you relic hunt I would go for the D2 as it has better depth than the 6x10. These are my 2 cents worth, Tim

  7. #7
    us
    Aug 2009
    White's MXT300
    920

    Re: MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    I really can't say about the F-75 but with my MXT and the D2 coil I can get dimes at 10"+, I would find it hard to believe you would get 2" to 3" more depth with an F-75. I would buy a D2 coil for your MXT. HH

  8. #8
    Charter Member
    us
    Big Boys Hobbies

    Jul 2005
    Moore Oklahoma
    Call for your metal detecting needs!
    1,139
    2 times
    Metal Detecting

    Re: MXT 300 VS F-75 for relics

    The new f75 ltd in all metal boost mode is about as deep of a machine as I have ever used. Don't forget fisher just came out with a 15" coil too. If it's depth you want thats no doubly tue way to go.
    Best prices guaranteed. Contact me at Bart@BigBoysHobbies.net or Call or text 405-206-9010

 

 

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

white mxt 300

Click on a term to search for related topics.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3