|
-
Jun 23, 2008, 10:15 AM
#1
-
Jun 23, 2008, 03:03 PM
#2
 R.I.P all the worms i killed digging my loot.
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
Man! thats great...... 
Semper Fi
SEMPER FI!!!
Click on the banner!!!

-
Jun 23, 2008, 05:42 PM
#3
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
Very nice.........Congrats!!!!
Banking off a Northeast wind, sailin' on a summer breeze
-
Jun 23, 2008, 08:58 PM
#4
So many colonial sites to hunt....so little time.
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
Man. All of the coppers I find come out of the ground corroded. Even the few I've found that werent corroded were very green in color. Yours looks good. It has a very brown color to it. I would love to find one like that. Don't see alot of them like that. What did you do to clean it?
Large copper total for 2008 --7
1797 Draped Bust large cent
1809 Classic Head half cent
1787 New Jersey copper (Maris 63-s variety)
1845 Braided hair large cent (holed)
1835 hard times token (Walsh's General Store)
No detail coppers--2
-
Jun 23, 2008, 09:04 PM
#5
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
the wierd thing is this is how it came out of the ground.
other than cleaning it carefully with a brush wiping off the dirt.
now there was an aluminum can directly ontop of it meaning when i picked the can up there was the coin staring me in the face.
i think the can kept it as clean as it was.
-
Jun 23, 2008, 09:16 PM
#6
So many colonial sites to hunt....so little time.
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by robbuckalew
the wierd thing is this is how it came out of the ground.
other than cleaning it carefully with a brush wiping off the dirt.
now there was an aluminum can directly ontop of it meaning when i picked the can up there was the coin staring me in the face.
i think the can kept it as clean as it was.
Congratulations. Definitely one for the "keeper" box.
Large copper total for 2008 --7
1797 Draped Bust large cent
1809 Classic Head half cent
1787 New Jersey copper (Maris 63-s variety)
1845 Braided hair large cent (holed)
1835 hard times token (Walsh's General Store)
No detail coppers--2
-
Jun 23, 2008, 09:25 PM
#7
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
Thanks I agree
-
Jul 04, 2008, 01:03 PM
#8
 William
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
You seem awfully calm.
Most of the posters here go wild when they find a silver coin,
and even wilder for a "Walker".
-
Jul 04, 2008, 05:58 PM
#9
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by robbuckalew
the wierd thing is this is how it came out of the ground.
other than cleaning it carefully with a brush wiping off the dirt.
now there was an aluminum can directly ontop of it meaning when i picked the can up there was the coin staring me in the face.
i think the can kept it as clean as it was.
If the Aluminum can didn't date from the 18th century, then my archeological brain tells me that the can was place there at the same time as the coin or they wouldn't be the same depth. Someone did this on purpose, hence why the coin looks like it only spent a few years in the soil. IMHO
Other ideas welcome?
(I'm not questioning that you dug this, only guessing what may have happened)
I've yet to find one that nice in the UK, & they are a weekly find for me. Maybe one day
TOO BUSY TO DETECT, YOU'RE TOO BUSY!!!
'No good comes from thinking about how much time we waste detecting, as wasted time is good soul time' - me 25/06/08
How do you find Gold coins? Reply: 'By finding lots of Silver ones..'
A real man thinks about detecting every 6 seconds
-
Jul 04, 2008, 07:29 PM
#10
 Seeker of lost treasure's
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
Awwwwsoom coin. I always thought the coppers were interesting
Sometime's there's not a right way, or a wrong way.
Sometime's there's only one way.
Where there is no economy, people will create one.
No one rule fit's all
-
Jul 06, 2008, 11:00 PM
#11
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by willieboyd2
You seem awfully calm.
Most of the posters here go wild when they find a silver coin,
and even wilder for a "Walker".
I am sorry, am I supposed to scream and jump up and down...I think I'll save that for a gold coin.
Question me if you want, I would do the same thing, but why would I lie about something to people I don't even know or anybody for that matter. I know where this was dug and I guess my post's are unwanted & unappreciated. That's ok with me, less work to do.
-
Jul 07, 2008, 01:00 AM
#12
CANE FIELD BANDITS and IRON BRIGADE MEMBER
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by robbuckalew
 Originally Posted by willieboyd2
You seem awfully calm.
Most of the posters here go wild when they find a silver coin,
and even wilder for a "Walker".
I am sorry, am I supposed to scream and jump up and down...I think I'll save that for a gold coin.
Question me if you want, I would do the same thing, but why would I lie about something to people I don't even know or anybody for that matter. I know where this was dug and I guess my post's are unwanted & unappreciated. That's ok with me, less work to do. 
I was going to make a nice reply to your great finds--until I saw how defensive you were getting. Why is that?
How many walkers have you dug? How many KGII's? In 16 years, I haven't dug too many of the first, and not a single example of the second...
Buckles
Spring 2012 CaneField Bandits Totals:
TEN Half Reales:
1740, 1777, 1784, 1796, 1801, 180?, 1806, 1807, 1808, and 1814
1836 8 Reales
A 17?? One Real
1819 Token/Jeton
Two "Russian Blue" Trade Beads
Henry Clay Campaign Button, 1820s or 1830s
FIVE Early New Orleans Seated Coins:
1838-O Dime (no stars), Two 1839-O Half Dimes, an 1840-O Dime, and an 1842-O Half Dime
1892 Barber Dime
1918 Walking Liberty Half
1866 and 18?? Shield Nickels, and some GawGag V's and Beefaloes.
Military Relics:
Possible Spanish Colonial Era Cap Badge
FOUR War of 1812 Artillery Buttons
1820s Pewter Militia "U.S." Button
CW Eagle Artillery Cuff Button
CW Eagle Infantry Officer's Coat Button
3-Ringers, Enfields, Musketballs, and Shell Fragments
Any relics, coins, or other items appearing in my finds posts were found on PRIVATE PROPERTY with total consent and permission from the owners of said property.
-
Jul 07, 2008, 06:49 AM
#13
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
Here we go again thanks to the the T-Net Police. I my personal opinion, I think that all of you doubters should leave the guy alone. The guy said that he dug the items. You have no other evidence to the contrary. If you do not think his post is fact, thats your choice. No need to jump him and make a mob hit over it. I once dug a 1720 KG I at a very deep depth and was basically put on trial here about the validity of that depth. My coin was dark like his and it was a genuine dug item. If you keep it up with your ignorance, you will eventually ruin the site. It's just a hobby guys, relax a little.
For the author of the post, very nice job and thanks for sharing.
Rifle Building
F&AM
Blacksmithing
-
Jul 09, 2008, 10:24 PM
#14
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
thank you I appreciate that
-
May 07, 2009, 05:18 AM
#15
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by smokedaddy
Here we go again thanks to the the T-Net Police. I my personal opinion, I think that all of you doubters should leave the guy alone. The guy said that he dug the items. You have no other evidence to the contrary. If you do not think his post is fact, thats your choice. No need to jump him and make a mob hit over it. I once dug a 1720 KG I at a very deep depth and was basically put on trial here about the validity of that depth. My coin was dark like his and it was a genuine dug item. If you keep it up with your ignorance, you will eventually ruin the site. It's just a hobby guys, relax a little.
For the author of the post, very nice job and thanks for sharing.
I'm hoping the 't-net' Police & 'doubter' comments is not aimed at me? or is it smokedaddy? If I get questions, I answer them, care to give me any?
For the author of this post, its a very nice find, one I'm likely to never get due to poor soil conditions.
TOO BUSY TO DETECT, YOU'RE TOO BUSY!!!
'No good comes from thinking about how much time we waste detecting, as wasted time is good soul time' - me 25/06/08
How do you find Gold coins? Reply: 'By finding lots of Silver ones..'
A real man thinks about detecting every 6 seconds
-
May 07, 2009, 08:06 AM
#16
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
Nice going on the copper found in South Jersey! The condition of this copper is not unusual for this area of NJ, check out my post of 12 coppers, all found within 30 miles of the 1753 Half Penny in this post. South Jersey soils, depending upon how well drained and lack of fertilizers result is coppers being found in that condition quite often. It is not unusual for this area at all to find some coppers in excellent shape.
Pocono Rob's KGII copper appears to be a regal one and they do handle the soil better overall than a counterfeit would. Most counterfeits are either debased or much thinner and more susceptible to corrosion, and since the vast majority of KGIII coppers are counterfeit, they are the ones found usually in the worst shape. KGII coppers had more Regals circulating here and are rather hefty coins that do well in the ground compared to the KGIII.
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.p...,119986.0.html
Don
"The mantra has always been don't clean a (copper) coin or it will lose value.
For undug coins this is true. For dug coins this is untrue.
The value will increase with judicious cleaning."
-
May 07, 2009, 08:18 AM
#17
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by Don in SJ
Nice going on the copper found in South Jersey! The condition of this copper is not unusual for this area of NJ, check out my post of 12 coppers, all found within 30 miles of the 1753 Half Penny in this post. South Jersey soils, depending upon how well drained and lack of fertilizers result is coppers being found in that condition quite often. It is not unusual for this area at all to find some coppers in excellent shape.
Pocono Rob's KGII copper appears to be a regal one and they do handle the soil better overall than a counterfeit would. Most counterfeits are either debased or much thinner and more susceptible to corrosion, and since the vast majority of KGIII coppers are counterfeit, they are the ones found usually in the worst shape. KGII coppers had more Regals circulating here and are rather hefty coins that do well in the ground compared to the KGIII.
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.p...,119986.0.html
Don
Agreed, but the Aluminium can needs explaining, any ideas?
TOO BUSY TO DETECT, YOU'RE TOO BUSY!!!
'No good comes from thinking about how much time we waste detecting, as wasted time is good soul time' - me 25/06/08
How do you find Gold coins? Reply: 'By finding lots of Silver ones..'
A real man thinks about detecting every 6 seconds
-
May 07, 2009, 06:58 PM
#18
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by CRUSADER
 Originally Posted by robbuckalew
the wierd thing is this is how it came out of the ground.
other than cleaning it carefully with a brush wiping off the dirt.
now there was an aluminum can directly ontop of it meaning when i picked the can up there was the coin staring me in the face.
i think the can kept it as clean as it was.
If the Aluminum can didn't date from the 18th century, then my archeological brain tells me that the can was place there at the same time as the coin or they wouldn't be the same depth. Someone did this on purpose, hence why the coin looks like it only spent a few years in the soil. IMHO
Other ideas welcome?
(I'm not questioning that you dug this, only guessing what may have happened)
I've yet to find one that nice in the UK, & they are a weekly find for me. Maybe one day 
Totally agree. I've had hundreds upon hundreds of dug George coppers vs non dug go though my hands and without a doubt it fits the condition of low grade non dug. I don't care to be called the forum police, or really get involved in a bunch of back and forth posts, and most importantly I'm not saying it wasn't found... but it is what it is, or appears so.
AMERICAN DIGGERS ON SPIKE: THE TRASH WE WOULD LIKE TO DISCRIMINATE OUT!
-
May 14, 2009, 11:23 AM
#19
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
both of those coins are beautiful !!!
-
May 16, 2009, 03:50 AM
#20
Re: 1753 half pence and a lady in 1945
 Originally Posted by plehbah
 Originally Posted by Iron Patch
 Originally Posted by CRUSADER
 Originally Posted by robbuckalew
the wierd thing is this is how it came out of the ground.
other than cleaning it carefully with a brush wiping off the dirt.
now there was an aluminum can directly ontop of it meaning when i picked the can up there was the coin staring me in the face.
i think the can kept it as clean as it was.
If the Aluminum can didn't date from the 18th century, then my archeological brain tells me that the can was place there at the same time as the coin or they wouldn't be the same depth. Someone did this on purpose, hence why the coin looks like it only spent a few years in the soil. IMHO
Other ideas welcome?
(I'm not questioning that you dug this, only guessing what may have happened)
I've yet to find one that nice in the UK, & they are a weekly find for me. Maybe one day 
Totally agree. I've had hundreds upon hundreds of dug George coppers vs non dug go though my hands and without a doubt it fits the condition of low grade non dug. I don't care to be called the forum police, or really get involved in a bunch of back and forth posts, and most importantly I'm not saying it wasn't found... but it is what it is, or appears so.
I agree with you; it is what it is.
Part of an increasing body of evidence!
Maybe we can split a cab sometime and talk some more.
AMERICAN DIGGERS ON SPIKE: THE TRASH WE WOULD LIKE TO DISCRIMINATE OUT!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|