Equinox 800/600 on black sand beaches

SurgTech57

Full Member
Mar 15, 2014
220
102
South Bend
Detector(s) used
ML Equinox 800, and Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Beach & Shallow Water Hunting

Terry Soloman

Gold Member
May 28, 2010
19,419
30,082
White Plains, New York
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Makro Legend// Pulsedive// Minelab GPZ 7000// Vanquish 540// Minelab Pro Find 35// Dune Kraken Sandscoop// Grave Digger Tools Tombstone shovel & Sidekick digger// Bunk's Hermit Pick
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Excal will not be better. The 600 is very good in heavy black sand here on the East Coast. :skullflag:
 

OP
OP
S

SurgTech57

Full Member
Mar 15, 2014
220
102
South Bend
Detector(s) used
ML Equinox 800, and Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
Good to know as the 800 is easier to pack than my Excal.
 

Rick K

Hero Member
Jan 3, 2007
756
716
Gold Canyon AZ
Detector(s) used
ML SDC-2300, Fisher F-75, XP Deus,
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
My 600 detected a nickel on the surface with 12” between it and the coil. The same nickel buried here gots max of 7” with a low VDI just above iron.

1sfjls.jpg
 

cudamark

Gold Member
Top Banner Poster
Mar 16, 2011
13,198
14,506
San Diego
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus 2, Equinox 800/900, Fisher Impulse AQ, E-Trac, 3 Excal 1000's, White's TM808, VibraProbe, 15" NEL Attack, Mi6, Steath 920ix and 720i scoops, TRX, etc....
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I find the Equinox is a bit better than the Excal in our black sand. You can pretty much ignore the target numbers however. They range all over the place. In areas with iron sand encrusted targets, you even have to dig iron tones. Not fun if it's also an area with lots of solid iron targets.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top