Welcome guest, is this your first visit?
Member
Discoveries
 
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 194
  1. #1
    us
    Feb 2010
    Aurora Aqua, Excalibur, Garrett CX2, Gemini-3, MFD's, Sovereign, Viper, E Trac, Dees Nutz rod, Tesoro Sand Shark. Pro pulse.
    839
    39 times

    QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Well lets see if we can clear up the mystery of some of these posts.

    After countless demands and even more meaningless and unimportant questions from the naysayers let's see what they seem

    afraid to clarify.

    1) Since you do not have hours of experience, why do you ask questions that you cannot comprehend the answers?

    2) When you get an response, why do you object to the answer?

    3) Why do you believe your opinion is all important?

    4) What gives you the right to call people liars based on your "opinion"?

    5) Why are you afraid to try the Sho-Nuff experiment or any others presented here?

    6) Why do you not post photos of ANYTHING you have found with any device?

    7) Why are the same questions asked over and over after a response has been given?

    I could make a guess on the responses to this, but I will refrain.

  2. #2
    Kentucky Kache

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    My question is, why are they allowed to pester other people every time a post is made?

  3. #3

    May 2008
    Nanaimo, B.C. Canada
    White's 4900 DL Max, Tesoro Deleon
    1,374
    6 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER


    In the Howard Stern documentary, there was a part where they asked the people who liked him why they listened to his show.
    They generally said, to see what he would say next.

    The people who didn't like him were asked the same question. The response was the same. To see what he would say next.


    The LRL'ers have many places where they could go and have censorship in their favor, some even here on Tnet, but they don't go there.

    They continue to come right here where the skeptics are, knowing what response they will get.


    Why would that be ?

  4. #4
    Kentucky Kache

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Quote Originally Posted by Saturna

    In the Howard Stern documentary, there was a part where they asked the people who liked him why they listened to his show.
    They generally said, to see what he would say next.

    The people who didn't like him were asked the same question. The response was the same. To see what he would say next.


    The LRL'ers have many places where they could go and have censorship in their favor, some even here on Tnet, but they don't go there.

    They continue to come right here where the skeptics are, knowing what response they will get.


    Why would that be ?
    Why do they come to the LRL board to discuss LRL'S? Is that a serious question?
    And I don't think the stopping of people pestering would be censorship. Two different things when it gets to the point of pestering.

  5. #5

    May 2008
    Nanaimo, B.C. Canada
    White's 4900 DL Max, Tesoro Deleon
    1,374
    6 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER


    Oh, you can certainly come here to discuss LRL's, but if you want to do it without anyone questioning anything, this isn't that place.
    There ARE places like that right here, such as personal pages, but they don't go there, yet claim they don't like the skeptic comments.

    I'll bet that if a new policy of not being allowed to question anything here was introduced, this forum would dry right up.
    There would be a few posts made about finding tons of gold because someone got a new secret frequency, or some such, but for the most part, this forum would wither.

    Where would Arthur spend all his time ?

  6. #6
    Kentucky Kache

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Quote Originally Posted by Saturna

    Oh, you can certainly come here to discuss LRL's, but if you want to do it without anyone questioning anything, this isn't that place.
    There ARE places like that right here, such as personal pages, but they don't go there, yet claim they don't like the skeptic comments.

    I'll bet that if a new policy of not being allowed to question anything here was introduced, this forum would dry right up.
    There would be a few posts made about finding tons of gold because someone got a new secret frequency, or some such, but for the most part, this forum would wither.

    Where would Arthur spend all his time ?
    I think you've got two issues confused. And this is what happens every time a post is made here. No one said anything about being allowed to question anything. But when you've done that, you need to leave it alone. When you don't leave it alone, it becomes pestering.

    Actually, I think some people could have a good discussion of LRLS if not for the pestering. But I guess you've shown why you guys like to do that, as you said without it things would dry up.

  7. #7
    us
    The Watcher

    Apr 2004
    Northern Nevada
    Dowsing Rods and a Ranger Tell Examiner
    9,286
    1062 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    ~Saturna~
    The LRL'ers have many places where they could go and have censorship in their favor, some even here on Tnet, but they don't go there.
    Could be that this is a Treasure Hunting web site.. Open discussion of a wide variety of topics, including, treasure hunting, metal detecting, prospecting, cache hunting, relic hunting - even antique hunting and garage-saling. A great place to meet other treasure hunters!
    I do post on other Treasure Hunting sites.. http://www.thunting.com/..the skeptics over there let us discuss LRL’s and Dowsing with them. We do not get the constant insults and harassment that we get here. You may want to go there so you would understand how people should be treated…This site is my preferred site to pass on the information. It has a lot larger group of treasure hunters..Art

  8. #8
    us
    Apr 2008
    Central California
    4,016
    24 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Quote Originally Posted by Kentucky Kache
    My question is, why are they allowed to pester other people every time a post is made?
    You'll notice on the main LRL page, it says it's to discuss these devices.

    But the LRL promoters on here feel that they must go off-topic, and make claims about their personal activities which they never have, and never can, prove. They also feel it necessary to make derogatory remarks about people, even though "people" are not the topic. They will do anything to disrupt the discussion of LRL devices. So they are the ones who are pestering, not us.

    When we ask them a simple question about an LRL device, like for instance, "Will the pointer follow a moving target if the handle is held still and level in a vise?"

    First they say they something like, they won't answer because it isn't important. Then they insult us by saying we are too stupid to understand LRLs. And when they finally do admit that the pointer won't move on it's own, and we say, "Well, then how can it be electronically controlled?" And point out the fact that it's just a dowsing device, they say, "Oh no, it's all electronic." So, when we then show them that what they have just said is self-contradicting, and makes no sense, they say we are insulting them.

    If you read the first dozen or so topics, you will see that the insults always start from the LRL promoters.

    There is a whole list of their shenanigans at the top if this topic page. If you think you see them doing anything other than what's listed there, please let me know, because it will be a first!
    An evil group is comprised of the insane, who, out of fear, imagine that they must conspire to destroy those who are honest and able. A good group is made up of honest people, who could each survive on their own, yet work together openly for betterment for themselves and others.

  9. #9
    us
    Apr 2008
    Central California
    4,016
    24 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Quote Originally Posted by fenixdigger
    Well lets see if we can clear up the mystery of some of these posts.

    After countless demands and even more meaningless and unimportant questions from the naysayers let's see what they seem

    afraid to clarify.

    1) Since you do not have hours of experience, why do you ask questions that you cannot comprehend the answers?

    2) When you get an response, why do you object to the answer?

    3) Why do you believe your opinion is all important?

    4) What gives you the right to call people liars based on your "opinion"?

    5) Why are you afraid to try the Sho-Nuff experiment or any others presented here?

    6) Why do you not post photos of ANYTHING you have found with any device?

    7) Why are the same questions asked over and over after a response has been given?

    I could make a guess on the responses to this, but I will refrain.

    All of your questions are #32s, on the bottom link.

    Not even a nice try.



    Don't be a doof---show the proof!
    P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
    ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
    An evil group is comprised of the insane, who, out of fear, imagine that they must conspire to destroy those who are honest and able. A good group is made up of honest people, who could each survive on their own, yet work together openly for betterment for themselves and others.

  10. #10
    us
    Apr 2008
    Central California
    4,016
    24 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Quote Originally Posted by aarthrj3811
    ~Saturna~
    The LRL'ers have many places where they could go and have censorship in their favor, some even here on Tnet, but they don't go there.
    Could be that this is a Treasure Hunting web site.. Open discussion of a wide variety of topics, including, treasure hunting, metal detecting, prospecting, cache hunting, relic hunting - even antique hunting and garage-saling. A great place to meet other treasure hunters!
    I do post on other Treasure Hunting sites.. http://www.thunting.com/..the skeptics over there let us discuss LRL’s and Dowsing with them. We do not get the constant insults and harassment that we get here. You may want to go there so you would understand how people should be treated…This site is my preferred site to pass on the information. It has a lot larger group of treasure hunters..Art

    But the LRL section is for the discussion of the devices.

    When you go off-topic, and start making promotional claims about your personal activities, and the personal activities of others, we will simply ask for proof of your claims.

    Only a Con Artist considers asking for proof to be an insult. And you always consider it to be an insult.

    Anyone can put two and two together on that one. It's not an opinion, it's obvious facts.



    Don't be a doof---show the proof!
    P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
    ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
    An evil group is comprised of the insane, who, out of fear, imagine that they must conspire to destroy those who are honest and able. A good group is made up of honest people, who could each survive on their own, yet work together openly for betterment for themselves and others.

  11. #11
    Kentucky Kache

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Quote Originally Posted by EE THr
    Quote Originally Posted by Kentucky Kache
    My question is, why are they allowed to pester other people every time a post is made?
    You'll notice on the main LRL page, it says it's to discuss these devices.

    But the LRL promoters on here feel that they must go off-topic, and make claims about their personal activities which they never have, and never can, prove.
    So what if you're right. Do your victory dance and move on. Let other people do what they do.

    Quote Originally Posted by EE THr
    They also feel it necessary to make derogatory remarks about people, even though "people" are not the topic.
    Excuse me, but you're just a tad off on that statement. If you guys would leave them alone, the LRL users would have no reason to mention you. You're not being 100% honest here, and that's what you accuse others of.


    Quote Originally Posted by EE THr
    They will do anything to disrupt the discussion of LRL devices. So they are the ones who are pestering, not us.
    All the more reason to leave them alone. Why won't you do that?


    Quote Originally Posted by EE THr
    When we ask them a simple question about an LRL device, like for instance, "Will the pointer follow a moving target if the handle is held still and level in a vise?"

    First they say they something like, they won't answer because it isn't important. Then they insult us by saying we are too stupid to understand LRLs. And when they finally do admit that the pointer won't move on it's own, and we say, "Well, then how can it be electronically controlled?" And point out the fact that it's just a dowsing device, they say, "Oh no, it's all electronic." So, when we then show them that what they have just said is self-contradicting, and makes no sense, they say we are insulting them.
    Liked I said, if you've been proven to be right about the subject, then move on. The way you guys act, I don't think you're convinced of your "victory."


    Quote Originally Posted by EE THr
    If you read the first dozen or so topics, you will see that the insults always start from the LRL promoters.
    Again, you need to be more honest.


    Quote Originally Posted by EE THr
    There is a whole list of their shenanigans at the top if this topic page. If you think you see them doing anything other than what's listed there, please let me know, because it will be a first!
    Oh, I've seen a lot of the posts. Been involved in a lot of them. I stand by what I say.

  12. #12

    May 2008
    Nanaimo, B.C. Canada
    White's 4900 DL Max, Tesoro Deleon
    1,374
    6 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER



    Quote Originally Posted by Kentucky Kache
    Actually, I think some people could have a good discussion of LRLS if not for the pestering. But I guess you've shown why you guys like to do that, as you said without it things would dry up.

    Those people could have a good discussion without 'pestering' by going to areas that only allow pro-LRL talk OR they could even stay on THIS forum and put those they don't like on Ignore and have their discussion.

    But they don't. They continue to interact with the same skeptics who apparently bother them so much, despite not having to do so.


    Maybe they secretly like the abuse.

  13. #13
    Kentucky Kache

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Quote Originally Posted by Saturna

    Quote Originally Posted by Kentucky Kache
    Actually, I think some people could have a good discussion of LRLS if not for the pestering. But I guess you've shown why you guys like to do that, as you said without it things would dry up.
    Those people could have a good discussion without 'pestering' by going to areas that only allow pro-LRL talk OR they could even stay on THIS forum and put those they don't like on Ignore and have their discussion.

    But they don't. They continue to interact with the same skeptics who apparently bother them so much, despite not having to do so.


    Maybe they secretly like the abuse.
    Why should they have to do any of that? I for one would like to see people be able to discuss what they want to discuss without the constant needling and childishness. If you've proved your case, move on. Could you imagine an attorney who just won his case continuing his courtroom antics? Me neither. That's why I think you're not convinced you are the victors. Really, what do you get out of this?


  14. #14
    us
    The Watcher

    Apr 2004
    Northern Nevada
    Dowsing Rods and a Ranger Tell Examiner
    9,286
    1062 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

    Hey Lt and KK..Did you notice their last few posts..They can’t resist spinning and twisting even if it is their own post..Art

  15. #15

    May 2008
    Nanaimo, B.C. Canada
    White's 4900 DL Max, Tesoro Deleon
    1,374
    6 times

    Re: QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER


    It's just entertainment. I get a kick out of all the regular posters, not just the skeptical ones.


    These topics aren't really 'dis-provable' (although they are provable if something did actually work), so I could never really claim to be a 'victor'.


    Actually considering how frivolous some lawsuits are, and how the lawyers keep appealing even after they 'lose', your comparison may be more apt than you think.



 

 
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast

Remove Ads

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

anderson rods long range locators

,

arthur's long range locator

,

lrls professional circuit

Click on a term to search for related topics.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.3.0