Drop riffle sluice vs fluid bed sluice...

KevinInColorado

Gold Member
Jan 9, 2012
7,037
11,370
Summit County, Colorado
Detector(s) used
Grizzly Goldtrap Explorer & Motherlode, Gold Cube with trommel or Banker on top, Angus Mackirk Expedition, Gold-n-Sand Xtream Hand pump
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Fluidbeds typically either process very little material or they lose -120 mesh gold. HOWEVER a self classifying, high volume fluidbed will process so Much more material that you’ll go home with more gold in most cases.
 

Gold4Mike

Full Member
May 10, 2017
230
718
Mount Vernon, Washington
Detector(s) used
Angus Mackirk Foreman
Grizzly Goldtrap Explorer
Gold Hog Piglet highbanker
Home made slate miller table
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
I have got a drop riffle sluice (Angus Mackirk Foreman) and a fluid bed (Grizzly Gold Trap). I haven't done a direct comparison test and I like them both, but I can run a butt load more gravel on the GGT and can classify larger on it (or not at all) than I can running the AM. I seem to have no problem catching fine gold with either but I usually will use the GGT and run a lot more gravel.
 

mytimetoshine

Bronze Member
Jun 23, 2013
1,574
3,370
El Dorado County
Detector(s) used
GRIZZLY GOLD TRAP - ANGUS MACKIRK EXPLORER- BLUE BOWL - GOLD CUBE, MINELAB PRO 25 PINPOINTER-
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Drop riffle and a fluid bed sluice are very different from each other. Both have the place.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top