If I owned a metal detector, I would definitely try to go here.

AugustMoose87

Sr. Member
Sep 10, 2014
443
264
Longmont, CO
Detector(s) used
Gold Pan, Sluice, Hand Dredge, X-Terra 30, X-Terra 705, Sand Shark
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Definitely. I wish I would have been in to detecting a few years ago to take advantage of the low lakes around here
 

Tom_in_CA

Gold Member
Mar 23, 2007
13,837
10,360
Salinas, CA
🥇 Banner finds
2
Detector(s) used
Explorer II, Compass 77b, Tesoro shadow X2
National park service administers that lake . But I've heard of guys who plied the swim beaches . whether or not they got any flack , I dunno .
 

Chris R

Full Member
Feb 17, 2013
113
93
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Those towns were designated an archeological resource and are off limits to detecting. Already researched them.
 

cudamark

Gold Member
Top Banner Poster
Mar 16, 2011
13,221
14,545
San Diego
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus 2, Equinox 800/900, Fisher Impulse AQ, E-Trac, 3 Excal 1000's, White's TM808, VibraProbe, 15" NEL Attack, Mi6, Steath 920ix and 720i scoops, TRX, etc....
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
That's what I hear too.
 

Treasure_Hunter

Administrator
Staff member
Jul 27, 2006
48,461
54,904
Florida
Detector(s) used
Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

cudamark

Gold Member
Top Banner Poster
Mar 16, 2011
13,221
14,545
San Diego
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus 2, Equinox 800/900, Fisher Impulse AQ, E-Trac, 3 Excal 1000's, White's TM808, VibraProbe, 15" NEL Attack, Mi6, Steath 920ix and 720i scoops, TRX, etc....
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
You'd think they would be happy with us taking all that "heavy metal" out of our drinking water, now wouldn't you?:laughing7:
 

AugustMoose87

Sr. Member
Sep 10, 2014
443
264
Longmont, CO
Detector(s) used
Gold Pan, Sluice, Hand Dredge, X-Terra 30, X-Terra 705, Sand Shark
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
You'd think, huh Cuda? Plus I'd think if someone dove on it when the water was high, they'd have no way of knowing if you were detecting. But I suppose that assumes you are allowed to dive
 

Tom_in_CA

Gold Member
Mar 23, 2007
13,837
10,360
Salinas, CA
🥇 Banner finds
2
Detector(s) used
Explorer II, Compass 77b, Tesoro shadow X2
There's probably scores of places, that if you asked enough questions, of enough bored pencil pusher archies, using key words like "artifact", 'take" and "indian bone", that ..... yes: You'd be told "no". Then we md'rs spread the word around through our writings, posts, etc... that "such & such place is off-limits". Perhaps by specifics. Or perhaps only by ancillary wording regarding "cultural heritage" or "take & remove", etc.....

But sometimes I hear of someone who's gone to such places who simply didn't know any better. NOT TALKING ABOUT HISTORIC SENSITIVE MONUMENTS, but just regular routine beaches (that .... gasp .... are federal?). And lo & behold, they hunted for months or years, and no one ever said so much as "boo" to them. Yup, right in front of rangers, etc..... who never gave them anything but a friendly wave. Imagine their surprise when someone in the md'ing community said "I thought that was off-limits" ? At first they assume the person telling that must be mistaken. Because *certainly* if that were true, then someone would have said something by now, eh ?
 

olprofessor

Jr. Member
Jan 14, 2015
66
30
Northridge, Ca.
Detector(s) used
Garrett Ace 250
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
It's my understanding from a veteran MDer that drained lakes and such might be great places to detect, but that due to the residual moisture in the ground, anything desirable is probably 10 feet down. Makes sense to me. Of course the shoreline is another matter..
 

Tom_in_CA

Gold Member
Mar 23, 2007
13,837
10,360
Salinas, CA
🥇 Banner finds
2
Detector(s) used
Explorer II, Compass 77b, Tesoro shadow X2
....., but that due to the residual moisture in the ground, anything desirable is probably 10 feet down.....

Depends on where on the lake bottom you are. If you're closer to the spillway depths, then yes, they'd be subject to silt. Because think of it: All the years of creek/river water flowing IN TO the reservoir, all bring their grit, silt, etc.... And the dam stops that from proceeding further. That's why, over the years, reservoirs loose depth afterall, is that they're acting as a "stop" to the normal path of silts, sand, grit, dirt, etc..... that comes in with the seasonal waters.

HOWEVER, it's not true of the entire lake/reservoir bottom. I don't know why, but it seems that if there's any sort of a slope to the grade, then said-silts seem to "keep going" till they reach the lower spots. At least from what I've seen in the lowered reservoirs I've hunted during the drought here in CA. The sedimentation is not "uniform" across the entire bottom, for some reason. We found some 1800's coins, and could actually see that the perpetual coverage in water (up till a year or two ago) , had actually served to pull soil OFF some areas. But when we ventured further out into the flats (the slightly deeper portions of hte lake), then yes: We were walking on dried mud. And then even aluminum was deep. Doh!
 

basque-man

Silver Member
Sep 26, 2014
2,521
3,119
W. Nevada / N. CA
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
XP Deus; Minelab E-Trac; Son (Wyatt) uses XP Deus!
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Figures; another no by the feds!!! Uhhhg!!!!!!
 

sandchip

Silver Member
Oct 29, 2010
4,351
6,871
Georgia
Detector(s) used
Teknetics T2SE
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
If the Corps of Engineers tends to the impoundment, they've been known to video arrowhead hunters from over a mile away, then make a case against them. Not for digging, just surface hunting. Good ol' gubment.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top