LRL's do not work!

[RobertS]

I have investigated the L.R.L. now for many years and have found out why they do not work.
My 11 page article with pictures in posted at www.terrafirmaassayers.com
I find the EM 83 to be a very good deep search machine, but you had better know how to use it.
Sincerely, Robert

[bojangles]

Robert,

I have an EM83 as well. I hit some really nice targets with it, and have used other forms of resistivity and pulse to verify. The tough part is always extraction

BUT - all of those "good" targets that the EM83 generated were located within 75 yards of an LRL triangulation. There can be quite few false positives with LRLs, operator error, weather, solar activity, etc. but patience and practice (even skepticism) was key. I just find it great that 6/10 times I go out Thunting, I can triangulate into an "area of investigation" and nail a target. I use my EM83 as a great verifier, but like most other sensitive electronics, it has had its operational issues in humid-swamp-like parts of the world. Its a good thing that Geo Western (Garry) stands by his units and offers excellent support even while I was on site.

True, some sites that I hit may be natural ore and deep scrap metal, but the places I search are usually fairly remote low in metal trash. To me, the LRLs are fascinating machines that are not always consistent (due to variables), but a necessary tool for any serious treasure hunter.

Thanks for sharing your work! Happy hunting!

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Evening swr hmmmmmmm
Yer wrong , not all are.

Don Jose de La Mancha

"I exist to live, not live to exist"

p.s. Nope, won't.

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Just a rational observation here...

From a person that has never saw one or used one.

but LRL's have already been proven to be fraudulent instruments, and not capable of performing the tasks claimed.

It is funny that happy LRL users are everywhere...Art