Minelab equinox compared to whites v3i

49er12

Bronze Member
Aug 22, 2013
1,238
1,627
Rolling Rock, Pennsylvania
Detector(s) used
Minelab xterra, Whites DFX, Notka Makro Simplex. Folks the price donā€™t mean everything, the question is are you willing to put in the time to learn the machine, experience will pay off I guarantee it.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I No probably posted before, letā€™s try again. I understand whites machine cost more but given that, minelab machine very comparable,both have optional frequencies etc. so some say minelab technology has over taken whites, both good machines but what ami missing, opinions are nice but whatā€™s the facts performance wise
 

Upvote 0

Toecutter

Bronze Member
Nov 30, 2018
2,433
7,443
šŸ„‡ Banner finds
1
šŸ† Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
ā˜  Cipher;6321798 said:
Square Nail Squirrel is actually fairly new to the hobby. He just happens to be able to put up decent quality videos. I wouldn't say he was a hardcore Whites guy. He barely had either the V3i or the MX Sport long enough to squint before he picked up the Equinox. The best that can be said of his V3i experience is that he butchered the battery compartment to do a weird battery mod that left a huge LiPo battery affixed to the outside of his machine and then used the machine in very basic configurations for a little while. The Equinox is not a replacement for a machine like the V3i. It's more of a supplement. It is a reality though that most people who pick up a V3i are not versed well enough in the underling technology to be able to operate it proficiently, rather than sufficiently.

Sounded like he was pretty good with it to me, you make it sound as though one needs alot of experience with the v3i to make it work as well as the NOX ?? if thats the case why would I want to do that to my self?? settings are nice to have but if you need to fignagle settings at every target to hear it i will out dig you on every hunt with my NOX... i will have more and better quality targets, i will be able to walk the path you took with a v3i and show you all the targets you missed and hurt your feelings....:occasion14:
 

malenkai

Full Member
May 4, 2016
183
552
Chester County, PA
Detector(s) used
E-Trac
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
ā˜  Cipher;6321798 said:
It is a reality though that most people who pick up a V3i are not versed well enough in the underling technology to be able to operate it proficiently, rather than sufficiently.

I also grow weary of this sentiment. If you are not finding as much with machine X than machine Y, you don't know how to use machine X rather than machine Y happens to be better than machine X for the task at hand.

I simply disagree. I think machine Y can be better than machine X at a particular task.

When I started, the war was between the E-Trac and the V3i at the task of finding silver coins. When it was clear as day that the E-Trac was better at that task, V3i defenders would never admit that, they simply would hide behind the quoted line: "you don't understand the V3i".

Whatever. Life is short, and time is precious, and I wanted to spend it finding silver coins, not learning some arcane machine programming to find the same coins the E-Trac could find out of the box (my day job was to program machines, so not only am I not an idiot in that regard, I didn't want that for my hobby).

But, I went a step further. I was fortunate enough to be able to afford both an E-Trac and V3i at the time (hint, buy used), and compared them head to head on the same targets. The E-Trac was simply better at the task of finding silver coins (it wasn't even close), and no amount of arcane programming of the V3i could change that.

I've never used a NOX, so can't answer the question directly, but if the claim is true that the NOX is better than the E-Trac, it is likely better than the V3i.

Now, some of it comes down to taste -- what about the tones, the screen, the weight, and so forth. These things might be important to some people, but I say go for the best machine, and learn to live with annoying taste issues. The E-Trac, for example, is heavy and not balanced well. But that is something I learned to live with as for me, being reasonably physically fit, it was just a taste issue.

Good luck
 

Tahts-a-dats-ago

Sr. Member
Apr 30, 2014
254
563
NJ
Detector(s) used
Legend,
Anfibio multi,
Apex,
ORX,
Deus,
Vanquish 440
Equinox 800
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I simply disagree. I think machine Y can be better than machine X at a particular task.

When I started, the war was between the E-Trac and the V3i at the task of finding silver coins. When it was clear as day that the E-Trac was better at that task, V3i defenders would never admit that, they simply would hide behind the quoted line: "you don't understand the V3i".

Whatever. Life is short, and time is precious, and I wanted to spend it finding silver coins, not learning some arcane machine programming to find the same coins the E-Trac could find out of the box (my day job was to program machines, so not only am I not an idiot in that regard, I didn't want that for my hobby).

But, I went a step further. I was fortunate enough to be able to afford both an E-Trac and V3i at the time (hint, buy used), and compared them head to head on the same targets. The E-Trac was simply better at the task of finding silver coins (it wasn't even close), and no amount of arcane programming of the V3i could change that.

I've never used a NOX, so can't answer the question directly, but if the claim is true that the NOX is better than the E-Trac, it is likely better than the V3i.

Now, some of it comes down to taste -- what about the tones, the screen, the weight, and so forth. These things might be important to some people, but I say go for the best machine, and learn to live with annoying taste issues. The E-Trac, for example, is heavy and not balanced well. But that is something I learned to live with as for me, being reasonably physically fit, it was just a taste issue.

Good luck

I absolutely agree that machine X can be better than machine Y at specific tasks. That is one of the excuses I've used for having more than one machine (I try to have machines that compliment each other while also excelling at a particular task that I deem necessary). The truth of the matter (though) is that I just like trying out different machines that catch my fancy.

I also owned an eTrac while owning a V3i. For me the V3i was the better machine; I found more silver with it and enjoyed using it far more. I actually did like the eTrac (loved that silver warble) but it wasn't balanced very well and I just preferred using the V3i. I sold the eTrac and bought the CTX 3030 (local dealer convinced me that it was the machine that I had to have). I didn't care for the CTX 3030 at all - the balance was better than the eTrac, but it just wasn't the right machine for me, so I sold it as well.

I don't know if the eTrac is the better machine (verses the V3i) or not. I do know that the V3i was/is the better machine for me. Obviously I am in the minority there but given my own experiences (with different machines) I have to think that personal preferences play a vital role when it comes to which machine is the best.

I believe that the reason I found/find more silver with the V3i is because I like that machine better - it fits me well and I just happen to gel with the way Whites machines are set up (I love my MX5 as well). I like all of the machines I currently own, but have the most time on the V3i and the MX5 so I naturally have more confidence when I'm using either of those two machines.

Are there better machines available (than the V3i or the MX5)?

For some specific purposes.... Absolutely.

In general?

I don't believe so. Not yet anyway.

That's not a slight against all other machines - I am quite sure that if I had gelled with either of the two Minelab machines that I'd think (for me) that machine was the best machine for me.

I know I miss stuff with both the V3i and the MX5. I also missed stuff with the eTrac, the CTX 30303, and miss stuff with every machine I own. I know that because I've gone back (time and time again) to the same places with each machine and have found stuff with every machine. I've found stuff that others have missed and I'm sure that others have found stuff I've missed. Maybe I wasn't paying enough attention to those faint sounds, or maybe I just didn't get the coil over that particular spot?

Is there a best machine?

I suppose so. Maybe?

But I think the real question is "best for whom"?

Some swear the Equinox is the best machine. Others say the best machine is the Deus. Then there are those who say the AT Pro/Max is the best machine, or the Fisher F75, Teknetics T2, Whites MX Pro, Tesoro Vaquero, Nokta-Makro Anfibio, etc...

I think they're all correct - for themselves.
 

TheGreenBoy

Sr. Member
Nov 10, 2017
400
465
Countryside
Detector(s) used
DBP2010, eeTH, tx850
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
What do you guys think is better: a porsche or a really big tractor. They both might be in the same price range, even angine power might be comparable. Well, i guess it depends on the task to be performed, if i would like to inpress my wife with a dinner out, a porsche would shure do better, but on the other hand, it is totaly useless for pulling timber out of the woods. And shure one need to know how to drive both of them, they could be equaly letal.

Perhaps some detectors just cannot be directly compared, at least not without telling what is the task you wish to compare.
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top