My first Large Cent (as mentioned in previous post)

Damien12

Jr. Member
Apr 2, 2008
31
2
Glren Allen , Virginia
Detector(s) used
Fisher CZ5
Here is the Large Cent (my first) that I found along with the 1918 Mercury Dime in the park in Richmond. It is badly worn and pitted from being "under" so long. But I did make the date with my glasses on, as 1828. Its not beautiful..but its old! Cleaned it with olive oil, then an old toothbrush. However I wont clean the next one as it removed the dirt but also some detail. Oh well..live & learn!

Found it with a Fisher CZ5 about 5 inches down and it read as a quarter!
 

Attachments

  • P2250006.JPG
    P2250006.JPG
    65.4 KB · Views: 559
  • P2250014.JPG
    P2250014.JPG
    62.7 KB · Views: 562
Upvote 0

Evolution

Gold Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,278
2,481
Upstate NY
Detector(s) used
Whites DFX (with 4x6 shooter DD coil and 12" spider coil), Minelab Rocco 2700. (E-Trac)
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Nice find. I love finding the large coppers.
 

CRUSADER

Gold Member
May 25, 2007
40,860
45,448
ENGLAND
🥇 Banner finds
27
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
XP Deus II v0.6 with 11" Coil
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
8) 8) 8) 8)
 

Evolution

Gold Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,278
2,481
Upstate NY
Detector(s) used
Whites DFX (with 4x6 shooter DD coil and 12" spider coil), Minelab Rocco 2700. (E-Trac)
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
The 1828's dont seem to hold up too well underground. Heres a picture of the only coronet large cent I've found.....coincidentally an 1828.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0570.JPG
    IMG_0570.JPG
    62.4 KB · Views: 336
  • IMG_0569.jpg
    IMG_0569.jpg
    76.8 KB · Views: 336
  • IMG_0570.JPG
    IMG_0570.JPG
    62.4 KB · Views: 331
OP
OP
Damien12

Damien12

Jr. Member
Apr 2, 2008
31
2
Glren Allen , Virginia
Detector(s) used
Fisher CZ5
I have noticed from the pictures online that LC's from the 1820's come out usually looking awful. While
LC's from the 1830's or the "teens" seem to come out of the ground in much better shape. Could be
the composite/metal used during those few years wasnt as good a grade. Its still a rush to dig one up
but it would be nice to be able to see the date clearly! Thanks for looking and posting guys!
;D
 

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
Damien12 said:
I have noticed from the pictures online that LC's from the 1820's come out usually looking awful. While
LC's from the 1830's or the "teens" seem to come out of the ground in much better shape. Could be
the composite/metal used during those few years wasnt as good a grade. Its still a rush to dig one up
but it would be nice to be able to see the date clearly! Thanks for looking and posting guys!
;D

I think that ground conditions have more to do with it than the dates, with the exception of the Classic Heads (1808-1814). The Red Book states the following:
The group (1808-1814) does not compare in sharpness and quality to those struck previously (1797-1807) nor to those struck later (from 1816 on). The copper used was softer, having less metallic impurity. This impaired the wearing quality of the series...).

In my area there are sandy well drained soils with little ground mineralization. This allows for nice coppers with little corrosion. In VA, on the other hand, much of the land has been farmed for over 250 years with heavy fertilization. These conditions will wreak havoc on both silver and copper coins alike.

Large copper is to metal detecting, what the great white shark is to the deep sea fisherman. It is the hole in one of the metal detecting world. It is the 300 bowling game. Congrats on the LC!

Neil
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top