Shambler said:Thanks Tom!
I always have my ear to the ground for a detector that will do well in heavy iron. I'm less interested in the 2D tests (IE. nail resting on the coin) and more interested in a 3D test where the coin is under an overturned cup with the nail resting on the bottom of that cup. Since I'm digging all non-ferrous targets within about 6", TID and depth are largely unimportant. I'm looking for fast recovery with minimal falsing on bent and square nails.
I thought the F75 was going to be the one, but it was slower than my Explorer because I had to investigate so many falses. A non-ferrous target amongst nails sound identical to falsing. Even thought the Explorer is hella slow at recovery, the falsing is a lot less.
If you had to pick one of those (sabre or shadow) which would you go to?
Shambler said:Unfortunately, the amount of iron in places I'm talking about create situations where you can sometimes SEE a coin on the ground and my Explorer II and my buddies Explorer XS get no signal - even in ferrous. I'll try to capture some video this fall and post it. If you can see it on the ground and get no signal, imagine what's below the surface....
Ferrous is no extra advantage over conductive
Shambler said:Ferrous is no extra advantage over conductive
?? Geez - you can prove that wrong in a 3 minute test. The Explorer is terrible at recovering from a null, but seems fairly quick from sound to sound. Running ferrous tones and a wide open screen eliminates whatever the heck it's doing during the null process.
We're also hunting 1850's home sites and although they are no longer being deep-plowed they are planted and harvested each year.
Shambler said:I was being generous with the 3 minutes since it sounded like you were too slow to recognize that the Explorer BLOWS at recovering form a null.
You can't hunt a wide open screen in heavy iron in conductive tones unless you ignore all high tones. While you'd be sure to get a few buttons and maybe a nickel coin, you'd leave all silver and copper coins behind. To me, when someone says, "I use ferrous" I assume they are using a wide open screen or possibly some lower right masking.
While I believe experience helps in this hobby, it doesn't change the detectors' limitations.
I used to argue with people like you my first few years but have not done much of it in my last seven because I have nothing to prove.
Shambler said:Thanks Tom!
I always have my ear to the ground for a detector that will do well in heavy iron. I'm less interested in the 2D tests (IE. nail resting on the coin) and more interested in a 3D test where the coin is under an overturned cup with the nail resting on the bottom of that cup. Since I'm digging all non-ferrous targets within about 6", TID and depth are largely unimportant. I'm looking for fast recovery with minimal falsing on bent and square nails.
I thought the F75 was going to be the one, but it was slower than my Explorer because I had to investigate so many falses. A non-ferrous target amongst nails sound identical to falsing. Even thought the Explorer is hella slow at recovery, the falsing is a lot less.
If you had to pick one of those (sabre or shadow) which would you go to?