|
-
May 12, 2011, 01:16 PM
#1
Garrett Ace 250 vs Fisher F2
Garrett Ace 250 vs Fisher F2
Does anyone have experience using both machines and if so, out of the two which do you prefer and why?
-
May 12, 2011, 02:58 PM
#2
Re: Garrett Ace 250 vs Fisher F2
Found an air test comparison
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syqBp4bEZUQ[/youtube]
-
May 13, 2011, 10:11 AM
#3
Re: Garrett Ace 250 vs Fisher F2
I found the F2 not as good when it came out. The late models have either been improved or I tried a lemon as now the F2 is deeper. Faster in use, more sensitive and the target resolution is 100 segments compared with the 12 of the Garrett.
Better on wet sand as well, though neither will ever match multifrequency or a P.I.
I also preferred the balance/general feel of the Fisher.
-
May 22, 2011, 09:10 PM
#4
 Big Boys Hobbies
Re: Garrett Ace 250 vs Fisher F2
Fisher is lighter, easier to swing, faster recovery, and 5 year warranty compared to 2. I personally highly recommend the F2 over the 250 for several reasons.
Best prices guaranteed. Contact me at Bart@BigBoysHobbies.net or Call or text 405-206-9010

-
May 21, 2012, 07:31 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by Bart@Big Boys Hobbies
Fisher is lighter, easier to swing, faster recovery, and 5 year warranty compared to 2. I personally highly recommend the F2 over the 250 for several reasons.
Does the pinpointing on the F2 work as well as on the ACE 250? I was leaning toward the 250, but these are interesting points you have mentioned.
-
May 22, 2012, 01:00 AM
#6
Pinpointing works better on the Fisher. The Garrett pinpoint seems to move off with depth.
-
May 22, 2012, 01:59 AM
#7
LRL fraud debunked
When the Garrett Ace 250 first came out, it redefined what you could get at an approx. $200 price point. It quickly became a popular low end unit, and still is.
FTP-Fisher took this as a challenge, and our answer was the Fisher F2. Performance, features, ergonomics, it's just plain better than the Ace 250. I'm not saying that to knock the Ace, after all, the Ace worked then and still does, and since it got there first it probably still outsells the F2 by a wide margin.
Now I suppose there are some Garrett fans here who may want to defend the Ace 250. That's fine, it's a good product in its price category. This thread asks the question which is better. Usually things like that are "apples and oranges", but in the case of the F2 vs. the Ace 250, they're similarly priced intended to do the same sort of job for the same sort of customers. Comparison is fair dinkum.
I don't think any Garrett fans will argue that performance-wise the Ace 250 is the sort of product that wants to take on the F2.
I don't think any Garrett fans will argue that the Ace 250 ergonomics are superior to those of the F2.
I don't think any Garrett fans will argue that the Ace 250 features add up to more useful stuff than the features of the F2.
I don't think any Garrett fans will argue that the Ace 250 has a better warranty.
--Dave J.
-
May 22, 2012, 12:17 PM
#8
Thanks very much for the responses. No offense to the ACE, but I'm now likely to go with the F2 and feel comfortable with that decision. I'm also looking at the options that come with it, I see they have a pinpointer kit.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
ace 250 or fisher f2, ace 250 vs fisher f2, fisher f2 compared to garrett ace 250, fisher f2 garrett ace 250, fisher f2 or garrett ace 250, fisher f2 vs garrett 250, fisher f2 vs garrett ace 250, fisher f4 x garret ace 250, garrett ace 250 of fisher f2, garrett ace 250 vs fisher f2
Click on a term to search for related topics.
|