Having a tough time panning concentrates containing only fine gold?

arizau

Bronze Member
May 2, 2014
2,485
3,869
AZ
Detector(s) used
Beach High Banker, Sweep Jig, Whippet Dry Washer, Lobo ST, 1/2 width 2 tray Gold Cube, numerous pans, rocker box, and home made fluid bed and stream sluices.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Having a tough time panning concentrates containing only fine gold? These videos show a technique that may be the answer to your woes. Bear in mind, these are ocean beach concentrates which typically consist mostly of heavy black sands and gold that is about 100 mesh and much smaller! Side note: I would and do classify off and pan different mesh concentrates separately especially if my concentrates are from other than pure beach sand.



 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

chlsbrns

Bronze Member
Mar 30, 2013
1,636
656
Detector(s) used
Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Other
I've never seen that done before but it obviously works!
 

Goodyguy

Gold Member
Mar 10, 2007
6,489
6,895
Arizona
Detector(s) used
Whites TM 808, Whites GMT, Tesoro Lobo Super Traq, Fisher Gold Bug 2, Suction Dredges, Trommels, Gold Vacs, High Bankers, Fluid bed Gold Traps, Rock Crushers, Sluices, Dry Washers, Miller Tables, Rp4
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Nice technique. :icon_thumright:

I did notice that in the second video that the person broke his own rule of having the volume of water match the volume of the material.
Just sayin'

GG~
 

chlsbrns

Bronze Member
Mar 30, 2013
1,636
656
Detector(s) used
Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Other
The gold is very fine. What did you use to concentrate what was panned?

Can you smelt using a good flux?? Do you have a torch or furnace?

I think there is probably almost certainly gold to small to see. You can't pan what you can't see! With good eyesight we can see about 300 mesh but it's not easy.

If you stop panning when there is 70% black sands and 30% visible gold and smelt you would almost certainly get more gold!

Its a lot less expensive to purchase individual flux ingredients from a ceramic shop and mix your own flux. We use a flux to retain the gold and silver and remove other metals mainly copper. The flux costs about .75 cents per oz. You use 2 parts flux to one part material being smelted by weight.

It's easy to do and pays for itself in recovered gold and silver.
 

Last edited:

Capt Nemo

Bronze Member
Apr 11, 2015
1,058
1,609
Oshkosh, WI
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I hit gold so small that I have to use both lenses on the magnifier to determine that it is gold.
 

OP
OP
A

arizau

Bronze Member
May 2, 2014
2,485
3,869
AZ
Detector(s) used
Beach High Banker, Sweep Jig, Whippet Dry Washer, Lobo ST, 1/2 width 2 tray Gold Cube, numerous pans, rocker box, and home made fluid bed and stream sluices.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Not my videos. He calls his concentrator a "Frankencube" (by the looks a 7 tray gold cube with some mat modification, etc.) and he still loses gold. Google up washingtonbeachmining for you tube links. You are right on about the size of the gold particles, minus 100 mesh all the way down "to seen under magnification only" or at least that is my experience with the concentrates I get from some Oregon beaches. For me, beach creek sluiced material only since motorized equipment is prohibited on Oregon beaches.
 

Last edited:

chlsbrns

Bronze Member
Mar 30, 2013
1,636
656
Detector(s) used
Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Other
Washington beach mining is doing ok considering they are feeding with a hand shovel and not really moving much material. A lot of loss too!

I would think that Oregon beaches are better than Washington. Look for loopholes in the Oregon law. When law makers who don't know what they are talking about make laws they usually screw up!
 

johnedoe

Bronze Member
Jan 15, 2012
1,489
2,239
Oregon Coast
Detector(s) used
White's V3i, White's MXT, and White's Eagle Spectrum
Cleangold sluice & prospectors pan, EZ-Gold Pan, and custom cleanup sluice.
Primary Interest:
Other
In the first vid he has way too much material in the pan for finishing.... That would take way to long to work out.
But then I am kinda impatient and have developed my own techniques to deal with our fine gold and beach sands.
I showed arizau my technique when he was here a year ago.
 

Last edited:

johnedoe

Bronze Member
Jan 15, 2012
1,489
2,239
Oregon Coast
Detector(s) used
White's V3i, White's MXT, and White's Eagle Spectrum
Cleangold sluice & prospectors pan, EZ-Gold Pan, and custom cleanup sluice.
Primary Interest:
Other
Washington beach mining is doing ok considering they are feeding with a hand shovel and not really moving much material. A lot of loss too!

I would think that Oregon beaches are better than Washington. Look for loopholes in the Oregon law. When law makers who don't know what they are talking about make laws they usually screw up!

There are a couple of Oregon beaches that might be better and do have a little courser gold. The Oregon regs are screwy...
Actually if you read them literally you wouldn't be able to beach mine.....

Screen Shot 2018-06-25 at 7.55.39 AM.png
 

chlsbrns

Bronze Member
Mar 30, 2013
1,636
656
Detector(s) used
Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Other
There are a couple of Oregon beaches that might be better and do have a little courser gold. The Oregon regs are screwy...
Actually if you read them literally you wouldn't be able to beach mine.....

View attachment 1605215

I would read the actual statutes but the pic that you posted shows me that there are loopholes. I won't discuss it on a public forum until I read the actual law. Actually I wouldn't discuss it in a public forum after reading the law.
 

cosmetal

Jr. Member
Aug 22, 2017
33
16
Sacramento CA
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
The gold is very fine. What did you use to concentrate what was panned?

Can you smelt using a good flux?? Do you have a torch or furnace?

I think there is probably almost certainly gold to small to see. You can't pan what you can't see! With good eyesight we can see about 300 mesh but it's not easy.

If you stop panning when there is 70% black sands and 30% visible gold and smelt you would almost certainly get more gold!

Its a lot less expensive to purchase individual flux ingredients from a ceramic shop and mix your own flux. We use a flux to retain the gold and silver and remove other metals mainly copper. The flux costs about .75 cents per oz. You use 2 parts flux to one part material being smelted by weight.

It's easy to do and pays for itself in recovered gold and silver.

Care to share your flux recipe?

Thanks!

James
 

chlsbrns

Bronze Member
Mar 30, 2013
1,636
656
Detector(s) used
Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Other

Attachments

  • 20180318_142709.jpg
    20180318_142709.jpg
    344.2 KB · Views: 95
Last edited:

cosmetal

Jr. Member
Aug 22, 2017
33
16
Sacramento CA
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Too cool . . . .! Thanks for the recipe and procedures.

My cons come from incinerated IC chips from eWaste. My goal is to smelt the IC cons and ship my "dore" bars (Cu, Au, Ag, and PGMs) to a refiner and get paid from the assay for all precious and noble metals.

Nice castings!

James
 

chlsbrns

Bronze Member
Mar 30, 2013
1,636
656
Detector(s) used
Excalibur II
Primary Interest:
Other
The CU (copper) and everything except gold and silver will be gone.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top