clv
Hero Member
- Dec 23, 2012
- 714
- 1,101
- Detector(s) used
-
Current Detectors; Minelab Safari, Equinox 600
TRX Pin Pointer, Fisher 1235x
Have owned; Minelab Eureka gold,
Tesoro Compadre, White's MX5, GMT, MXT Pro,
fisher cz7a pro, go fine 20, Garret Ma
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Minelab Metal Detectors1 week ago
Our pleasure to assist. Safari is a very good, but under-rated, FBS detector. How does EQUINOX compare to Safari regarding the main functions that most impact on performance.They both have similar Target ID resolution (50 segments compared to 51) and they both have 4 main detect modes. With Safari, the detect modes are based on target types and a preset discrimination pattern. With EQUINOX, the detect modes are based on the ground conditions. When running in "Multi" the Multi-IQ processing is specifically tailored for those locations. We will be covering this in more detail on Treasure Talk in the coming weeks/months, along with publishing practical reports from our testers in the northern hemisphere.
Found this in a response from minelab about the multi-feq and safari fbs
I thought other Safari users might be interested in the answer.
Our pleasure to assist. Safari is a very good, but under-rated, FBS detector. How does EQUINOX compare to Safari regarding the main functions that most impact on performance.They both have similar Target ID resolution (50 segments compared to 51) and they both have 4 main detect modes. With Safari, the detect modes are based on target types and a preset discrimination pattern. With EQUINOX, the detect modes are based on the ground conditions. When running in "Multi" the Multi-IQ processing is specifically tailored for those locations. We will be covering this in more detail on Treasure Talk in the coming weeks/months, along with publishing practical reports from our testers in the northern hemisphere.
Found this in a response from minelab about the multi-feq and safari fbs
I thought other Safari users might be interested in the answer.
