Thinking of Detector Upgrade - Some observations about Detector owners

Normsel

Bronze Member
Sep 10, 2012
1,191
813
D'Iberville MS
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
E-Trac
Equinox 800
Equinox 600
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
I am thinking of up-grading from my Ace 250 to a mid level Detector. Looking at AT PRO or similar. Anyway I have read lots of forums and comparisons of detectors. What I think I have gleaned from the different posts is the kind of detector is more of what is personal preference and skill level with the detector of choice. I have been detecting daily for about 3 months now and even with my ACE 250 I rarely dig tabs or cans. It takes a combination of the nickel sound and a quick glance at the screen to decide whether to dig or not to dig. I test my observations often to make sure what I think is trash really is and in the past two days I have plucked 35 nickels.

From what I have read there are many long time detectorists on here and each guy has his own preference. I have watched side by side tests on many detectors and more often than not the detector that fails is not the guy doing the test his favorite. So what I am seeing is you get what you pay for and without much detail I have had two owners of detector stores recommend the same detector as the next one to move up to.

I think ground balance would be one of the most important features. My ACE 25O acts different in different soils and i pick up on it quickly so I have to pay more attention to what it tells me.

So I am actually torn on which detector to up-grade to. I am looking at Garrett, Fisher, Minelab and Whites and not counting out the others either. It's like trying to pick one desert when you have a choice of 50 but can only have one. Trying to get the best bang for my buck in the $600 range.

So as usual I did a whole lot of blabbing without saying much. I am wondering if others feel if most detectors in a price range perform about the same and it's more choice of brand.
 

Upvote 0

kayden

Bronze Member
Apr 24, 2011
1,331
229
Pennsylvania
Detector(s) used
Ace250,AT Pro & Garrett Propointer!
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
My 2 cents!...I had an ace250 also & upgraded to an At Pro ....I looked at others but what sold me is the water proof AT Pro...I love it .. Im not saying its the best out there but if I had to do it over again.....I would not change my choice!!
 

sonofadigger

Bronze Member
Apr 22, 2012
2,201
783
SOMEWHERE
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
MINELAB E-TRAC MINELAB SAFARI TEKNETICS OMEGA 8000 GARRETT AT PRO GARRETT PRO POINTER VIBRA PROBE 580
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
cant go wrong with the AT PRO its an amazing machine
 

Terry Soloman

Gold Member
May 28, 2010
19,410
30,022
White Plains, New York
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Makro Legend// Pulsedive// Minelab GPZ 7000// Vanquish 540// Minelab Pro Find 35// Dune Kraken Sandscoop// Grave Digger Tools Tombstone shovel & Sidekick digger// Bunk's Hermit Pick
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting

DirtDiggerDaveinMD

Hero Member
Jan 31, 2005
638
730
Whatever detector you decide on getting, do not focus on depth as the main deciding factor. Discrimination, audio, separation/ recovery speed and threshold all play very important parts of the experience. The ability to adjust these attributes as well and an adjustable ground balance will make for a better detector.
 

Jeremy S

Hero Member
Feb 27, 2012
515
343
God's Country
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
Garret Ace 250, AT Pro, Garret Pro Pointer
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
If you are very familiar and good with your 250, then upgrading to the AT Pro will be pretty easy. It took me months to figure out my 250 as it was my first detector ever, but maybe a day to really learn the Pro. Sure, I've already noticed the the AT Pro can get slightly better depth, but I like it more for its other features.

There are a lot of good machines out there to choose from, you won't go wrong with any of them. Do you have a local detector store where you can go demo some of these?
 

sonofadigger

Bronze Member
Apr 22, 2012
2,201
783
SOMEWHERE
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
MINELAB E-TRAC MINELAB SAFARI TEKNETICS OMEGA 8000 GARRETT AT PRO GARRETT PRO POINTER VIBRA PROBE 580
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
If you are very familiar and good with your 250, then upgrading to the AT Pro will be pretty easy. It took me months to figure out my 250 as it was my first detector ever, but maybe a day to really learn the Pro. Sure, I've already noticed the the AT Pro can get slightly better depth, but I like it more for its other features.

There are a lot of good machines out there to choose from, you won't go wrong with any of them. Do you have a local detector store where you can go demo some of these?

it gets alot more depth than slightly vs the ace 250
 

Jason in Enid

Gold Member
Oct 10, 2009
9,593
9,229
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Just like you have discovered, you pretty much get what you pay for, and everyone has their favorites. I like your desert analogy, and it's very appropriate. I think if you pick a midrange detector from any of the companies you listed, that you can't go wrong. The biggest challenge is to pick one and not keep wondering, "what if". Just like picking the peach cobbler desert, and then thinking, "but I like cheesecake too." They're both good!
 

Dwight S

Hero Member
Apr 26, 2010
558
70
NC
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT-Pro & White's TDI & Tesoro Compass uMax
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
You have to think about what your intentions are. Are you going to hunt only on dry land, or do you want to hunt in the water too? (Including rain) Are you comfortable with lots of settings or do you want simple to use? What kind of ground conditions will you be detecting in? Good soil or highly mineralized? Do you want tone ID? Do you want VID? Coil selection...

Research, research, research. Ask lots of questions. It comes down to more than just price, it comes down to all of the above plus more I've overlooked AND price.
 

TerryC

Gold Member
Jun 26, 2008
7,732
10,991
Yarnell, AZ
Detector(s) used
Ace 250 (2), Ace 300, Gold Bug 2, Tesoro Cortes, Garrett Sea Hunter, Whites TDI SL SE, Fisher Impulse 8, Minelab Monster 1000, Minelab CTX3030, Falcon MD20, Garrett Pro-pointer, Calvin Bunker digger.
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Don't just take the word of those here who may be brand biased. Get some hands-on testing if you can. TTC
 

Jeremy S

Hero Member
Feb 27, 2012
515
343
God's Country
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
Garret Ace 250, AT Pro, Garret Pro Pointer
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
it gets alot more depth than slightly vs the ace 250


I've only been using my AT Pro for less than a week, so I can't really comment on the depth until I get some more time behind it. Already I do notice greater depth than my 250. Probably the only way to know for sure would be to find some deep objects with the AT Pro, and then swing the 250 over it to see what it can pick up. Either way, I'm pretty darn happy with my new detector, and would happily recommend it to anyone on here. I bought mine from one of the vendors on here, Big Boy Hobbies, and Bart gave me a pretty good deal on it.

All of my experience is with Garrett, but I would like to try out some other brands someday to mix it up a little. Lots of good choices out there.
 

OP
OP
N

Normsel

Bronze Member
Sep 10, 2012
1,191
813
D'Iberville MS
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
E-Trac
Equinox 800
Equinox 600
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
I appreciate all the feed back everyone has givn me. I like this forum because there are alot of people willing to help. Unfortunately I have not been able to test other detectors but I know it takes a steep learning curve with alot of what ifs while learning. I picked up very valuble tips on here about the 250 and applied all of them but the most important tip I got was to listen to what your machine is telling you. I picked up over $7.00 in clad to day in about 3 hours and some of it was places I had already been over. I have found over $50 in the past month going from a few cents a day to averaging $4 to $6 a day.
My hope is I can learn my next machine as well. I have decided to go with the AT PRO and I am not going to 2nd guess my decision. I plan on using it in water and land. I spend alot of time on the beach in Mexico in the winter and hope it pays off. I have read all I can about most of the popular detectors and most are pretty much apples to apples with each seeming to have some sort of advantage over another brand.

I will keep asking questions because i know the new one will have a sharper learning curve.
 

DaveandBlitz

Greenie
Oct 12, 2012
15
1
E Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites DFX, V3, Tesoro Lobo supertrack
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
DFX 300, V3 I am a whites fan, great discrimination and you can make your own programs to hunt your way!!
 

littlehugger

Full Member
Nov 23, 2005
231
108
Look for water resistance/waterproof. Its a wonderful feature. Backlit controls, pinpoint capability, and a big DD coil.
You can get an AT Pro new for $600. Probably a used Kruzer with three frequencies. Fisher has the F44 with 11 inch coil and splash proof. Older Fishers have dual frequency and splash proof too.
Performance is nice, but very hard to compare. You should be satisfied with any of the brand name mid-level detectors. But, features count too, and can really enhance your enjoyment.
 

☠ Cipher

Full Member
Aug 16, 2016
165
182
Middleburgh, NY
Detector(s) used
Whites: Spectra V3i, MX Sport, Bullseye TRX. Fisher: F75 LTD, 1280-X, F2. XP: Deus. Minelab: X-terra 70, Garrett: AT Pro, Ace 250, Propointer II. Tesoro: Compadre. Bounty Hunter: LRP, QDP, 3300, 2200,
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
If you've got $600 to play with you really might as well cough up the last $50 and go with an Equinox 600. There's nothing in the $600 range that has anything for it, save for the F75+ bundle. That's a lot of machine for the money too, but in the end it's not as adaptable to different hunting environments and not waterproof. I don't see the AT Series having anything for either of those machines. None of the AT machines compare in iron and again, are not nearly as adaptable.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top