I say LRLs are fraudulent, so wheres my Chuckiegram?

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

`woof~

G'mornin', Troutfisher. Actually, threats are cheap, just a few minutes of Chuckie's time. The problem with Chuckie's threats was that they made him look real stupid, which even he eventually figured out.

--Toto
I think that you are over estimating the importance of Skeptics..Art

Youy're right, Art. The problem is that there are no "skeptics" posting on here. We all know for certain that there is no such thing as an "LRL."

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

~EE~

Youy're right, Art.

I know that

The problem is that there are no "skeptics" posting on here.

Another wild claim

We all know for certain that there is no such thing as an "LRL."

Just what do you call these devices?

 

[woof!]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Gravity sensors. With just a smidgin of tilt, they'll locate a large mass of iron about 4,000 miles deep. That makes 'em LRL's.

Compasses are designed to eliminate sensitivity to gravity so that they can be used to detect a field other than that of gravity. No swingy thingy LRL is designed to eliminate gravitational influence because if you do that, then the sucker won't work.

The question of what a human being might somehow detect and use a gravitator to indicate the position of, is a dowsing question, and LRL proponents refuse to go there. Thus is the fraud of the supposed electronic LRL stuff exposed.

--Toto

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

~woof~

That makes 'em LRL's.

Thank you..See EE..LRL’s do exist...Art

 

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

~woof~

That makes 'em LRL's.

Thank you..See EE..LRL’s do exist...Art

No, Art, those are not Long Range Locators. They are NRFs. No Range Frauds.








Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?

Don't be a doof---show the proof!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?

A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.

 

[Carl-NC]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Maybe its that none of those consider you and your opinions worthy of their efforts. Could it be that you are not as important as you think?

If you cain't shoot the message...

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Maybe its that none of those consider you and your opinions worthy of their efforts. Could it be that you are not as important as you think?

If you cain't shoot the message...

Oh but I CAN shoot the message. I DID.

 

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Oh but I CAN shoot the message. I DID.

You shot the Chuckiegram?

So that's why it never showed up!

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Oh but I CAN shoot the message. I DID.

You shot the Chuckiegram?

So that's why it never showed up!

So Toto is what everyone is calling a Chuckiegram? Well then, I guess I did.

 

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

JH---

I could be wrong, but since Toto's post came after a particular line of similar discussion, I think it might be related it that.

The subject matter was as follows: Art asked why no LRL manufacturer has been sued, implying that is a reason to believe that LRLs work. One of my replies was to ask why no LRL debunker has been sued by a manufacturer.

And then came Woof!'s original post of this thread, talking about threats of suits.

The LRL promoters, rather than discussing the merits of his post, turned, as usual to personal attacks, like the one in your last quote.

You have taken up the Straw Man diversion, and gone off into the wild blue yonder with it, again as usual.

Do you have any intentions of ever posting to the actual subject of discussion?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

JH---

I could be wrong, but since Toto's post came after a particular line of similar discussion, I think it might be related it that.

The subject matter was as follows: Art asked why no LRL manufacturer has been sued, implying that is a reason to believe that LRLs work. One of my replies was to ask why no LRL debunker has been sued by a manufacturer.

And then came Woof!'s original post of this thread, talking about threats of suits.

The LRL promoters, rather than discussing the merits of his post, turned, as usual to personal attacks, like the one in your last quote.

You have taken up the Straw Man diversion, and gone off into the wild blue yonder with it, again as usual.

Do you have any intentions of ever posting to the actual subject of discussion?

A typical response from someone who don't know what to say. You are so transparent.

 

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

A typical response from someone who don't know what to say. You are so transparent.

When a person has no actual facts to back up his position about a subject, he will stoop to casting mere insults, rather than any real data to try and prove his point.

Insults are just another type of Straw Man Fallacy, designed to evoke an emotional response, and thus divert attention away from the obvious fact that he is wrong.

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

JH---

I could be wrong, but since Toto's post came after a particular line of similar discussion, I think it might be related it that.

The subject matter was as follows: Art asked why no LRL manufacturer has been sued, implying that is a reason to believe that LRLs work. One of my replies was to ask why no LRL debunker has been sued by a manufacturer.

And then came Woof!'s original post of this thread, talking about threats of suits.

The LRL promoters, rather than discussing the merits of his post, turned, as usual to personal attacks, like the one in your last quote.

You have taken up the Straw Man diversion, and gone off into the wild blue yonder with it, again as usual.

Do you have any intentions of ever posting to the actual subject of discussion?

A typical response from someone who don't know what to say. You are so transparent.

Actually, KK.....I believe EE was trying to take credit for Toto's posting of this thread.

Typical.

Everything has to be about EE......

After all, One IS the loneliest number.

Yeah, that's why I say these tirades from them are not about LRL's, but about themselves.

A typical response from someone who don't know what to say. You are so transparent.

When a person has no actual facts to back up his position about a subject, he will stoop to casting mere insults, rather than any real data to try and prove his point.

Yes, that's pretty much what I said.

 

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Actually, KK.....I believe EE was trying to take credit for Toto's posting of this thread.

Typical.

Everything has to be about EE......

After all, One IS the loneliest number.

Thanks for proving my point, again.



P.S.

I didn't think you had an answer.

The LRL promoters, rather than discussing the merits of his post, turned, as usual to personal attacks, like the one in your last quote.

You have taken up the Straw Man diversion, and gone off into the wild blue yonder with it, again as usual.

Do you have any intentions of ever posting to the actual subject of discussion?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

This is what they do when they get stumped. They talk about strawmen and catfish.

 

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Kentucky Kry Baby---

Looks like you can't take what you dish out, huh?

Maybe its that none of those consider you and your opinions worthy of their efforts. Could it be that you are not as important as you think?

You started with nothing to back up your position of the subject.

And you still have nothing.

And you just keep on proving that.

So keep up the good work!






P.S. I figured the Straw Man thing would be over your head, because it relates to logic. Don't bother clicking on the link, you obviously won't understand it anyway.

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

Kentucky Kry Baby---

Looks like you can't take what you dish out, huh?

Maybe its that none of those consider you and your opinions worthy of their efforts. Could it be that you are not as important as you think?

You started with nothing to back up your position of the subject.

And you still have nothing.

And you just keep on proving that.

So keep up the good work!






P.S. I figured the Straw Man thing would be over your head, because it relates to logic. Don't bother clicking on the link, you obviously won't understand it anyway.

My statement that you quoted is logical, and it explains what I believe to be the answer to why no one ever "bothered" Toto for his stand against them. Think about it. Steve Jobs vs. Bill Gates, you couldn't expect one side to be a no show. Toto against an LRL company? Are you willing to make that comparison? I also told Toto to not feel so bad about not being so important, because we are all small in the grand scheme. I guess you accidentally overlooked that part. Then again, maybe it just went over your head.

I'm glad you don't stoop so low as to call people names. You know, like kry baby.

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

This is what they do when they get stumped. They talk about strawmen and catfish.

.....and Pole Dance.

If we started a thread about a strawman watching a pole dance while eating catfish, we'd never get rid of these guys.

 

[EE THr]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

This is what they do when they get stumped. They talk about strawmen and catfish.

.....and Pole Dance.

If we started a thread about a strawman watching a pole dance while eating catfish, we'd never get rid of these guys.

You didn't start this thread, you're just here to try and mess it up with your nonsense. (Duh!)






Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?

Don't be a doof---show the proof!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?

A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Re: I say LRL's are fraudulent, so where's my Chuckiegram?

This is what they do when they get stumped. They talk about strawmen and catfish.

.....and Pole Dance.

If we started a thread about a strawman watching a pole dance while eating catfish, we'd never get rid of these guys.

You didn't start this thread, you're just here to try and mess it up with your nonsense. (Duh!)






Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?

Don't be a doof---show the proof!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?

A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.

I know this is a big word for you, but I said "IF." IF we started a thread...
Over your head.