A cure for cancer? Israeli scientists say they think they found one

DeepseekerADS

Gold Member
Mar 3, 2013
14,880
21,725
SW, VA - Bull Mountain
Detector(s) used
CTX, Excal II, EQ800, Fisher 1260X, Tesoro Royal Sabre, Tejon, Garrett ADSIII, Carrot, Stealth 920iX, Keene A52
Primary Interest:
Other
https://www.jpost.com/HEALTH-SCIENC...ientists-say-they-think-they-found-one-578939

“We believe we will offer in a year's time a complete cure for cancer."
By Maayan Jaffe-Hoffman
January 28, 2019 23:14

A small team of Israeli scientists think they might have found the first complete cure for cancer.

“We believe we will offer in a year’s time a complete cure for cancer,” said Dan Aridor, of a new treatment being developed by his company, Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies Ltd. (AEBi), which was founded in 2000 in the ITEK incubator in the Weizmann Science Park. AEBi developed the SoAP platform, which provides functional leads to very difficult targets.

“Our cancer cure will be effective from day one, will last a duration of a few weeks and will have no or minimal side-effects at a much lower cost than most other treatments on the market,” Aridor said. “Our solution will be both generic and personal.”

It sounds fantastical, especially considering that an estimated 18.1 million new cancer cases are diagnosed worldwide each year, according to reports by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Further, every sixth death in the world is due to cancer, making it the second leading cause of death (second only to cardiovascular disease).

Aridor, chairman of the board of AEBi and CEO Dr. Ilan Morad, say their treatment, which they call MuTaTo (multi-target toxin) is essentially on the scale of a cancer antibiotic – a disruption technology of the highest order.

The potentially game-changing anti-cancer drug is based on SoAP technology, which belongs to the phage display group of technologies. It involves the introduction of DNA coding for a protein, such as an antibody, into a bacteriophage – a virus that infects bacteria. That protein is then displayed on the surface of the phage. Researchers can use these protein-displaying phages to screen for interactions with other proteins, DNA sequences and small molecules.

In 2018, a team of scientists won the Nobel Prize for their work on phage display in the directed evolution of new proteins – in particular, for the production of antibody therapeutics.

AEBi is doing something similar but with peptides, compounds of two or more amino acids linked in a chain. According to Morad, peptides have several advantages over antibodies, including that they are smaller, cheaper, and easier to produce and regulate.

When the company first started, Morad said, “We were doing what everyone else was doing, trying to discover individual novel peptides for specific cancers.” But shortly thereafter, Morad and his colleague, Dr. Hanan Itzhaki, decided they wanted to do something bigger.

To get started, Morad said they had to identify why other cancer-killing drugs and treatments don’t work or eventually fail. Then, they found a way to counter that effect.

For starters, most anti-cancer drugs attack a specific target on or in the cancer cell, he explained. Inhibiting the target usually affects a physiological pathway that promotes cancer. Mutations in the targets – or downstream in their physiological pathways – could make the targets not relevant to the cancer nature of the cell, and hence the drug attacking it is rendered ineffective.

In contrast, MuTaTo is using a combination of several cancer-targeting peptides for each cancer cell at the same time, combined with a strong peptide toxin that would kill cancer cells specifically. By using at least three targeting peptides on the same structure with a strong toxin, Morad said, “we made sure that the treatment will not be affected by mutations; cancer cells can mutate in such a way that targeted receptors are dropped by the cancer.”

“The probability of having multiple mutations that would modify all targeted receptors simultaneously decreases dramatically with the number of targets used,” Morad continued. “Instead of attacking receptors one at a time, we attack receptors three at a time – not even cancer can mutate three receptors at the same time.”

Furthermore, many cancer cells activate detoxification mechanisms when in stress from drugs. The cells pump out the drugs or modify them to be non-functional. But Morad said detoxification takes time. When the toxin is strong, it has a high probability of killing the cancer cell before detoxification occurs, which is what he is banking on.

Many cytotoxic anticancer treatments aim at fast-growing cells. But cancer stem cells are not fast growing, and they can escape these treatments. Then, when the treatment is over, they can generate cancer again.

“If it does not completely annihilate the cancer, the remaining cells can start to get mutations again, and then the cancer comes back, but this time it is drug resistant,” Morad said.

He explained that because cancer cells are born out of mutations that occur in cancer stem cells, most of the overexpressed proteins which are targeted on the cancer cell exist in the cancer stem cells. MuTaTo’s multiple-target attack ensures that they will be destroyed as well.

Finally, some cancer tumors erect shields which create access problems to large molecules, such as antibodies. MuTaTo acts like an octopus or a piece of spaghetti and can sneak into places where other large molecules cannot reach. Morad said the peptide parts of MuTaTo are very small (12 amino acids long) and lack a rigid structure.

“This should make the whole molecule non-immunogenic in most cases and would enable repeated administration of the drug,” he said.

Morad said their discovery could also reduce the sickening side-effects of most cancer treatments, which stem from drug treatments interacting with the wrong or additional targets, or the correct targets but on non-cancerous cells. He said MuTaTo’s having a combination of several highly specific cancer-targeting peptides on one scaffold for each type of cancer cell would increase the specificity to the cancer cell due to the avidity effect. In addition, in most cases, the non-cancer cells that have a protein in common with the cancer cells do not overexpress it.

“This makes a great difference between the two kinds of cells and should decrease the side effects dramatically,” Morad said.

He equated the concept of MuTaTo to the triple drug cocktail that has helped change AIDS from being an automatic death sentence to a chronic – but often manageable – disease.

Today, AIDS patients take protease inhibitors in combination with two other drugs called reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The drug combination disrupts HIV at different stages in its replication, restrains an enzyme crucial to an early stage of HIV duplication and holds back another enzyme that functions near the end of the HIV replication process.

“We used to give AIDS patients several drugs, but we would administer them one at a time,” Morad explained. “During the course of treatment, the virus mutated, and the AIDS started attacking again. Only when patients started using a cocktail, were they able to stop the disease.”

Now, he said, people with AIDS are HIV carriers, but they are not sick anymore.

The MuTaTo cancer treatment will eventually be personalized. Each patient will provide a piece of his biopsy to the lab, which would then analyze it to know which receptors are overexpressed. The individual would then be administered exactly the molecule cocktail needed to cure his disease.

However, unlike in the case of AIDS, where patients must take the cocktail throughout their lives, in the case of MuTaTo, the cells would be killed, and the patient could likely stop treatment after only a few weeks.

The company is now writing patents on specific peptides, which will be a large bank of targeting toxin peptides wholly owned and hard to break, said Aridor.

Morad said that so far, the company has concluded its first exploratory mice experiment, which inhibited human cancer cell growth and had no effect at all on healthy mice cells, in addition to several in-vitro trials. AEBi is on the cusp of beginning a round of clinical trials which could be completed within a few years and would make the treatment available in specific cases.
Aridor added: “Our results are consistent and repeatable.”
 

Ammoman

Bronze Member
Oct 12, 2015
2,211
5,348
NC
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
XP Deus, Nokta Impact, Tesoro Compadre..
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I like it! For me, its not a matter of will i get Cancer, its when will it come back! I'm like....get your butts in gear and lets see some real results!
 

63bkpkr

Silver Member
Aug 9, 2007
4,069
4,618
Southern California
Detector(s) used
XLT, GMT, 6000D Coinmaster
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Their work provides some real hope for the future!

Right now for Cancer Tumors as well as Cysts a company in San Diego California, MedWaves Inc., has had a device on the market since late 2005 that kills Cancer Tumors in a few minutes & seals Cysts. It has been used in Europe and Asia and is in some hospitals in the U.S.A. Best place in the USA is Providence Hospital in Rhode Island. Dr. Damian E. Dupuy MD, in the Rhode Island area, has performed many operations using the Medwaves Device as well as with other types of Ablative devices.[h=3][/h]

The MedWaves product and procedure has proven effective without harming patients so now it is being used for previously Inoperable Tumors including in the human brain. I hope this helps someone!...............63bkpkr
 

Oddjob

Silver Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,348
9,067
Detector(s) used
RD1000, GSSI Profiler EMP-400. GPZ 14 & 19
Primary Interest:
Other
well at least we know why the Iron Dome will fail during the next rocket attack that will get blamed on,,,,, well,,,,, let see,,, blamed on who ever, just not big pharma deep pockets. LOL But it will be blamed on someone good enough to start the next war enough to distract folks.
 

Kray Gelder

Gold Member
Feb 24, 2017
7,013
12,578
Georgetown, SC
Detector(s) used
Fisher F75
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
The cure or vaccine is out there already. Jimmy Carter got it ( a loyal Globalist ) John McCain did not. When did the last President, European Union leader, British Pm or Royalty, Saudi leader, Israeli big shot, any CEO of the big multinationals ( the Apple guy pissed someone off ), CFR leader, etc., die of cancer? Seems odd to me.
 

Kray Gelder

Gold Member
Feb 24, 2017
7,013
12,578
Georgetown, SC
Detector(s) used
Fisher F75
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
I'm also of the opinion, cancer victims are pre-selected in many cases, based on their potential ability to pay. Good health insurance? Look out. The "health" industry is a wealth extraction and confiscation industry, license to steal. Enemies of the people.
 

Lunch Bag

Full Member
Dec 23, 2018
147
391
Coastal Georgia
Detector(s) used
XP DEUS
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
5 Billion spent each year on cancer research alone.

107 Billion in 2015 spent on cancer medicines. 150 Billion by 2020

God only knows how many people are employed in the cancer industry.

If they do actually find a cure, the unemployment rates will be astronomical.

It’s too profitable an industry to die.
 

piegrande

Bronze Member
May 16, 2010
1,125
739
Hitler was afraid of cancer, so he ordered the best doctors to find out what caused cancer and how to cure it. Dr. warburg, a Jewish :D doctor won the Nobel around 1931 for finding out. It is a sugar disease, i.e. glucose. Google Warburg effect and read all about it. As far as I know, only one experiment has been done. a few years ago, a German research group tried it. With 25 volunteers, not allowed to use the diet until the Oncologists declared them beyond help, they only saved 5 as opposed to 0 for conventional medicine for treating the terminal patients.
 

A2coins

Gold Member
Dec 20, 2015
33,807
42,606
Ann Arbor
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
The 2 Doctors who invented Cancell a drug that cured it had the same argument theres too much money in treatment they had a panel of people who were cured by this and 2 of 1 of them had a softball size tumor all these people had been cured If your familiar with the body Alcoline there is a level that the body can get to and a way to get there not to difficult and at this level cancer cannot survive in a body with that alcoline level. Theres also Leonord Caldwell who says any cancer can be cured in less than 2 weeks.
 

piegrande

Bronze Member
May 16, 2010
1,125
739
My personal goal is to keep my glucose level low enough I do not get cancer in the first place. The recommended diet in the US and Mexico is high carbs, which is perfect for cancer. There is no minimum daily requirement for carbs, though most doctors insist there is. The Innuit, I think it is, traditionally lived on zero carbs and could chase deer for 50 miles or more. In the last 20's, a European lived with them, and he was equally healthy on zero carbs.
 

piegrande

Bronze Member
May 16, 2010
1,125
739
Alternative for curing Cancer?

Where we’re you guys in 2015. :(

Warburg printed his discovery back before 1930, and Atkins Institute wrote on it before 2015.

Some people think doctors downplay things like Atkins and Warburg for money. I used to tell the Boy Scouts never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

I had two young people who wanted to go to medical school in my English classes. They were horrified when I told them most doctors I have known are idiots. :D

I explained to them medical schools only take the brightest and smartest, then turn them into idiots. For X years, they study and study and memorize and memorize, which is not the same as actually learning medicine stuff. And, everything they memorize has to be regurgitated on the exams, exactly so.

Then when they get their license, though they probably only really remember a small percentage of what they memorized in early med school years, they think they are real doctors, so stop learning. I told these two kids they need to understand when they get their license is when their learning must start, or they will be idiots like most other doctors.


So, that is why I say they take the brightest students and turn them into idiots.
 

flyadive

Bronze Member
Jun 11, 2012
2,192
1,535
NJ
Detector(s) used
Whites
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Warburg printed his discovery back before 1930, and Atkins Institute wrote on it before 2015.

Some people think doctors downplay things like Atkins and Warburg for money. I used to tell the Boy Scouts never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

I had two young people who wanted to go to medical school in my English classes. They were horrified when I told them most doctors I have known are idiots. :D

I explained to them medical schools only take the brightest and smartest, then turn them into idiots. For X years, they study and study and memorize and memorize, which is not the same as actually learning medicine stuff. And, everything they memorize has to be regurgitated on the exams, exactly so.

Then when they get their license, though they probably only really remember a small percentage of what they memorized in early med school years, they think they are real doctors, so stop learning. I told these two kids they need to understand when they get their license is when their learning must start, or they will be idiots like most other doctors.


So, that is why I say they take the brightest students and turn them into idiots add far as medicine is concerned .

I believe that 100 percent.
I always thought the same thing but nobody admits it.
Most people are text book smart and hands on stupid idiots!
 

Last edited:

piegrande

Bronze Member
May 16, 2010
1,125
739
I worked 31 years as a diagnostician in an electronic factory, except we called diagnosticians, troubleshooters. The principles of diagnosticians are the same in all fields, from auto mechanics to electronics to medicine. You need to know something about cars to diagnose car failures. You need to know something about electronics to diagnose electronics, and something about the human body and its illnesses to diagnose medical problems.

Our technicians essentially all had the same electronics school. But, when they came in, they knew nothing of diagnosing circuits. Some figured it out; others never did, and would replace parts at random until they fixed it. But, all diagnosticians in my experience only could get so good until they stopped and actually studied diagnostics as a special study. Then, they could advance further.

A medical student told me there is a name for too many doctors. They are said to suffer from a God Complex. They hear every day, "Doctor! Doctor! Save me!" And begin to think they are infallible. They are incapable of learning totally new concepts, or in the case of cancer and the Warburg effect, old concepts. And, they make lousy diagnosticians.

In the USA, the med association admits doctor errors kill 150,000 patients a year. And, the best doctors will tell you it's more like 750,000. Which is why I self-treat whenever it is possible.

There are good doctors out there, just not many. Cleveland Clinic; of course Mayo and Johns Hopkins, and Anderson in Houston. My son-in-law had a friend who got a wasting disease. He was slowly dying, and doctors he went to had no idea what was his problem. After 5 years someone convinced him to go to Anderson's in Houston. He entered the building and was struggling to walk to the receptionist. A young doctor came trotting up and asked what was his problem. He explained to the doctor who talked into his cell phone and several other doctors came hurrying out. They talked to him, and knew what his problem was right there, before he even talked to the receptionist.

The problem is most of us most of the time don't have access to these geniuses.
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top