prospecting Gold Bug II vs Garrett AT Gold

Terry Soloman

Gold Member
May 28, 2010
19,422
30,105
White Plains, New York
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Makro Legend// Pulsedive// Minelab GPZ 7000// Vanquish 540// Minelab Pro Find 35// Dune Kraken Sandscoop// Grave Digger Tools Tombstone shovel & Sidekick digger// Bunk's Hermit Pick
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
I say stay with the Goldbug II if you are detecting for natural gold nuggets
 

OP
OP
GA_Boy

GA_Boy

Bronze Member
Jul 30, 2006
1,433
1,579
Jefferson, Ga
Detector(s) used
BH LRP
1265X,
GoldBug II
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I am and thanks.
 

cudamark

Gold Member
Top Banner Poster
Mar 16, 2011
13,221
14,545
San Diego
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus 2, Equinox 800/900, Fisher Impulse AQ, E-Trac, 3 Excal 1000's, White's TM808, VibraProbe, 15" NEL Attack, Mi6, Steath 920ix and 720i scoops, TRX, etc....
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
The Gold Bug 2 operates at a much higher frequency than the AT Gold or Gold Bug Pro, so, you'll find it easier to hit on the shallow tiny nuggets using it. The AT Gold and GB Pro will have a harder time with the tiny nuggets, but, will have better depth with their lower frequency.
 

OP
OP
GA_Boy

GA_Boy

Bronze Member
Jul 30, 2006
1,433
1,579
Jefferson, Ga
Detector(s) used
BH LRP
1265X,
GoldBug II
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Thanks for the replies. I'll stick with the GBII. I can't believe the tiny pieces it picks up at 2-3 inches.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top