When Ordinary Science Fails to Explain

[Ted Groves]

Ted... so happy to see you posting!!

I stop in far less frequently than I used to because I've found this forum to be exactly like a never-ending soap opera. Nothing on either "side" really changes, so I have found many other ways to spend my valuable time. Still, admittedly, I do enjoy the occasional jab at one or more of the self-appointed protectors of the G&T-C; and even that activity gives me less entertainment value than it once did.

However, I am glad to see there are a few who will daily stand up to the prevaricators of LRL fraudulent and scam devices and related business operations. Though your efforts will never change the devoted scam artists (and their tiny group of followers), at least the occasional newcomer to the group will get a healthy dose of reality, and probably (in most cases), see the scam for exactly what it is. Of course, those that don't see the scam, must count themselves among the ranks of the G&T-C. - and there will always be a certain tiny percentage of those unfortunates.

[Ads]

TreasureNet.com is the premier Treasure Hunting Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI JUDY, PBSRW #1, Eddie and my friends: I see that the sceptics certainly are not up on the latest scientific findings -->

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...ing-****-in-3D

No wonder they can't find or understand the subtleties of LRL'S and dowsing, they still think of thingies such as cigars. snicker.

Don Jose de la Mancha
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



p.s. I beieve that this was a typical sceptic's story prob. a phoney since it couldn't be verified, buttttt

[werleibr]

HI JUDY, PBSRW #1, Eddie and my friends: I see that the sceptics certainly are not up on the latest scientific findings -->

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...ing-****-in-3D

No wonder they can't find or understand the subtleties of LRL'S and dowsing, they still think of thingies such as cigars. snicker.

Don Jose de la Mancha
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



p.s. I beieve that this was a typical sceptic's story prob. a phoney since it couldn't be verified, buttttt

Wow cannot beleive you acutally beleived that post!!!! Way to actually "read the advertisement." Story is from May 6, 2010. And guess what. IT WAS A FAKE STORY. Here is a quote from the editor of the sight.

Editor’s Update : “As far fetched as it seems this came from a reputable source. it would, however seem that it is a fabrication. PopJolly staff were unable to validate the source after repeated attempts. The good folks at Gizmodo have clarified the story now. We got onioned . Sorry, move on! ”

They got fooled by the Onion as did you.

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI war lover: I believe that I mentioned that I presumed that it was false, but suggested that gentleman in question undubtedly was a sceptic he hehehheheh

Don Jose de La Mancha

[werleibr]

HI war lover: I believe that I mentioned that I presumed that it was false, but suggested that gentleman in question undubtedly was a sceptic he hehehheheh

Don Jose de La Mancha

Actually you claimed it as a skeptics story. You kind of contradict yourself.. You claim that skeptics are not up on latest scientivic finding. There was nothing scientific in the article or about the article. Just a claim. Much like what is done on this LRL forum. SO it was more acting like an LRL promoter, not a skeptic. Then you go to say

beieve that this was a typical sceptic's story prob. a phoney since it couldn't be verified, buttttt

Yes you say it is probably phony, but then you have an uneasyness with it. Also again you claim it as a skeptic's story. This isn't a skeptics story.

[werleibr]

Sorry, Werl.....but how do you know with such certainty that the author is not a skeptic??

Did you even read the article?

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

War lover, why such a preoccupation with the semantics of the post? They can easily be shown to be in the position of a tongue in cheek post and an attempt to post a bit of humor, rather than a flat, humorless one?

Don Jose de La Mancha

[werleibr]

because of people like art who will take it to hart and acutally beleive it.

[aarthrj3811]

~werleibr~

because of people like art who will take it to hart and acutally beleive it.

Just maybe you should worry about what you believe and not what I know...Art

[EE THr]

Their obsession with my cigar as a symbol for a males sexual organ,...

I mentioned that your cigar and the man-cave furniture didn't seem to go with your dress and nylons.

You are the one who is relating the cigar to that male body part, so the obsession appears to be yours, and yours alone.

Maybe you would get better responses on a dating forum---you admittedly don't know anything about LRLs anyway?

[EE THr]

Sure ya did, Darling.

You asking me out?

(snicker)

I seem to get an awful lot of responses from you guys already.
Of course, you could always try to prove me wrong.

I never mentioned anything like that. Must be another one of your obsessions? Or is it just another manifestation of the first one?

[EE THr]

RealDeal has personal knowledge that this is in fact untrue,...

So you are claiming to have met with RDT in person, and actually shown him your, um, evidence?

Or are you merely referring to the Internet photos which you have posted?

[werleibr]

Real posted that he thinks it only may be a fabrication. But he was also trying. To pass it as though it were a possibility. He has been on here defending the "theory" of lrls. It is nice to see u defending real so much and knowing all he ment in his post. I think the guy can defend him self. Unless u know more about real than everyone else does. Like u said about me...did I know the author to say they were not skeptical. I don't need to. It was a fake stoey, and most authors that wright about a thing they are skeptikal about they will say so in one form or another.

[EE THr]

RealDeal has personal knowledge that this is in fact untrue,...

So you are claiming to have met with RDT in person, and actually shown him your, um, evidence?

Or are you merely referring to the Internet photos which you have posted?

Gettin' hot just thinking about it, aren't you Darling?

Down, boy.

Just as I thought.


As usual with LRL promoters, it turns out that your the one whose got "nuthin'."

[EE THr]

You're so cute when you're frustrated.

Typical nonsensical answer of an LRL promoter, as predicted seven months ago, and proven to be reliable ever since. See #22 in the link below.

ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?



Keep up the good work---you are your own best skeptic!

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HIO EE, you posted ->I mentioned that your cigar and the man-cave furniture didn't seem to go with your dress and nylons.
***************
I believe that it is ted who keeps bringing up the cigar incident ?? Now you ? Poor Monica.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
you posted --> You are the one who is relating the cigar to that male body part, so the obsession appears to be yours, and yours alone.
**************
Is THAT your physiological measurement ? A cigar ? Hmmmm.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You posted ->Maybe you would get better responses on a dating forum---you admittedly don't know anything about LRLs anyway
***********
As a matter of fact, that knowledge is very scarce in here as shown by the sceptics, and the possible theories are simply not understood by them either, They keep getting lemons mixed with grapefruit.

As for a dating forum, sigh I should be so lucky as to spend an evening with Judy in front of a nice large fire with candlelight / wine & good music, discussing, as I said before, everything from Aardvarks to Zippers. Life can be beautiful ! sigh.

Don Jose de La Mancha

[EE THr]

HIO EE, you posted ->I mentioned that your cigar and the man-cave furniture didn't seem to go with your dress and nylons.
***************
I believe that it is ted who keeps bringing up the cigar incident ?? Now you ? Poor Monica.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
you posted --> You are the one who is relating the cigar to that male body part, so the obsession appears to be yours, and yours alone.
**************
Is THAT your physiological measurement ? A cigar ? Hmmmm.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You posted ->Maybe you would get better responses on a dating forum---you admittedly don't know anything about LRLs anyway
***********
As a matter of fact, that knowledge is very scarce in here as shown by the sceptics, and the possible theories are simply not understood by them either, They keep getting lemons mixed with grapefruit.

As for a dating forum, sigh I should be so lucky as to spend an evening with Judy in front of a nice large fire with candlelight / wine & good music, discussing, as I said before, everything from Aardvarks to Zippers. Life can be beautiful ! sigh.

Don Jose de La Mancha

It looks like you've finally completed your journey to the dark side. You have now joined the ranks of "Innocent Eddie."

Good luck.

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI Eddie, move over.

Don Jose de La Mancha

[EE THr]

HI Eddie, move over.

Don Jose de La Mancha

RDT---

Now you've done it---Your mule is going to get jelous!

Hope that trailer's not a-rockin' when I'm around---ugh.

[EddieR]

HI Eddie, move over.

Don Jose de La Mancha

Come on up!! It's fun to be up here where we can look down upon them.