Welcome guest, is this your first visit?
Member
Discoveries
 
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Apr 2008
    286
    9 times
    Banner Finds (1)

    Wikileaks Cables on Odyessey Marine Exploration

    C O N F I D E N T I A L MADRID 001285

    SIPDIS

    SIPDIS

    E.O. 12958: DECL: 6/26/2017
    TAGS: ECON SP PREL EWWT SCUL PHSA PBTS
    SUBJECT: WHEN WILL ODYSSEY SHIPS SAIL OUT?

    REF: MADRID 1191 AND PREVIOUS

    Classified By: Deputy Cheif of Mission Hugo Llorens for reasons 1.4 (b)
    and (d)

    ¶1. (C) Odyssey Marine Exploration representatives Marie
    Rogers and Ali Nasser requested a meeting with EconOff June
    26 to informally update the Embassy on the American company's
    plans to sail out from Gibraltar. Despite assurances that the
    Spanish would indeed attempt to execute the warrant against
    Odyssey, possibly leading to the detention of its vessel/s in
    disputed international waters, Nasser said the company had
    decided nonetheless to leave port as soon as possible.

    ¶2. (C) The Odyssey representatives outlined a 3-step timeline
    for one or both vessels' departure from port which could
    occur as early as next week. The first step would be the
    drafting of an "Affidavit of Events" leading up to Odyssey's
    "Black Swan" find (reftel). US Odyssey lawyers are currently
    drafting that affidavit which will include a declaration that
    in Fall 2006, Odyssey head Greg Stemm met with the Ministry
    of Culture on what eventually turned out to be the "Black
    Swan" find. Once this affidavit is complete, the second step
    is for Odyssey representatives to once more approach the
    Ministry of Culture, affidavit in hand, to attempt to reach a
    compromise. From the date of this meeting, Odyssey employees
    will begin the third step of divesting its vessels of the
    expensive exploration equipment currently onboard. Once this
    divestment is complete, the Odyssey vessels will set sail
    with an American master, with representatives Ali Nasser and
    Marie Rogers, and with a filming crew on board.

    3.(C) Nasser said that in the interests of transparency,
    Odyssey will notify the Spanish Guardia Civil the night
    before of their intentions to set sail. If the Spanish do
    not detain the ships, then they will sail on to Great
    Britain. Nasser also indicated that should the Ministry of
    Culture be receptive to compromise, Odyssey representatives
    would offer to sail their vessels into Spanish waters to
    allow a search while avoiding an international dispute over
    the waters around Gibraltar. Nasser said that Odyssey was
    also prepared to invite GoS along on its next salvaging trip
    to the Black Swan site. However, Nasser caveated, these
    offers would only be given if the Spanish guarantee that they
    will not detain Odyssey ships. Econoff expressed
    appreciation for Odyssey efforts towards compromise, and
    encouraged continued flexibility in reaching a solution that
    would avert contestation in international waters where all
    parties, including Odyssey, would lose.

    ¶4. (C) Comment: Odyssey's current strategy is to provide a
    "face saving" way out for Spain that would also allow the
    Odyssey to regain the use of their ships. The Ministry of
    Culture and its corresponding Andalucian stakeholders will be
    the key to how this issue proceeds. Though the offer to allow
    a Spanish representative to be on board when the Odyssey
    returns to the Black Swan site may be tempting to MoC, it is
    difficult to predict how emotions or local political
    gamesmanship will affect the outcome. Ultimately, the larger
    issue for both parties is ownership of the coins, a theme
    where neither Odyssey nor the different Spanish factions have
    expressed a willingness to budge. Odyssey's thoughts on how
    to approach this dispute are ever changing, and hence there
    is always a possibility that their course of action may
    change. Nonetheless, Odyssey representatives advised Post
    that they would continue to keep us in the loop of
    developments.




    Friday, 07 September 2007, 10:49
    UNCLAS MADRID 001722
    SIPDIS
    SENSITIVE
    SIPDIS
    STATE FOR EUR/WE, L, AND OES
    EO 12958 N/A
    TAGS PREL, EWWT, PBTS, PHSA, SCUL, SP, CA
    SUBJECT: ODYSSEY UPDATE: DHS DELIVERS CUSTOMS INFORMATION
    REF: MADRID 1670 AND PREVIOUS
    ¶1. (SBU) On September 6, DHS-ICE Attache delivered the Odyssey Customs import documents to Director of Aduanas Nicolas Bonilla, as requested by GOS via the Customs Mutual Assistance Agreement (CMAA) on July 24. The DHS-ICE Attache advised Bonilla that the information was confidential and to be used only for law enforcement purposes. Bonilla expressed appreciation for the information, and assured the DHS-ICE Attache that it would be used only for official purposes. He added that Aduanas would make a formal request through DHS channels before sharing the documents with any other GOS agency. Post advised MFA representatives of this exchange the afternoon of September 6.
    ¶2. (SBU) Separately, the MFA sent Post a diplomatic note September 4 in response to the Ambassador’s August 29 meeting with Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos (ref). MFA officials advised us verbally that they will seek the Odyssey information through their Aduanas, acknowledging that Aduanas would first have to seek the necessary permission from DHS. Jorge Domecq, MFA’s Deputy Director for Gibraltar Issues, noted that MFA was interested in obtaining the Odyssey customs information to provide to lawyers representing the GOS in the Tampa Admiralty Court.
    ¶3. (SBU) Meanwhile, the Odyssey Explorer remains docked in Gibraltar and has not yet unloaded its cargo. According to British Embassy representatives, Odyssey representatives have stated that the vessel will begin unloading its cargo the week of September 10.
    ¶4. (SBU) Below is an informal translation of Foreign Ministry diplomatic note 277/31 dated August 31, which was provided to the Embassy on September 4.
    Begin Text:
    (complimentary opening)...and has the honor to refer to Embassy Note Verbal No. 445 of 20 August 2007 on obtaining the documents for entry into the United States of the objects of archeological value brought up by the “Odyssey Marine Exploration” from a wreck code-named “Black Swan.”
    In this regard, the Ministry wishes to reiterate to the Embassy the request made for the above mentioned documents in Note Verbal number 79 of 22 May 2007.
    Furthermore, the Ministry seeks to inform the Embassy as follows:
    - On 24 July 2007, the Director of the Department of Customs and Excise Taxes of the Tax Agency of Spain sent a letter to the Director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection requesting these documents pursuant to Article X of the Mutual Assistance Agreement on Customs (“special assistance cases”). A copy of the letter is attached hereto.
    -The documents are requested for the Tax Agency of Spain, which is the agency responsible for the enforcement of Spanish and Community customs legislation.
    - The documents are requested to investigate the legality and validity of the transfer to the United States of the two shipments of coins and archeological material from Gibraltar referred to in the attached document, and to enforce compliance with all applicable Spanish legislation in this area, take all appropriate judicial action and assert the rights of the Government of Spain in all appropriate legal venues.
    - The Spanish Government will approach this matter with the discretion and confidentiality that it applies to all its relations with the U.S. Government...
    (Complimentary closing)
    End Text. AGUIRRE
    UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MADRID 001952

    SIPDIS

    SIPDIS

    E.O. 12958: N/A
    TAGS: PBTS PHSA SCUL SP UK
    SUBJECT: SPANISH DEMARCHES ON ODYSSEY ONCE AGAIN

    REF: STATE 138377 AND PREVIOUS

    MADRID 00001952 001.2 OF 002


    ¶1. (SBU) On October 9, Foreign Ministry Deputy Director for
    North American Affairs Fernando Prieto presented a nonpaper
    to desk officer Elaine Samson and EconOff reinforcing the
    GOS' desire to obtain broader access to the Odyssey import
    documents into the U.S. and requesting that the U.S. conduct
    an investigation of potential violations of U.S. law on the
    part of Odyssey Marine Exploration company.

    ¶2. (SBU) The text of the message, which was presented in
    English, is as follows:

    Further to the meetings of 27 September 2007 and 3rd October
    2007 with Mr. Bellinger, Legal Advisor, U.S. Department of
    State, here is a reply to the points raised by him on the two
    Spanish requests included in the Non Paper dated 24th
    September 2007.

    Request A: That the documents presented by Odyssey Marine
    Exploration (OME) for entry into the U.S. of certain
    archaeological goods be released for confidential use.

    ¶1. Release of the documents is requested for
    confidential use in investigation of potential violations of

    SIPDIS
    application U.S. Customs and Spanish laws concerning the
    extraction and shipment of these goods, and in judicial
    proceedings that may arise from enforcement of the relevant
    United States and Spanish Laws.

    ¶2. Additionally, there is reason to believe that the
    materials imported by OME are property of the Kingdom of
    Spain taken from the sea and imported to the U.S. in
    violation of Spanish law. The importation of these materials
    may accordingly be subject to U.S. Customs laws as materials
    imported contrary to relevant U.S. and Spanish law concerning
    the protection of national property, military property and
    historical/cultural heritage. In particular, available
    information indicates that the documents contain specific
    information with respect to the location from which the
    materials were taken and identification of the nationality
    and the dates of coins and other artifacts. This information
    is believed to provide confirmation that the materials in
    question were taken from a warship of the Royal Navy of Spain
    that sank in battle during the early 19th Century and are
    property of the Royal Treasury of the Kingdom of Spain that
    was being transported by this vessel in service of the
    Kingdom Spain. Release of the requested documents is
    necessary to investigate the application of such laws and to
    assist U.S. Customs and such other competent U.S. agencies as
    may be authorized to have access to the documents for
    purposes of potential enforcement proceedings.

    ¶3. The agencies of the Government of Spain that have
    competence in the investigation of this matter and/or in
    judicial enforcement proceedings, and to which the documents
    would therefore be made available: Spanish Customs, Ministry
    of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Ministry of Culture,
    Ministry of Justice, Spanish Navy. It is understood that the
    documents shall be held in confidence by authorized
    representatives of the competent Spanish agencies and used
    only for investigation and/or enforcement proceedings in
    Spain and/or the U.S.

    Request B: That the possible violation by OME of U.S.
    customs or other rules be fully investigated and prosecuted
    by U.S. authorities.

    ¶1. U.S. Customs laws OME might have violated: 18 U.S.C.
    Section 542 which prohibits the importation of materials by
    means of false statements; 18 U.S.C Section 545, which
    prohibits the importation of goods to the U.S. in violation
    of any law (which may include Spanish law); and 19 U.S.C.
    Section 1595a, which provides for seizure and forfeiture of
    goods imported in violation of relevant laws.

    ¶2. The available information indicates that the
    importation of these materials may have occurred by means of
    false and/or misleading statements concerning the country of
    origin, ownership, value, legal status, and/or other
    characteristics of the imported materials. Additionally, as
    noted above, to the extent that specific information as to
    the location and identifying characteristics of the materials
    was provided in the documents, it is believed to constitute
    evidence of the taking and shipment to the U.S. of national
    property of Spain in violation of Spanish law concerning such
    property and corresponding U.S. laws concerning the
    importation of such property.

    ¶3. Should additional information concerning this matter
    be needed at this stage, it would be provided on request on a

    MADRID 00001952 002.2 OF 002


    confidential basis. An investigative dossier is currently

    SIPDIS
    being assembled concerning the available evidence, for which
    the requested documents are needed, and will be made
    available to the U.S. Customs, the Department of State and
    such other U.S. agencies as may be deemed appropriate by the
    U.S.


    LLORENS

  2. #2
    Charter Member
    us
    Pirate of the Martires

    Feb 2005
    Pinellas Park, Florida
    Aquapulse, J.W. Fisher Proton 3, Pulse Star II
    2,021
    4 times
    Shipwrecks

    Re: Wikileaks Cables on Odyessey Marine Exploration

    WOW! GoHo, you da man!

  3. #3
    us
    Sep 2005
    554

    Re: Wikileaks Cables on Odyessey Marine Exploration

    The cables involving the Odyssey demonstrate the State Department circumventing the judicial process.
    Whether there was a possible violation of custom import laws is not a matter for Spain to decide but would be a matter of investigation by the U.S. Government.

    If the U.S. was merely aiding Spain in acquiring "Discovery" documents, that is a clear violation of the judicial process whereas Spain may "petition" the court for discovery of the documents.

    To "make a deal" outside of the judicial process, without the parties being aware or in agreement is clearly unethical and apparently was a matter to serve some private agendas, and any employee(s) who engaged in such should be terminated as they obviously violated the "trust" they are given in their government positions.

    In another cable, hypocrisy is seen in an international child abduction/custody battle whereas the U.S. and Spain are once again the players. In the custody case where the mother took the child from New Jersey to Spain, the respected countries stated it is not for the governments to decide but should be left up to the judicial system to decide. The parents and the child are citizens of the U.S.


    itmaiden

 

 

Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3